Effect of Dried Molassed Sugar Beet Pulp and Molasses on Silage Quality of Forage Turnip (Brassica rapa L. )

Main Article Content

Besime Doğan Daş
Nihat Denek

Keywords

Forage turnip (Brassica rapa L.), silage, dried molassed sugar beet pulp, molasses

Abstract

Öz        


Bu çalışmada, farklı seviyelerde kurutulmuş molaslanmış şeker pancarı hamuru (DMSBP) ve melas (M) ilavesinin yem şalgam ( Brassica rapa L.) silajlarının fermantasyon kalitesi üzerindeki etkisini belirlemek amaçlanmıştır . Yem şalgamı DMSBP (% 0, 7, 10 ve% 15) ve M (% 0, 1, 2 ve% 3) ilave edildi. DMSBP ve M ilavesi, yem şalgam silajlarının silaj kalitesini ve fermantasyon parametrelerini geliştirdi. I in Vitro organik madde sindirim (IVOMD) ve yem şalgam silajlarının metabolik enerji (ME) DMSBP ilave (p <0.01) arttı. PH, amonyak, nitrojen (NH 3 N / TN) değerleri DMSBP ve M ve aerobik stabilite değerinin ilavesi ile azalmış arttı (ile CO azalma 2değerleri) DMSBP ilavesiyle (P <0.01). Silajların laktik, propionik ve bütirik asit değerleri DMSBP ilavesiyle azaldı, ancak asetik asit değerleri arttı (P <0.01). M ilavesiyle laktik ve asetik değerler artarken, silajların propiyonik ve bütirik asit değerleri M ilavesiyle azalmıştır (P <0.01). Sonuç olarak, yem şalgamı ( Brassica rapa L. ) hiçbir katkı maddesi veya farklı DMSBP ve M seviyeleri eklenemez, ancak% 7 DMSBP ve% 3 M katkı maddesi ile hazırlanan silajlar yüksek aerobik stabiliteye ve düşük silaj amonyak azot değerlerine sahipti. Bununla birlikte, bu sonuçlar in vivo besleme çalışmalarıyla desteklenmelidir .

