Main Article Content
flexible work arrangements, working conditions, occupational health and safety, longitudinal study
Background: Starting from February 2020, in Italy most organizations have had a forced transition to flexible working practice - called “smart working in emergency” – due to the Covid-19 epidemic outbreak. This allowed to continue work activities and services and contributed to contain the risk of infection in different sectors, particularly in the public administration.
Objectives: This follow up study focussed on a panel of 187 workers from the Italian Workers’ Compensation Authority taking part to a pilot project “Smart Working in INAIL” from 2019 to 2020.
The aim was to investigate the effects of work organization on work attitudes, work-life balance and health outcomes before and after the introduction of the smart working.
Methods: The data were collected in two times through a web-based questionnaire. The first wave aimed to collect information up to one month before the implementation of the smart working. The second wave aimed to collected information about potential changes happened after one year of smart working.
Results: This study showed that high demands, low control and low social support might lead to worst well-being, less satisfaction with work and have an effect on work engagement and work-life balance. Particularly, improving social support can moderate the negative impact of high strain on well-being, preventing work-life imbalance and risk of isolation.
Discussion: Findings and future perspectives are discussed to support stakeholders in defining policies and practices concerning health and wellbeing at work while preserving productivity, for a successful implementation of smart working in the public administration.
Moretti A, Menna F, Aulicino M, et al. Characterization of Home Working Population during COVID-19 Emergency: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(17):6284. Published 2020 Aug 28. doi:10.3390/ijerph17176284
Mutti A. Smart working and tele-conferences during the lockdown caused by COVID-19 bring new editorial guidelines. Med Lav. 2020;111(4):247-248. Published 2020 Aug 31. doi:10.23749/mdl.v111i4.1034
Iannotta M, Meret C, Marchetti G. Defining Leadership in Smart Working Contexts: A Concept Synthesis. Front Psychol. 2020;11:556933. Published 2020 Sep 16. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.556933
De Menezes LM, Kelliher C. Flexible working and performance: A systematic review of the evidence for a business case. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2011; 13: 452–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00301.x
De Menezes LM, Kelliher C. Flexible working, individual performance, and employee attitudes: Comparing formal and informal arrangements. Hum. Resou. Manag. 2016;56, 1051–1070. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21822
ten Brummelhuis LL, Bakker AB, Hetland J, Keulemans L. Do new ways of working foster work engagement?. Psicothema. 2012;24(1):113-120
Casey PR, Grzywacz JG. Employee Health and Well-Being: The Role of Flexibility and Work–Family Balance, Psychol. Manag. J. 2008;11:1,31-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10887150801963885
Joyce K, Pabayo R, Critchley JA, Bambra C. Flexible working conditions and their effects on employee health and wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;2010(2):CD008009. Published 2010 Feb 17. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008009.pub2
Gajendran RS, Harrison DA. The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. J Appl Psychol. 2007 Nov;92(6):1524-41. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524. PMID: 18020794.
Moen P, Kelly EL, Fan W, et al. Does a Flexibility/Support Organizational Initiative Improve High-Tech Employees’ Well-Being? Evidence from the Work, Family, and Health Network. Am. Sociol. Rev. 2016;81(1), 134–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415622391
Swanberg JE, McKechnie SP, Ojhac MU, James JB. Schedule control, supervisor support and work engagement: A winning combination for workers in hourly jobs? J. Vocat. Behav. 2011; 79:1:613-624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.04.012
Allen TD, Johnson RC, Kiburz KM, Shockley KM. Work–Family Conflict And Flexible Work Arrangements: Deconstructing Flexibility. Pers. Psychol. 2013; 66:345–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12012
McNall LA, Masuda AD, Nicklin JM. Flexible work arrangements, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions: the mediating role of work-to-family enrichment. J Psychol. 2010;144(1):61-81. doi:10.1080/00223980903356073
Peters P, Dulk LD, Van der Lippe T. The effects of time-spatial flexibility and new working conditions on employees’ work–life balance: the Dutch case. Community Work Fam. 2009;12:3, 279-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800902968907
Descatha A, Sembajwe G, Pega F, et al. The effect of exposure to long working hours on stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury. Environ Int. 2020;142:105746. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2020.105746
Li J, Pega F, Ujita Y, et al. The effect of exposure to long working hours on ischaemic heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury. Environ Int. 2020;142:105739. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2020.105739
Raykov T, Rodenberg C, Narayanan A. Optimal Shortening of Multiple-Component Measuring Instruments: A Latent Variable Modeling Procedure. Struct. Equ. Model. 2015; 22(2), 227-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.935927
Cox T, Griffiths AJ. The assessment of psychosocial hazards at work. In Shabracq MJ, Winnubst JAM, Cooper CL (Eds.) Handbook of Work and Health Psychology. Chichester: Wiley & Sons. 1995
Rondinone BM, Persechino B, Castaldi T, et al. Work-related stress risk assessment in Italy: the validation study of health safety and executive indicator tool. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2012;34(4):392-399.
