Bioethics: beyond the boundaries of disciplines
Main Article Content
Keywords
care ethics, environment, interdisciplinarity, one health, circular health, education, integral ecology, human sciences, vulnerability
Abstract
The extension of our moral horizon beyond spatial and temporal boundaries constitutes a significant stage in the development of an authentically human ethic.
The guiding idea is that of the expanding circle, i.e. a circle that gradually widens to encompass ever larger and more intertwined areas, in a planetary dimension.
In such a vision, the challenge posed to bioethics should be the elaboration of an ethic of responsibility on a global scale as the only one adequate to address the crucial problems of survival for a humanity understood as a community of destiny.
The challenges posed by the complexity of the current social context call for an education geared towards the development of transversal skills through a constant multi- and interdisciplinary approach and with the aid of a plurality of conceptual and methodological tools.
The authors describe what they experienced when teaching doctors and dentists on a joint training course at the University of Genoa.
References
2. Cavaliere G. The problem with reproductive freedom. Procreation beyond procreators’ interests. Med Health Care and Philos 2020; 23:131–40.
3. Ciliberti R, Gulino M, Gorini I. New Italian law about end of life: Self–determination and shared care pathway [La nuova normativa Italiana sul fine vita: L'autodeterminazione e la condivisione del percorso di cura] Recenti Progr Med 2018; 109(5): 267–71.
4. Palazzani L. The pandemic and the ethical dilemma of limited resources: Who to treat? Bioethics Update. 2020; 6(2):67–79.
5. Jahr F. Bio–Ethik. Eine Umschau über die ethischen Beziehungen des Menschen zu Tier und Pflanze. Kosmos. Handweiser für Naturfreunde; 1927.
6. Potter VR. Global Bioethics. Building on the Leopold Legacy. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press; 1988.
7. Manti F. La bioetica planetaria e le sue declinazioni. 25 anni di Bioetica a Napoli. I protagonisti e le idee. R. Prodromo (Edited by) Milano–Udine: Mimesis; 2020:73–84.
8. Wolf-Braun B, Wilke HJ. Patientenautonomie und Aufklärung - Ethische und rechtliche Aspekte der Aufklärung [Patient autonomy and informed consent - ethical and legal issues]. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2015; 50(3):202-9.
9. Ciliberti R, Alfano L, Baldelli I, De Stefano F, Bonsignore A. Self-determination, healthcare treatment and minors in Italian clinical practice: ethical, psychological, juridical and medical–legal profiles. Acta Biomed 2018; 89(1):34–40.
10. Battistuzzi L, Ciliberti R, Bruno W, Turchetti D, Varesco L, De Stefano F. Communication of clinically useful next–generation sequencing results to at–risk relatives of deceased research participants: Toward active disclosure? Clin Oncol 2013; 31(32):4164–5.
11. Battistuzzi L, Ciliberti R, Forzano F, De Stefano F. Regulating the communication of genetic risk information: The Italian legal approach to questions of confidentiality and disclosure. Clin Genet 2012; 82(3):205–9.
12. Martini M, Penco S, Baldelli I, Biolatti B, Ciliberti R. An ethics for the living world: Operation methods of animal ethics committees in Italy. Ann Ist Super Sanità 2015; 51(3):244–7.
13. Baldelli I, Massaro A, Penco S, Bassi AM, Patuzzo S, Ciliberti R. Conscientious objection to animal experimentation in Italian universities. Animals (Basel) 2017; 7(3):24.
14. Khaji A, Larijani B, Ghodsi SM, Mohagheghi MA, Khankeh HR, Saadat S, Tabatabaei SM, Khorasani–Zavareh D. Ethical Issues in Technological Disaster: A Systematic Review of Literature. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2018; 6(4):269–76.
15. Battaglia L. Uomo, natura, animali. Per una bioetica della complessità. Pavia: Altravista; 2016.
16. Virgolino A, Antunes F, Santos O, Costa A, Matos MGd, Bicho M. et al. Towards a Global Perspective of Environmental Health: Defining the Research Grounds of an Institute of Environmental Health. Sustainability 2020; 12: 8963.
17. Capps B. One health ethics. Bioethics 2022; 36(4):348–55.
18. Pope Francis, Laudato si'. Cinisello Balsamo: Edizioni San Paolo; 2015.
19. Morin E. Sette lezioni sul pensiero globale. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore; 2016.
20. Landires I, Nuñez–Samudio V, Apraez–Ippolito G, Castro G. Planetary health: a new sociopolitical framework isurgentlyneeded. Lancet 2018; 391(10126):1158. 8
21. Kemp P, Rendtorff, J. The Barcelona Declaration. Towards an Integrated Approach to Basic Ethical Principles. Synth Philos 2008; 23 (2):239–51.
22. Rendtorff JD. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw: autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability-towards a foundation of bioethics and biolaw. Med Health Care Philos 2002; 5(3):235–44.
23. Ceruti M, Bellusci F. Inhabiting complexity. The challenge of a common destiny. Milano: Mimesis; 2020.
24. Valera L, López Barreda R. Bioethics and COVID-19: Considering the Social Determinants of Health. Frontiers in Medicine 2022; 9. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.824791/full
25. Kuhn L. Complexity and Educational Research: A Critical Reflection. Educ Philos Theory 2008; 40:177–89.
26. Southerland SA. Settlage J. Humanistic science education: Updating our collective consciousness and offering fresh consideration. Science Education 2022; 106:479– 481.
27. Power CN. The Power of Education: Education for All, Development, Globalisation and UNESCO. London: Springer; 2015.
28. Battaglia L. L’idea di salute globale. Una sfida per la bioetica. https://www.unisob.na.it/ateneo/c008/c008_r3_battaglia.pdf
29. Doldi M, Petralia P. Curare la persona. The human dimension of medicine. Fidenza: Mattioli; 2021.
30. Patuzzo S, De Stefano F, Ciliberti R. The Italian code of medical deontology. Historical, ethical and legal issues. Acta Biomed 2018; 89 (2):157– 64.
31. Doukas DJ, Mccullough L, Wear S. Perspective: Medical Education in Medical Ethics and Humanities as the Foundation for Developing Medical Professionalism. Acad med 2012; 87: 334–41.