The Role of exclusive breastfeeding and water source in the reduction of stunting: Mediation and moderation analysis of cross-sectional data among Beninese children aged 6 months Moderator of N@C project effect on stunting

Main Article Content

Jaurès F. H. Lokonon https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3208-1138
Waliou Amoussa Hounkpatin
Sam U.F. Bodjrenou
Morel Yves Sokadjo
Nicole Idohou Dossou
Mintodê Nicodème Atchadé
Nobert M. Hounkonnou

Keywords

Exclusive breastfeeding, stunting, water-source, structural equations models

Abstract

Background: Stunting is a public health issue in many low and middle income countries. The role played by exclusive breastfeeding practice (EBF) and water source (WS) used by the mothers in stunting reduction needs to be more clarified. Objective: To test whether EBF and WS are moderators or mediators of participation in Nutrition at Centre (N@C) project activities effect on child stunting reduction. Methods: We used cross-sectional data on 213 mothers and their 6 months’ age children from 40 villages in Southern Benin. Scores of participation in N@C activities (SPA) were estimated by counting the activities in which the mothers have participated during the  last six months. Association between prevalence of stunting (length-for-age z-score < - 2) and SPA was investigat-ed binary and multinomial logistic regression. Then, EBF and WS were included in the models to check whether they were mediators or moderators. Results: In our sample, 16% of children were stunted. High SPA of mothers was likely associated with low stunting prevalence (OR=0.92; 95% IC: 0.87-0.98). We did not have evidence to claim that neither EBF nor WS were a mediator of the effect of SPA on stunting reduction, but they were moderators. While the score of participation increased and the mothers didn’t practice EBF, the stunting prevalence increased slightly from 21.4% to 26.8%. Moreover, the score of participation increased and WS is drilling system or covered well or tap, the stunting prevalence decreased by 15.6%, 26.9%, and 45.4%, respectively. Conclusions: EBF and WS have been the moderators of SPA effect on children stunting prevalence at 6 months of age. Effective practice of EBF and the use of appropriate WS by the mothers are needed to have a large effect of participation in the nutrition community projects on the reduction of stunting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 47 | PDF Downloads 92

References

1. National Institute of Statistics and Economic Analysis and ICF. Demography and Health Survey, DHS 2017-2018. Cotonou, Benin and Rockville, Maryland, USA ; 2019.
2. Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, et al. Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 2013; 382:427–51.
3. https://nutritionatthecenter.wordpress.com/2016/02/29/pushing-the-national-nutrition-plan-in-benin/. Accessed on 4th April, 2019
4. Panjwani A, Heidkamp R. Complementary Feeding Interventions Have a Small but Significant Impact on Linear and Ponderal Growth of Children in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Nutr. 2017;147 (Suppl):2169S–78S.
5. Owais A, Schwartz B, Faruque ASG, et al. Nutrition Education Program in Rural Bangladesh was Associated with Improved Feeding Practices but Not with Child Growth. J Nutr 2017;147:948–54.
6. Cumming O, Cairncross S. Can water, sanitation and hygiene help eliminate stunting? Current evidence and policy implications. Matern & Child Nutr. 2016;12 (Suppl 1) 91–105.
7. Wondimu, M. Examining the Impact of Household Access to Water and Sanitation on Child Malnutrition in Ethiopia. Thesis, Georgia State University, 2016. http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/iph_theses/486
8. World Health Organization. Continued breastfeeding for healthy growth and development of children. 2018. http://www.who.int/elena/titles/continued_breastfeeding/en. Accessed on 30th March, 2018.
9. Gertler P, Shah M, Alzua ML, Cameron L, Martinez S, Patil S. How does health promotion work? Evidence from the dirty business of eliminating open defecation. Working Paper 20997. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2015.
10. Fenn B, Bulti AT, Nduna T, Duffield A, Watson F. An evaluation of an operations research project to reduce childhood stunting in a food-insecure area in Ethiopia. Public Health Nutr. 2012;15:1746–54.
11. Luby SP, Rahman M, Arnold BF, et al. Effects of water quality, sanitation, handwashing, and nutritional interventions on diarrhoea and child growth in rural Bangladesh: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2018; 6:e302–15
12. https://www.iaea.org/projects/tc/int6058. Accessed on 4th March, 2018
13. National Institute of Statistics and Economic Analysis and World Food Programme. Global analysis of vulnerability and of Food Security 2013. Cotonou, Benin ; 2014.
14. https://opendatakit.org/software/. Accessed on 2nd May 2017
15. WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2006;450:76–85.
16. Fairchild AJ, MacKinnon DP. A general model for testing mediation and moderation effects. Pre Sci. 2009:10(2)87-99
17. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers and Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6) 1173-1182.
18. Shrout, PE, Bolger N. Mediation in Experimental and Non experimental Studies: New Procedures and Recommendations. Psychol Methods. 2002;7:422-445.
19. Sobel ME. Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1982. pp.290-312.
20. Scott A. Czepiel. Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Logistic Regression Models: Theory and Implementation. 2018. https://czep.net/stat/mlelr.pdf 

21. Eriksen KG, Johnson W, Sonko B, Prentice AM, Darboe MK, Moore SE. Following the World Health Organization recommendation of exclusive breastfeeding to 6 months of age does not impact the growth of rural Gambian infants. J Nutr. 2016 Dec 21 (Epub ahead of print: doi: 10.3945/jn.116.241737).
22. WHO, UNICEF, USAID. Improving Nutrition Outcomes with Better Water, Sanitation and Hygiene: Practical Solutions for Policies and Programmes.2015. https://www.unicef.org/media/files/IntegratingWASHandNut_WHO_UNICEF_USAID_Nov2015.pdf
23. World Health Organization. Evidence linking WASH interventions to global target. 2018. http://www.who.int/elena/titles/targets/wash/en/. Accessed on 30th March, 2018.
24. Roushdy R, Sieverding M, & Radwan H. The Impact of Water Supply and Sanitation On Child Health: Evidence From Egypt. Poverty, Gender, And Youth Working Paper. No. 24, 2012. http://www.popcouncil.org/uploads/pdfs/wp/pgy/024.pdf
25. Cheng JJ, Schuster-Wallace CJ, Watt S, Newbold BK, Mente A. An ecological quantification of the relationships between water, sanitation and infant, child and maternal mortality. Environ Health. 2012;11:4.
26. Fiedler K, Schott M, Meiser T. What mediation analysis can (not) do. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2011; 47(6)1231-1236.

Most read articles by the same author(s)