Effect of protein level and slaughter age on carcass traits and meat quality of Bruna Alpine steers

Main Article Content

Davide De Marzo
Vito Laudadio
Vincenzo Tufarelli

Keywords

Cattle, Nutrition, Protein, Carcass.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of dietary protein level on the growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality of Bruna Alpina steers slaughtered at different ages. Animals were weighing approximately 260 kg and were divided equally into two treatment groups. Group A received a Crude Protein deficient diet (8.50 %) wile group B was given adequate crude protein throughout the study (12.20 % crude protein on a dry matter basis). Four cattle from each group were slaughtered at approximately 30 days intervals. Carcasses were yield graded and chilling took place at 3° C and were aged for 21 days at 4 °C. Proximate analysis of Longissimus muscle were determined and separable components of 11th rib were separated. Cattle in group B which had been fed adequate protein were heavier at slaughter than cattle in group A which was fed the protein deficient diet (486.1 versus 442.4 Kg; p < .05) and ADG (1.02 versus 0.63 kg/d; p < .01).  As for proximate composition of LD muscle groups 190 and 150 days were characterized by the lowest protein (p<.05), instead LD from group 190 days showed the highest lipid content (6.98%). We concluded that increasing the amount of dietary protein as used in this study tended to improve some carcass quality.

Abstract 149 | PDF Downloads 272

References

1. Aberle, ED, Reeves ES, Judge MD, Hunsley RE, Peery T W. Palatability and muscle characteristics of cattle with controlled weight gain: time on a high energy diet. Journal of Animal Science 1981; ISSN: 0021-8812. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1981.524757x

2. Agricultural and Food Research Council (AFRC). Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. CAB International, 1993; Wallingford, Oxon, UK.

3. Albrecht E, Teuscher F, Ender K, Wegner J. Growth- and breed-related changes of muscle bundle structure in cattle. J Anim Sci. 2006; 84(11):2959-64. doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-345.

4. Cortese M, Segato S, Andrighetto I, Ughelini N, Chinello M, Schiavon E and Marchesini G. The Effects of Decreasing Dietary Crude Protein on the Growth Performance, Feed Efficiency and Meat Quality of Finishing Charolais Bulls. Animals 2019; 9(11), 906; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9110906

5. Crouse J D, Calkins C R, Seideman S C. The effects of rate change in body weight on tissue development and meat quality of youthful bulls. Journal of Animal Science 1986; 63(6):1824-9. doi: 10.2527/jas1986.6361824x.

6. Dal Maso M, Schiavon S, Tagliapietra F, Simonetto A, Bittante G. Growth performance and N excretion of double muscled Piemontese bulls fed low protein rations with or without the addition of rumen protected conjugated linoleic acid. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2009; 8, 175–177.

7. Galvani DB, Pires CC, Kozloski GV, Wommer TP. Energy requirements of Texel crossbred lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 2008; 86 pp. 3480-3490, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1097

8. Garrigus RR, Johnson HR, Thomas NW, Firth WL and Judge MD. Effect of feeding regime on bovine body composition. Quantitative and qualitative carcass traits. Report to NC-58 Technical Committee Purdue University 1967; Lafayette, Indiana.

9. Gleghorn, JF, Elam NA, Galyean ML, Duff GC, Cole NA, Rivera JD. Effects of crude protein concentration and degradability on performance, carcass characteristics, and serum urea nitrogen concentrations in finishing beef steers. J. Anim. Sci. 2004; 82, 2705–2717.

10. Gomes RA, Busato KC, Ladeira MM, Johnson KA, Galvão CM, Castro Rodrigues A, Chizzotti ML. Energy and protein requirements for Angus and Nellore young bulls. Livestock Science 2017; Volume 195, January, Pages 67-73, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.11.011

11. Ha DM, Jung DY, Park MJ, Park BC, Lee CY. Effects of sires with different weight gain potentials and varying planes of nutrition on growth of growing-finishing pigs. J Anim Sci Technol. 2014; 56:22. doi: 10.1186/2055-0391-56-22.

