Examination of Physical Activity and Quality of Life of University Students in the COVID-19 Pandemic Period

Main Article Content

Ali Osman Kıvrak


Physical Activity, University Student, Quality of Life, Covid-19


Study Objectives: With this study, it was aimed to examine the physical activity and quality of life of university students during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Methods: A total of 495 university students, 192 female, and 303 males, participated in the study. While the personal information form created by the researcher was used for socio-demographic data, the short form of the "International Physical Activity Questionnaire" was used to determine the physical activity level, and the "SF-36" scale was used to determine the quality of life. The homogeneity and variances of the data were tested, the independent samples t test was used for pairwise comparisons, the One-Way ANOVA was used for multiple comparisons, and the Tukey HSD test was used to determine the source of difference. Results: While no statistical change was observed in the quality-of-life dimensions depending on the gender factor, it was determined that the value for females was statistically higher than the value for males in physical activity walking and total MET values (p<0.05). No statistical change was observed in physical activity and quality of life values depending on the accommodation factor. While no change was observed in the quality-of-life dimensions depending on the age factor, it was determined that the values of the 23-27 age group students were statistically higher than the other age groups in walking and Total MET values (p<0.05).  Conclusion: In the light of these findings, it can be thought that females’ higher MET values are related to their hormonal tendency to gain weight compared to males, increased leisure time at home, and aesthetic concerns such as looking good. For the high MET value of the 23-27 age group, it can be suggested that the age group has specific characteristics and an age-related active lifestyle.


Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 23 | PDF Downloads 41


Ammar A, Brach M, Trabelsi K, Chtourou H, Boukhris O, Masmoudi L, Bouaziz B, Bentlage E, How D, Ahmed M, et al. Effects of COVID-19 Home Confinement on Eating Behaviour and Physical Activity: Results of the ECLB-COVID19 International Online Survey. Nutrients 2020; 12(6): 1-13.
2. Trabelsi K, Ammar A, Masmoudi L, Boukhris O, Chtourou H, Bouaziz B, Brach M, Bentlage E, How D, Ahmed M, et al. Globally altered sleep patterns and physical activity levels by confinement in 5056 individuals: ECLB COVID-19 international online survey. Biology of Sport 2021; 38(4): 495–506.
3. Ammar A, Trabelsi K, Brach M, Chtourou H, Boukhris O, Masmoudi L, Bouaziz B, Bentlage E, How D, Ahmed M, et al. Effects of home confinement on mental health and lifestyle behaviours during the COVID-19 outbreak: insights from the ECLB-COVID19 multicentere study. Biology of Sport 2021; 38(1): 9–21.
4. Chtourou H, Trabelsi K, H’mida C, Boukhris O, Glenn JM, Brach M, Bentlage E, Bott N, Shephard RJ, Ammar A, Bragazzi NL. Staying physically active during the quarantine and self-isolation period for controlling and mitigating the COVID-19 pandemics: An overview of the literature. Frontiers in Psychology 2020; 11: 1-11.
5. Seligman ME. Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Policy 2011; 27(3): 60–61.
6. Özer K. Physical fitness. Ankara: Nobel Publications 2010.
7. Öztürk M. A research on reliability and validity of international physical activity questionnaire and determination of physical activity level in university students. Hacettepe University, Institute of Health Sciences, Master's Thesis, Ankara, 2005.
8. Vanhees L, Lefevre J, Philippaerts R, Martens M, Huygens W, Trooster T, Beunen G. How to Assess Physical Activity? How to Assess Physical Fitness? European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. 2005; 12(2): 102-114.
9. WHO. Active ageing: A policy framework. Madrid, Spain 2002.
10. Chipuer HM, Bramston P, Pretty G. Determinants of subjective quality of life among rural adolescents: A developmental perspective. Social Indicators Research 2003; 61: 79–95.
11. Litwin H, Shiovitz-Ezra S. The association between activity and wellbeing in later life: What really matters? Ageing & Society 2006; 26(2): 225–243.
12. Ammar A, Mueller P, Trabelsi K, Chtourou H, Boukhris O, Masmoudi L, Bouaziz B, Brach M, Schmicker M, Bentlage E, et al. Psychological consequences of COVID-19 home confinement: The ECLB-COVID19 multicenter study. PLOS ONE 2020; 15(11): 1-13.
13. Hawryluck L, Gold WL, Robinson S, Pogorski S, Galea S, Styra R. SARS control and psychological effects of quarantine, Toronto, Canada. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2004; 10(7): 1206–1212.
14. Reynolds DL, Garay JR, Deamond SL, Moran MK, Gold W, Styra R. Understanding, compliance and psychological impact of the SARS quarantine experience. Epidemiol Infect. 2008; 136: 997–1007.
15. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U,Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P. International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-Country Reliability and Validity. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 2003; 35(8): 1381-1395.

