Main Article Content
additives, label, food safety, knowledge
Introduction. To gain as more benefits as possible from food labels, the level of knowledge of consumers in Romania about the information on the food labels needs to be assessed.
Aim. The study aims to provide practical results and orientations based on consumers’ perspectives, not only for food processors, retailers, but also for designing efficient labels so that for the purchase of food and semi-prepared products they allow the choice of discerning products that meet the requirements buyer such as: caloric content, sugar, allergens, additives.
Methods. To complete this pilot, cross-sectional study, an on-line evaluation questionnaire was developed and disseminated between December 2016 and February 2017.
Results. Of the total of 476 people surveyed, 96 of them are men (namely 20.16%) and the rest are women (namely 79.84%). Of those surveyed 214 (namely 45%) of them go shopping at least 3 times a week, those in the rural area have only 36% (namely 32 people). Most 348 people (73%) shop in the supermarket or hypermarket. Residency plays an important role in the knowledge of food additives, people in the rural area have less knowledge than those from the urban area with regard to the meaning of "E" on the packaging (OR = 3.13, 95% CI: 1.86-5.26), do not know that food additives are not harmful (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.36-0.94), as well as about adequate knowledge of food additives(OR=3.46, 95 % CI: 2.01-5.95).
Conclusions. An information on the significance of food additives would be beneficial to both the population and the country. This would allow the choice of foods that correspond to the health of the buyer. Awareness and information of the population of the potential elimination or addition of food additives and their function in the final product.
2. Reardon T, Codron JM, Busch L, Bingen J, Harris C. Global change in agri-food grades and standards: agribusiness strategic responses in developing countries. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review. 2001;2,p.421–435.
3. Busch L, Bain C. New! Improved? The transformation of the global agri-food system. Rural Sociology. 2004;69,p.321–346.
4. Deshingkar P, Kulkarni U, Rao L, Rao S. Changing food systems in India: response-sharing and marketing arrangements for vegetable production in Andhra Pradesh. Development Policy Review. 2003;21,p.627–639.
5. WHO. World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases. Geneva. WHO;2014.298 p.
6. WHO. World Health Organization. Global report on diabetes. Geneva: WHO. 2016
7. WHO. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO European Ministerial Conference on Counteracting Obesity: Conference Report. 2009. http://www.euro.who.int/__ data/assets/pdf_file/0006/96459/E90143.pdf. [Accessed 14 December 2018].
8. Popkin BM, Adair LS, Ng SW. NOW AND THEN: Global nutrition transition: the pandemic of obesity in developing countries. Nutr Rev. 2012;70,p.3–21.
9. Avram C, Avram L, Ruta F, Georgescu IM, Rus V. Consumer profile in terms of food label reading in Mures country, Romania– a pilot study: Consumer profile in terms of food label reading. Progr Nutr [Internet]. 2020Sep.4 [cited 2020Nov.3];22(4). Available from: https://www.mattioli1885journals.com/index.php/progressinnutrition/article/view/9225
10. Kallscheuer N. Engineered Microorganisms for the Production of Food Additives Aproved by the European Union-A Systematic Analysis. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2018,9.
11. REG UE. Regulamentul (UE) Nr. 1169/2011 al Parlamentului European si al Consiliului. 2011. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ro/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32011R1169. [Accessed 14 December 2018]
12. REG UE. Regulamentul (CE) Nr. 1333/2008 al Parlamentului European si al Consiliului din 16 decembrie 2008 privind aditivii alimentari. 2008. https://eurex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:354:0016:0033:RO:PDF. [Accessed 14 December 2018]
13. Grunert KG, Wills JM. A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels. J Public Health. 2007;15,p.385-99.
14. Petrescu DC, Petrescu-Mag RM, Bran F, Rădulescu CV. Consumer Food Security and Labeling Intervention on Food Products through Public Policies in Romania. Amfiteatru Economic. 2018;20(47), p.99-115
15. INS. Institutul National de Statistică. Cifra de afaceri din comerţul cu amănuntul în luna decembrie 2018, http://www.insse.ro/cms/sites/default/files/com_presa/com_pdf/com_amanunt_12r18.pdf. [Accessed 14 December 2018]
16. Food safety in the EU. 2019. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/corporate_publications/files/Eurobarometer2019_Food-safety-in-the-EU_Full-report.pdf. [Accessed 27 October 2020]
17. Szűcs V, Fülöp Á, Juhász R. Analysis of age differences in the risk perception of food additives: Results of focus group interviews. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Alimentaria. 2014; 7,p.96-108.
18. Stevens LJ, Kuczek T, Burgess JR, Stochelski MA, Arnold LE, Galland L. Mechanisms of behavioral, atopic, and other reactions to artificial food colors in children. Nutr. Rev. 2013;71,p.268–281.
19. Suez J, Korem T, Zeevi D, Zilberman-Schapira G, Thaiss CA, Maza O, et al. Artificial sweeteners induce glucose intolerance by altering the gutmicrobiota. Nature. 2014;514,p.181–186
20. Goyal B, Goyal P. Manufacturing of Potato Chips and its Quality Improvement. J Food Process Technol. 2018;9:12, 1000765.
21. Mulders MDGH, Corneille O, Klein O. Label reading, numeracy and food & nutrition involvement. Apetite. 2018;128,p.214-222
22. Cowburn G, Stockley L. Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: A systematic review. Public Health Nutrition. 2005;8(1),p.21–28.
23. Iacob OM, Bacarea A, Ruta FD, Bacarea VC, Gliga FI, Buicu F, et al. Anthropometric indices of the newborns related with some lifestyle parameters of women during pregnancy in Tirgu Mures region-a pilot study. PROGRESS IN NUTRITION 2018; 20(4), 585-591. doi: 10.23751/pn.v20i4.7080
24. Calin A, , Adrian G, Laura A. A Formal Model Based Automated Decision Making. 2020;46, 573-579. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.03.083
25. Avram C, Gligor A, Avram EL. (2012). New approach on optimal decision making based on formal automata models. Procedia Economics and Finance 2012; 3, 852-857. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00240-7
26. Calin A, Laura AE, Adrian G. (2014). Formal Models for Describing Mathematical Programming Problem. Procedia Economics and Finance 2014; 15, 1501-1506. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00617-0