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 62 | PDF Downloads 36

References

1. Ayres L, Clements B. Forage brassicas quality crops for livestock production. Agfact P2, 2002; 1(13): 1-3.
2. Fernandes GM, Possenti RA, Teixeira de Mattos W, Schammass EA and Junior EF. In situ degradability and selected ruminal constituents of sheep fed with peanut forage hay. Archives of animal nutrition 2013; 67(5):393-405.
3. Davies DR, Merry RJ, Williams AP, Bakewell EL, Leemans DK, Tweed JKS. Proteolysis during ensilage of forages varying in soluble sugar content. Journal of Dairy Science 1998;81:444-453.
4. Marvin HH, Jung J. Use of brassica crops to extend the grazing season. The Pennsylvania State University, Agronomy Facts 2008;33:1-4. https://extension.psu.edu/use-of-brassicacrops-to-extend-the-grazing-season? (Accessed 14 May 2020).
5. Koch DW, Karakaya A. Extending the grazing season with turnips and other brassicas. Wyoming co-operative Extension Service Bull. 1998; B-1051.
6. Rao SC, Horn FP. Planting season and harvest date effects on dry matter production and nutritional value of brassica spp. in the southern great plains. Agronomy Journal 1986; 78(2): 327-333.
7. Cetin I, Duru Arslan A. Determination of some quality properties of ensiled forage turnip (Brassica rapa L.) with different additives. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 2020; 29: 2766-2771.
8. Gumus H, Oguz Karakas F, Oguz N, Bugdaycı KE, Kuter E. The effects of different additives on the fermentation and physical characteristics of lenox silage. Journal of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Erciyes University 2020;17(1): 39-44.
9. Hart SP, Horn FP. Ensiling characteristics and digestibility of combinations of turnips and wheat straw. Journal of Animal Science 1987; 64(6): 1790-1800.
10.Kaiser AG 2004. Silage additives. Chapter 7 in Successful Silage. Kaiser AG, Piltz JW, Burns HM, Griffiths NW. (eds). Dairy Australia and New South Wales Department of Primary Industries. New South Wales, Australia.
11.Şakalar B, Kamalak A. The use of dried molasses sugar beet pulp in the silo of the alfalfa plant. Anadolu Agriculture Science Journal 2016; 31:157-164.
12. Polan CE, Stieve DE, Garrett JL. Protein preservation and ruminal degradation of ensiled forage treated with heat, formic acid, ammonia or microbial inoculant. Journal of Dairy Science 1998; 81:765-776.
13. Suzuki M, Lund CW. Improved gas liquid chromatography for simultaneous determination of volatile fatty acids and lactic acid in silage. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 1980;28:1040-1041.
14.AOAC, 1990. Official method of analysis. Association of official analytical chemistry pp.66-88. 15th.edition. Washington, DC. USA.
15.Ashbell G, Weinberg ZG, Azrieli A, Hen Y, Horev B. A Simple System to Study the Aerobic Determination of Silages. Canadian Agricultural Engineering 1991; 34: 171-175.
16.Playne MJ, McDonald P. The buffering constituents of herbage and of silage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 1966; 17(6): 264-268.
17.Dubois M, Giles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebes PA, Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry 1956; 28: 350-356.
18.AOAC, 2005. International, 18th ed. Association of official analytical chemists, Washington DC, USA.
19.Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods of dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 1991; 74: 3583-3597.
20.Menke KH, Raab L, Salewski A, Steingass H, Fritz D, Schneider W. The Estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feeding stuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. Journal of Agricultural Science 1979; 93(1): 217-222.
21.Menke KH, Raab L, Salewski A, Steingass H, Fritz D, Schneider W. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Development 1988; 28:7-55.
22.SPPS, 2008. Inc, SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version, Chicago.
23.Sibanda S, Jingura RM, Topps JH. The effect of level of inclusion of the legume desmodium uncinatum and the use of molasses or ground maize as additives on the chemical composition of grass and maize legume silages. Animal Feed Science and Technology 1997; 68: 295-305.
24.Slottner D, Bertilsson J. Effect of ensiling technology on protein degradation during ensilage. Animal Feed Science and Technology 2006; 127(1–2): 101-111.
25.Bolsen KK, Ashbell G, Weinberg ZG. Silage fermentation and silage additives review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 1996; 9(5): 483-494.
26.Rondahl T, Bertilsson J, Martinsson K. Effects of maturity stage, wilting and acid treatment on crude protein fractions and chemical composition of whole crop pea silages (Pisum sativum L.). Animal Feed Science and Technology 2011;163, 11-19.
27.Sing R, Kamra DN, Jakhmola RC. Ensiling of leguminous green forages in combination with different dry roughages and molasses. Animal Feed Science and Technology 1985; 12; 133-139.
28.Nadeau EM, Buxton DR, Russell JR, Alliso MJ, Young JW. Enzyme, bacterial inoculant and formic acid effects on silage composition of orchardgrass and alfalfa. Journal of Dairy Science 2000;83:1487-1502.
29.Carpintero MC, Holding AC, Mcdonald P. Fermentation studies on lucerne. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture 1969;20; 677-681.
30.McDonald P, Henderson AR, Heron SJE. The biochemistry of silage. Second Edition. Chalcombe Publication, Marlow, UK. England. 1991. p. 340.
31.Wilkinson JM, Davies DR. The aerobic stability of silage: key findings and recent developments. Grass and Forage Science 2012;68: 1-19.
32.Woolford MK. The detrimental effects of air on silage. Journal of Applied. Bacteriology 1990; 68:101-116.
33.Jatkauskas J, Vrotniakiene V, Ohlsson C, Lund B. The effects of three silage inoculants on aerobic stability in grass, clover-grass, lucerne and maize silages. Agricultural and Food Science 2013; 22(1): 137-144.
34.Kung JRL. 2010: Understanding the biology of silage preservation maximize quality and protect the enviroment. In Proceeding California Alfalfa and Forage Symposium, Visalia, 41-54.
35.Danner H, Holzer M, Mayrhuber E, Braun R. Acetic acid increases stability of silages under aerobic conditions. Journal of Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2003; 69: 562–567.
36.McDonald P. 1981. The biochemistry of silage. John Wiley and Sons. Ltd.
37.Kung JRL, Shaver RD, Grant RJ, Schmidt RJ. (2018). Silage review: Interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. Journal of Dairy Science 2018; 101(5): 4020-4033.