The relationships of elite sailors’ functional movement screen scores and some of their motoric features with lower extremity pain

Main Article Content

Utku Gönener
Kürsad Sertbaş
Ahmet Gönener


Functional movement screen, Pain, Injury, Sailing


Study Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the relationships of elite sailors’ functional movement screening scores (FMS) and some of their motoric features with lower extremity pains. Method: The study included n=23 participants aged between 15-17 years. Functional movement screening, handgrip strength test, vertical jump test, sit-and-reach flexibility test, 1 RM bench press test, 1 RM squat test, and back strength dynamometer test were applied 3 times in pre-season, mid-season, and post-season. In addition to these tests, pains and injuries experienced sufficiently enough to prevent the athletes from training any day during the season were recorded every week from the beginning to the end of the season in accordance with the statements of the athletes. Results: A statistically significant and negative correlation was found between the number and severity of pains experienced in the 17th and 18th regions and the pre-test, mid-test, and post-test FMS scores (p<0.01). However, the number and severity of pains experienced in the 41st region were found to have no statistically significant relationships with pre-test, mid-test, and post-test FMS scores and motoric features (p>0.05). Likelihood ratios and R2 indices revealed that the 17th region was closer to the significance limit, but the FMS scores had no effect on the number and severity of pains. Conclusion: When FMS scores and regional pain were examined separately, statistically significant and negative relationships were found between the FMS scores and the number and severity of pains in the 17th and 18th regions. The results of the regression analysis showed that the effects of the FMS scores and some motoric features on lower extremity pain were not statistically significant (p>0.05).


Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 8 | PDF Downloads 14


1. Mackie H, Legg S. Preliminary assessment of force demands in laser racing. J Sci Med Sport. 1999;2(1):78-85. doi:10.1016/s1440-2440(99)80186-8
2. Shephard R. Biology and medicine of sailing. Sports Medicine. 1997;23(6):350-356. doi:10.2165/00007256-199723060-00002
3. Bøymo-Having L, Grävare M, Grävare Silbernagel K. A prospective study on dinghy sailors’ training habits and injury incidence with a comparison between elite sailor and club sailor during a 12-month period. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(13):826-831. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2012-091841
4. Neville V, Folland J. The epidemiology and aetiology of ınjuries in sailing. Sports Medicine. 2009;39(2):129-145. doi:10.2165/00007256-200939020-00003
5. Allen J. Sailing and sports medicine: a literature review. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40(7):587-593. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2002.001669
6. Açıkada C. Çocuk ve antrenman. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2004;38(1):16-26.
7. Carvalho A, Brown S, Abade E. Evaluating injury risk in first and second league professional Portuguese soccer: muscular strength and asymmetry. J Hum Kinet. 2016;51(1):19-26. doi:10.1515/hukin-2015-0166
8. Croisier J, Ganteaume S, Binet J, et al. Strength imbalances and prevention of hamstring injury in professional soccer players: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(8):1469-1475. doi:10.1177/0363546508316764
9. Bradley P, Portas M. The relationship between pre-season range of motion and muscle strain ınjury in elite soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(4):1155. doi:10.1519/r-20416.1
10. Leetun D, Ireland M, Willson J, et al. Core stability measures as risk factors for lower extremity ınjury in athletes. Med Sci Sport Exer. 2004;36(6):926-934. doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000128145.75199.c3
11. Dorrel B, Long T, Shaffer S, et al. The Functional Movement Screen as a Predictor of Injury in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II Athletes. J Athl Train. 2018;53(1):29-34. doi:10.4085/1062-6050-528-15
12. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function-part 1. N Am J Sports Phys. 2006;1(2):62-72.
13. Freyd M. The Graphic Rating Scale. J Educ Psychol. 1923;14(2):83-102. doi:10.1037/h0074329
14. Bijur P, Silver W, Gallagher E. Reliability of the Visual Analog Scale for Measurement of Acute Pain. Acad Emerg Med . 2001;8(12):1153-1157. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01132.x
15. Okada T, Huxel K, Nesser T. Relationship Between Core Stability, Functional Movement, and Performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(1):252-261. doi:10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181b22b3e
16. Bompa T, Haff GG. Dönemleme, Antrenman Kuramı Ve Yöntemi. 5th ed. Ankara: Spor Yayınevi ve Kitabevi; 2017.
17. Kiesel K, Plisky P, Voight M. Can serious injury in professional football be predicted by a pre-season functional movement screen?. N Am J Sports Phys. 2007;2(3):147-158.
18. Moran R, Schneiders A, Mason J, et al. Do Functional Movement Screen (FMS) composite scores predict subsequent injury? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(23):1661-1669. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096938
19. Smith P, Hanlon M. Assessing the Effectiveness of the Functional Movement Screen in Predicting Noncontact Injury Rates in Soccer Players. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(12):3327-3332. doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000001757
20. Attwood M, Roberts S, Trewartha G, England M, Stokes K. Association of the Functional Movement Screen™ with match-injury burden in men’s community rugby union. J Sports Sci. 2019;37(12):1365-1374. doi:10.1080/02640414.2018.1559525
21. Garrison M, Westrick R, Johnson MR, et al. Association between the functional movement screen and injury development in college athletes. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10(1):21.
22. Tee J, Klingbiel J, Collins R, et al. Preseason Functional Movement Screen Component Tests Predict Severe Contact Injuries in Professional Rugby Union Players. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(11):3194-3203. doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000001422
23. Clay H, Mansell J, Tierney R. Association between rowing injuries and the Functional Movement Screen™ in female collegiate Division I rowers. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016;11(3):345.
24. Chalmers S, Fuller J, Debenedictis T et al. Asymmetry during pre-season Functional Movement Screen testing is associated with injury during a junior Australian football season. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20(7):653-657. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2016.12.076
25. Azzam M, Throckmorton T, Smith R, et al. The Functional Movement Screen as a predictor of injury in professional basketball players. Curr Orthop Pract. 2015;26(6):619-623. doi:10.1097/bco.0000000000000296
26. Tan B, Leong D, Vaz Pardal C, Lin C, Kam J. Injury and illness surveillance at the International Sailing Federation Sailing World Championships 2014. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(11):673-681. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2015-095748
27. Bojsen-Møller J, Larsson B, Magnusson S, Aagaard P. Yacht type and crew-specific differences in anthropometric, aerobic capacity, and muscle strength parameters among international Olympic class sailors. J Sports Sci. 2007;25(10):1117-1128. doi:10.1080/02640410701287115
28. Işık Ö, Doğan İ. Body components changes and depression scores before competitions among elite female wrestlers. Acta Kinesiol. (2017); 11(1): 23-27.