16. Karaca A, Turnagöl HH. Reliability and validity of three different questionnaires in employees. Hacettepe Journal of Sport Sciences 2007; 18(2): 68-84.

17. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36 item short form healty survey (SF-36). I conceptual framework & item selection. Medical Care 1992; 30(6): 473–483.

18. Koçyiğit H, Aydemir Ö, Fişek G, Ölmez N, Memiş A. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of short form-36 (SF-36). Journal of Medicine and Treatment 1999; 12(2): 102-106.
19. Ammar A, Mueller P, Trabelsi K, Chtourou H, Boukhris O, Masmoudi L, Bouaziz B, Brach M, Schmicker M, Bentlage E, How D, Ahmed M, et al. Emotional consequences of COVID-19 home confinement: The ECLB-COVID19 multicenter study. MedRxiv 2020.
20. Vural Ö, Eler S, Güzel NA. The relation of physical activity level and life quality at sedentary profession. SPORTMETRE Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences 2010; 8(2): 69-75.
21. Molanorouzi K, Khoo S, Morris T. Motives for adult participation in physical activity: Type of activity, age, and gender. BMC Public Health 2015; 15: 1-12.
22. Badicu G. Physical activity and sleep quality in students of the faculty of physical education and sport of Braşov, Romania. Sustainability. 2018; 10(7): 1-10.
23. Savcı S, Öztürk M, Arıkan H, İnce DE, Tokgözoğlu L. Physical activity levels of university students. Arch Turk Soc Cardiol 2006; 34(3): 166-172.
24. King AC, Blair SN, Bild DE, Dishman RK, Dubbert PM, Marcus BH, Oldridge NB, Paffenbarger RS, Powell KE, Yeager KK. Determinants of physical activity and interventions in adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 1992; 24(6): 221-236.
25. Akyüz H. The investigation of the relationship between leisure time consumers' levels of life quality and happiness: Olympic winter festival example. Ankara, Gazi University, Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Physical Education and Sports, 2018; 126.
26. Ölçücü B, Vatansever Ş, Özcan G, Çelik A. The relationship between physical activity level and life quaity among middle aged individuals. International Journal of Educational Sciences 2015; 2: 63-73.
27. Ergen A, Tanrıverdi O, Kumbasar A, Arslan E, Atmaca D. A cross- sectional study on the quality of life of healthcare professionals. Haseki Medical Bulletin, 2011; 49(1): 14-19.
28. Öztop H, Şener A, Güven S, Doğan N. Influences of Intergenerational Support on Life Satisfaction of the Elderly: The Turkish Sample. Social Behavior and Personality 2009; 37(7): 957-970.
29. Memik NÇ, Ağaoğlu B, Coşkun A, Üneri ÖŞ, Karakaya I. The validity and reliability of the Turkish pediatric quality of life Inventory for children 13-18 years old. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry 2007; 18(4): 353-363.
30. Aydıner Boylu A, Paçacıoğlu B. Quality of life and indicators. Journal of Academic Researches and Studies 2016; 8(15): 137-150.
31. Bıçkı A, Ak D. Housing Quality as an Urban Quality of Life Indicator: An Evaluation for Turkey. İdealKent Dergisi 2019; 730-746.
32. Tuna B. Aging Elegant Buildings of Söke. Journal of Architecture 2014; 379.
33. Yaşar MR. Housing the Poor: Rethinking Urban Poverty in Housing Poverty (Ed. Ö. Aytaç & S. İlhan), Ankara: Birleşik Bookstore 2013; 277-338.
34. Elbi N. The Investigation Of Reasons For Losing Historical Envoriment Of Original Fabric In Konya Sample. Selcuk University, Institute of Science and Technology, Konya, Master's Thesis, 2009.
35. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet 2020; 395: 912–920.
36. Purssell E, Gould D, Chudleigh J. Impact of isolation on hospitalised patients who are infectious: systematic review with meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2020; 10(2): 1-8.
37. Qiu J, Shen B, Zhao M, Wang Z, Xie B, Xu Y. A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: implications and policy recommendations. General Psychiatry 2020; 33: 1-2.
38. Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, Ho CS, Ho RC. Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020; 17(5): 1-25.
39. Altuğ F, Yağcı N, Kitiş, A, Büker N, Cavlak U. Analyzing of factors affecting the quality of life in elderly at home. Journal of Research on Elderly Problems 2009; 2(1): 48-60.
40. Tunç AÇ, Zorba E, Çingöz YE. The Effect of Exercise on Quality of Life in the Period of Pandemic (COVID 19). International Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies 2020; 6(1): 127-135.