Criteri per la diagnosi e l’attribuzione di una malattia muscoloscheletrica occupazionale

Contenuto principale dell'articolo

Francesco Saverio Violante

Keywords

Criteri; malattie professionali; apparato muscoloscheletrico

Abstract

Introduzione: I criteri per la diagnosi delle malattie muscoloscheletriche occupazionali variano ampiamente da paese a paese come dimostrato dalle grandi differenze tra paesi con sistemi economici e sociali comparabili (ad esempio, all’interno dell’Unione Europea). Molti paesi hanno un elenco di malattie professionali riconosciute e talvolta questi elenchi includono criteri diagnostici e di attribuzione, ma questi criteri non sono in genere molto specifici e possono essere anche molto diversi. Obiettivi: Lo scopo di questo lavoro è definire esplicitamente quali siano le informazioni necessarie per la diagnosi e l’attribuzione di una malattia muscoloscheletrica occupazionale basata sull’evidenza scientifica.
Metodi: Nell’ambito del quadro generale della medicina basata sull’evidenza scientifica, viene presentata una revisione delle informazioni richieste per definire: - quando è presente una malattia muscoloscheletrica, secondo le migliori tecniche disponibili; - come definire un’esposizione rilevante a fattori di rischio biomeccanici, secondo le migliori tecniche disponibili. Risultati: vengono presentati criteri per combinare le informazioni relative alla diagnosi di una malattia muscolo-scheletrica e all’esposizione a fattori di rischio biomeccanici per un’attribuzione della malattia all’esposizione professionale. I criteri utilizzano un modello probabilistico che combina dati epidemiologici e medici, la valutazione dell’esposizione occupazionale e dei fattori di rischio non professionali. Discussione: L’uso dei criteri proposti può migliorare il processo di diagnosi e attribuzione di una malattia muscoloscheletrica professionale. Inoltre, consente di associare un grado di probabilità a tale attribuzione e, in definitiva, può migliorare la qualità del processo decisionale del medico del lavoro.

Abstract 654 | PDF (Inglese) Downloads 458

Riferimenti bibliografici

1. GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018; 392:1789-1858

2. GBD 2017 Risk Factor Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018; 392:1923-1994

3. AMA Style Insider. Condition, Disease, Disorder. Accessible at: https://amastyleinsider.com/2011/11/21/condition-disease-disorder/

4. Expert committee on Identification and control of work-related diseases. Identification and control of work-related diseases: report of a WHO expert committee. WHO Technical Report Series 714, 1985. Accessible at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/40176/WHO_TRS_714.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

5. Fan X, Straube S: Reporting on work-related low back pain: data sources, discrepancies and the art of discovering truths.
Pain Manag 2016; 6:553-559

6. Hagberg M, Violante FS, Bonfiglioli R, et al: Prevention of musculoskeletal disorders in workers: classification and health surveillance - statements of the Scientific Committee on Musculoskeletal Disorders of the International Commission on Occupational Health. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012;13:109

7. Rempel D, Evanoff B, Amadio PC, et al: Consensus criteria for the classification of carpal tunnel syndrome in epidemiologic studies. Am J Public Health 1998; 88:1447-1451

8. Verbeek J: When work is related to disease, what established evidence for a causal relation?
Saf Health Work 2012; 3:110-6. 2

9. Boschman JS, Brand T, Frings-Dresen MH, van der Molen HF: Improving the assessment of occupational diseases by occupational physicians.Occup Med (Lond) 2017; 67 :13-19

10. Greaves WW, Das R, McKenzie JG, et al: Work-Relatedness. J Occup Environ Med 2018; 60: e640-e646

11. Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ, Moberg J, et al (GRADE Working Group): GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction. BMJ 2016 Jun 28;353:i2016

12. Strömberg T, Dahlin LB, Brun A, Lundborg G: Structural nerve changes at wrist level in workers exposed to vibration. Occup Environ Med. 1997; 54:307-311

13. Palmer K, Walker-Bone K, Linaker C, et al: The Southampton examination schedule for the diagnosis of musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. Ann Rheum Di. 2000; 59:5-11

14. Hegmann KT, Thiese MS, Wood EM, et al: Impacts of differences in epidemiological case definitions on prevalence for upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Hum Factors 2014; 56:191-202

15. Walker HK, Hall WD, Hurst JW (editors): Clinical Methods: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations. 3rd edition. Boston: Butterworths; 1990. Accesible at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK201/

16. Hermans J, Luime JJ, Meuffels DE, et al: Does this patient with shoulder pain have rotator cuff disease? The Rational Clinical Examination systematic review. JAMA 2013; 310:837-347

17. Verbeek J, Mischke C, Robinson R, et al: Occupational exposure to knee loading and the risk of osteoarthritis of the knee: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Saf Health Work 2017; 8:130-142

18. Alonso-Coello P, Oxman AD, Moberg J, et al (GRADE Working Group): GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines. BMJ. 2016 30;353:i2089

19. Van der Molen HF, Foresti C, Daams JG, et al: Work-related factors for specific shoulder disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med 2017; 74:745-755

20. Kuijer PPFM, Verbeek JH, Seidler A, et al: Work-relatedness of lumbosacral radiculopathy syndrome: Review and dose-response meta-analysis. Neurology 2018; 91:558-564

21. Verbeek J, Burdorf A: National variations in back pain: ecological fallacy or cultural differences? Scand J Work Environ Health. 2014; 40:1-3

22. Althubaiti A: Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods.
J Multidiscip Healthc 2016; 9:211-217

23. Sackett DL: The rational clinical examination. A primer on the precision and accuracy of the clinical examination. JAMA 1992; 267:2638-2644

24. Wright C, Smith B, Wright S, et al: Who develops carpal tunnel syndrome during pregnancy: An analysis of obesity, gestational weight gain, and parity. Obstet Med 2014; 7:90-94