Marinaccio A, Ferrante P, Corfiati M, et al. The relevance of socio-demographic and occupational variables for the assessment of work-related stress risk. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1157. Published 2013 Dec 10. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-1157
Wood S, Ghezzi V, Barbaranelli C, et al. Assessing the Risk of Stress in Organizations: Getting the Measure of Organizational-Level Stressors. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2776. Published 2019 Dec 20. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02776
Schulte PA, Delclos G, Felknor SA, Chosewood LC. Toward an Expanded Focus for Occupational Safety and Health: A Commentary. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(24):4946. Published 2019 Dec 6. doi:10.3390/ijerph16244946
Schaufeli W, Shimazu A, Hakanen J, et al. An Ultra-Short Measure for Work Engagement. The UWES-3 Validation Across Five Countries. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2019; 35(4), 577–591. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000430
International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) 2015 - Work Orientations IV. Variable Report. Documentation release 2017/08/30. GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences.
Cortese CG, Quaglino GP:. The measurement of job satisfaction in organizations: a comparison between a facet scale and a single-item measure. TPM Test Psychom Methodol Appl Psychol. 2006; 13(4):305-16.
Simon JG, De Boer JB, Joung IM, et al. How is your health in general? A qualitative study on self-assessed health. Eur J Public Health. 2005;15(2):200-208. doi:10.1093/eurpub/cki102
Topp CW, Østergaard SD, Søndergaard S, Bech P. The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: a systematic review of the literature. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):167-176. doi:10.1159/000376585
Greene WH. Econometric analysis. New York (NY): Pearson, 2018.
Johnson JV, Hall EM. Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease: a cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population. Am J Public Health. 1988 Oct;78(10):1336-42. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.10.1336
Karasek RA. Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Adm. Sci. Q. 1979: 24, 285-308. doi:10.2307/2392498
Kelloway EK, Gottlieb BH. The effect of alternative work arrangements on women's well-being: a demand-control model. Womens Health. 1998;4(1):1-18.
Kelly EL, Moen P. Rethinking the Clockwork of Work: Why Schedule Control May Pay Off at Work and at Home. Adv Dev Hum Resour. 2007;9(4):487-506. doi:10.1177/1523422307305489
Häusser JA, Mojzisch A, Niesel M, Schulz-Hardt S. Ten years on: A review of recent research on the Job Demand–Control (-Support) model and psychological well-being, Work Stress. 2010;24(1):1-35. doi: 10.1080/02678371003683747
Samad A, Reaburn P. Di Milia L. The contribution of job strain, social support and working hours in explaining work–family conflict. Asia Pacific J. Hum. Resour. 2015;53: 281-295. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12058
Vassos M, Nankervis K, Skerry T, Lante K. Can the job demand-control-(support) model predict disability support worker burnout and work engagement? J. Intellect. Dev. Disabil. 2019;44(2):139-149. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2017.1310818
Dragano N, Lunau T. Technostress at work and mental health: concepts and research results. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2020;33(4):407-413. doi:10.1097/YCO.0000000000000613
Berg-Beckhoff G, Nielsen G, Ladekjær Larsen E. Use of information communication technology and stress, burnout, and mental health in older, middle-aged, and younger workers - results from a systematic review. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2017 Apr;23(2):160-171. doi: 10.1080/10773525.2018.1436015
Tarafdar M, Ragu-Nathan TS, Ragu-Nathan B. Tu Q. The Impact of Technostress on Productivity. J Manag Inf Syst. 2007;24(1):301-328. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109
Brod C. Technostress: The Human Cost of the Computer Revolution. Reading (MA): Addison Wesley, 1984