12. Hedrick HB, Miller JC, Thompson GB, Freitag RR. Factors affecting longissimus dorsi area and fat thickness of beef and relation between these measurements and retail yield
Journal of Animal Science, 1965; Volume 24, Issue 2, May 1965, Pages 333–337, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1965.242333x

13. Kasim O Aziz and Azad S Salih Al-Dabbagh. Effect of Plane of Nutrition during Late Pregnancy and Early Lactation on Milk Production and Lambs Growth of Hamadani Ewes Jordan. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2008; Volume 4, No. 2, -148

14. Li ZY, Wang X, He Y, Cao BH. Effects of different dietary energy and protein levels and sex on growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of F1 Angus × Chinese Xiangxi yellow cattle. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 2014; 5, 21–32

15. Lingyan L, Yuankui Z, Xianyou W, Yang H, Binghai C.
Effects of different dietary energy and protein levels and sex on growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of F1 Angus × Chinese Xiangxi yellow cattle
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 2014; volume 5, Article number: 21

16. Moody WG., Little JE, Thrift FA, Cundiff LV, Kemp, JD. Influence of length of feeding a high roughage ration on quantative and qualitative characteristics of beef. Journal of Animal Science 1970; 31, 866-873.

17. Moody WG. Quantitative and qualitative differences in beef from various energy regimes. A study presented at the 29th annual reciprocal meat conference of the american meat science association 1976.

18. National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle (7th rev. ed.), National Academy Science 2001; Washington, DC.

19. Nürnberg K, Wegner J, Ender K. Factors influencing fat composition in muscle and adipose tissue of farm animals. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1998; 56, 145–156.

20. Owens FN, Gill DR, Secrist DS, Coleman SW. Review of some aspects of growth and development of feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 1995; 73:3152–3172. doi:10.2527/1995.73103152x

21. Prior RL, kohlimeier RH, Cundiff LV, Dikeman ME. Influence of Dietary Energy and Protein on Growth and Carcass Composition in Different Biological Types of Cattle, Journal of Animal Science 1977; Volume 45, Issue 1, July 1977; Pages 132–146, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1977.451132x

22. Renand G, Picard B, Touraille C, Berge P, Lepetit J. Relationship between muscle characteristics and meat quality traits of young Charolais bulls. Meat Science 2001; 59:49–60. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00051-1.

23. SAS. SAS/OR 9.3. User’s guide: mathematical programming examples. Cary, NC: SAS Institute. 2012.

24. Seoyoung J, Mingyung L, Jakyeom S, Jeong-Hoon K, Dong-Keun K, Seongwon S. High-level dietary crude protein decreased backfat thickness and increased carcass yield score in finishing Hanwoo beef cattle (Bos taurus coreanae). J Anim Sci Technol 2021; 63(5):1064-1075

25. Snedecor and Cochran. Statistical methods (6th ed.). 1976; Ames, Iowa: The Iowa State University Press.

26. Trenkle, A. Protein feeding strategies for lean gain. In: Proc. 54th Minnesota
Nutrition Conference and Alltech, Inc. Technical Symposium 1993; pp. 127-136.
Bloomington, MN.

27. Trenkle, A. Programmed feeding of protein to finishing beef steers. AS Leaflet R1774, 1–3.
Beef Research Report 2002; Iowa State University

28. Vestergaard M, Oksbjerg N, Henckel P. Influence of feeding intensity, grazing and finishing feeding on muscle fibre characteristics and meat colour of semitendinosus, longissimus dorsi and supraspinatus muscles of young bulls. Meat Science 2000; 54:177–185. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00097-2.

29. Waldrip HM, Todd RW, Cole NA. Prediction of nitrogen excretion by beef cattle: A meta-analysis. J. Anim. Sci. 2013; 91, 4290–4302.

30. Wood JD, Enser M, Fisher AV, Nute GR, Sheard PR, Richardson RI, Hughes SI, Whittington FM. Fat deposition, fatty acid composition and meat quality. A review. Meat Science 2008; 78:343–358. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.019.

31. Zuidhof MJ. Precision livestock feeding: matching nutrient supply with nutrient requirements of individual animals. J. Appl. Poult. 2020; Volume 29, Issue 1 Res. 29:11–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japr.2019.12.009.