The Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale in Team Sports; Validity and Reliability Study

Main Article Content

Yucel Uysal
Turhan Toros
Mehmet Cagri Cetin
Funda Coskun Ozyol
Emre Serin
Sinan Guzel
Rabia Yildiz Ozturk

Keywords

Team sports, athlete, doping, performance, attitude

Abstract

Study Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate performance enhancement attitudes of active licensed athletes in team sports. Methods: The research sample of this study consists of 371 actively licensed athletes aged 18 and over in team sports (football, basketball, volleyball, and handball). The average age of the athletes is 24.42 ± 2.12. Participation in the study was carried out on a voluntary and confidential basis. Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale, developed by Petroczi (2002) and adapted to Turkish by Yıldız & Toros (2018), was used as a data collection tool. Results: In the analysis of the data, the Cronbach alpha coefficient test and the Pearson Correlation Coefficient were used to reveal the test-retest value. The Cronbach alpha coefficient for the team athletes of the scale was 0.84, and the test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.88. Conclusion: According to the research findings, the results of the reliability analysis reveal that the scale can be used on licensed athletes in team sports.

Abstract 384 | PDF Downloads 347

References

1. Erkiner, K. (2008, May 17). The Reality of Doping in Sports. Sports Law Institute: Retrieved from http://www.sporhukuku.org/makaleler/107-sporda-doping-gercei-av-ksmet-erkner.html
2. Eroz, M. F. (2007). Determining the views and knowledge level of athletes doing athletics, wrestling, judo and weightlifting on doping and ergogenic assistance at national level. Unpublished Master's thesis, Dumlupınar University, Kütahya.
3. Güler, D., Şenel, Ö., Kaya, İ., Ersoy, A., & Kürkçü, R. (2004). Knowledge and Levels of Utilization of Senior Turkish Athletes in Different Individual Branches About Ergogenic Auxiliaries. Spormetre, 2(2), 41-47.
4. Baysaling, Ö. (2000). Doping in Every Aspect of Sports: Harms, Doping and Cures, Combating Doping. Istanbul: Ilpress Printing and Publishing.
5. Burstin, S. (1963). La Lucha Contra el Dopage. Revista de Derecho Sportiva, 3(8-9), 583-636.
6. Anshel, M. H. (1991). A survey of elite athletes on the perceived causes of using banned drugs in sport. Journal of Sport Behavior, 14, 283-307.
7. Yesalis, C., Herrick, R., & Buckley, W. (1988). Self-reported use of anabolic androgenic steroids by elite power lifters. The Physician and Sports Medicine(16), 91-100.
8. Fuller, J. R., & La Fountain, M. J. (1987). Performance-enhancing drugs in sport. Adolescence(22), 969-976.
9. Sevim, Y. (2007). Training Information. Ankara: Nobel Publication Distribution.
10. Kargili, H. (2002). The Effects of Doping Use in Terms of Sports Ethics and Athletes and Anti-Doping Studies. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Dumlupınar University, Kütahya.
11. Petroczi, A., & Aidman, E. (2009). Measuring Explicit Attitude Toward Doping: Review of the Psychometric Properties of the Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(3), 390-396.
12. Yıldız, R., & Toros, T. (2018). Adaptation of Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale to Turkish: Validity and Reliability Study. Gaziantep University Journal of Sport Sciences, 3(4), 48-59.
13. Morente-Sanchez, J., Mateo-March, M., & Zabala, M. (2014). Attitudes towards Doping and Related Experience in Spanish National Cycling Teams According to Different Olympic Disciplines. PLoS ONE, 8(8).
14. Petroczi A. (2002) Exploring the doping dilemma in elite sport: Can athletes’ attitudes be responsible for doping? Published Doctor of Philosophy dissertation, University of Northern Colorado, USA.