Comparing Exposure to Psychosocial Risks: Face-to-Face Work vs. Telework

Main Article Content

Angela Gomez-Dominguez https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7387-2326
Pedro Ferrer-Rosende https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3791-4696
Laura Esteve-Matali https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6561-0131
Clara Llorens-Serrano https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9957-3156
Sergio Salas-Nicás https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8671-9662
Albert Navarro-Giné https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7153-4673

Keywords

Psychosocial risks, non-manual workers, telework, face-to-face work, gender, Spain

Abstract


Background: In recent years, substantial changes have occurred in the work organization and arrangements. One of the main ones has been the popularization of teleworking among non-manual workers. This paper aims to assess the exposure of psychosocial risks among non-manual Spanish wage-earners, depending on the working modality (mainly telework, combining teleworking with onsite work, or onsite work). Methods: Based on an online survey conducted between April and May 2021, a cross-sectional study was carried out among n=11,519 members of a trade union where Psychosocial Risks (PSR) were measured through COPSOQ Questionnaire Scales. All analyses were performed stratifying by sex. Results: Women who combine telework and face-to-face work (aPR: 1.21; 95%CI 1.07-1.37) and men who mainly telework (aPR: 1.26; 95%CI 1.11-1.43) and that combine (aPR: 1.27; 95%CI 1.11-1.45) are more exposed to quantitative demands than men and women who do not telework. On the other hand, women who telework, either entirely (aPR: 0.89; 95%CI 0.82-0.97) or combining (aPR: 0.89; 95%CI 0.81-0.98), are less exposed to emotional demands than women who do not telework, and the same occurs among men who mainly telework (aPR: 0.84; 95%CI 0.76-0.92). Telework and horizontal or vertical social support are not associated, except for supervisor support among males, nor with work-life conflict. Conclusions: Except for quantitative demands, employees who combine telework and face-to-face work are less exposed to psychosocial risks than those who mainly telework or work face-to-face only. More studies with a gender and class perspective are needed in this area.


Abstract 155 | Supplementary file Downloads 141 PDF Downloads 174

References

1. Koetsier J. 58% of American knowledge workers are now working remotely. Forbes. Published online 2020.
2. Eurofound. Fifth Round of the Living, Working and COVID-19 e-Survey: Living in a New Era of Uncertainty. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions: Dublin.; 2022.
3. Paškvan M, & KB. The intensification of work. In: Job Demands in a Changing World of Work. 1st ed. ; 2017:25-44.
4. Ďuranová L, Ohly S. Persistent work-related technology use, recovery and well-being processes: Focus on supplemental work after hours. Springer. Published online 2016.
5. Ronald E. Rice. Flexwork, Work–Family Boundaries, and Information and Communication Technologies. (Guido Hertel DLSRDJJP, ed.).; 2017.
6. Ruhle SA, Breitsohl H, Aboagye E, et al. “To work, or not to work, that is the question” – Recent trends and avenues for research on presenteeism. EJWOP. 2020;29(3):344-363. Doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2019.1704734
7. Kelliher C, Anderson D. Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Hum Relat. 2010;63:83-106.
8. Gajendran RS, & Harrison DA. The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92:1524-1541.
9. Holland P, Collins AM. "Whenever I can I push myself to go to work": a qualitative study of experiences of sickness presenteeism among workers with rheumatoid arthritis. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(4):404-413. Doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1258436
10. Rousculp MD, Johnston SS, Palmer LA, Chu B-C, Mahadevia PJ, Nichol KL. Attending work while sick: Implication of flexible sick leave policies. J Occup Environ Med. 2010;52:1009-1013.
11. Irvine A. Fit for work?: The influence of sick pay and job flexibility on sickness absence and implications for presenteeism. Soc Policy Adm. 2011;45:752-769.
12. Kreiner K, Hollensbe EC, Sheep ML. Balancing borders and bridges: negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. AMJ. 2009;52:704-730.
13. Moreno-Colom S. The gendered division of housework time: Analysis of time use by type and daily frequency of household tasks. Time Soc. 2017;26(1):3-27. Doi: 10.1177/0961463X15577269
14. Greenhaus JH, Allen TD. Work–Family Balance: A Review and Extension of the Literature. 2nd ed.; 2011.
15. Eurofound ILO. Working anytime, anywhere: The effects on the world of work. Publications Office; International Labour Office. Published online 2017.
16. Amlinger-Chatterjee M. Psychische Gesundheit in der Arbeitswelt: Forschung Projekt F 2353: Atypische Arbeitszeiten.
17. Korunka C, & KB. Job Demands in a Changing World of Work. 1st ed. Springer International Publishing. ; 2017.
18. Kinnunen U, Feldt T, de Bloom J, Sianoja M, Korpela K, Geurtus S. Linking boundary crossing from work to non-work to work-related rumination across time: a variable- and person-oriented approach. J Occup Health Psychol. 2017;22:467-480.
19. Mache S, Servaty R, Harth V. Flexible work arrangements in open workspaces and relations to occupational stress, need for recovery and psychological detachment from work. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2020;15(5).
20. Mann S, Holdsworth L. The psychological impact of teleworking: Stress, emotions, and health. New Technol Work Employ. 2003;18:196-211.
21. Steward B. Health trade-offs in teleworking: An exploratory study of work and health in computer home-based working. Indexer. 2001;22:2461-2491.
22. Demerouti E, Daantje D, ten Brummelhuis LL, Bakker AB. New ways of working: Impact on working conditions, work–family balance, and well-being. In: Korunka C. HP, ed. The Impact of ICT on Quality of Working Life, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Springer. 2014:123-141.
23. Moncada Lluís S, Llorens Serrano C, Salas Nicás S, Moriña Soler D, Navarro Giné A. La tercera versión de COPSOQ-ISTAS21. Un instrumento internacional actualizado para la prevención de riesgos psicosociales en el trabajo. Rev Esp Salud Pública. 2021;95:e1-16.
24. Farré L, Yawaz Y, González L, Graves J. How the COVID-19 Lockdown Affected Gender Inequality in Paid and Unpaid Work in Spain. IZA Discussion Paper 13434. Published online 2020.
25. EU OSHA. Telework and Health Risks in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from the Field and Policy Implications.; 2021.
26. Antunes ED, Bridi LRT, Santos M, Fischer FM. Part-time or full-time teleworking? A systematic review of the psychosocial risk factors of telework from home. Front Psychol. 2023;14. Doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1065593
27. Syvänen S LK. Remote and Technology-Based Dialogic Development during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Positive and Negative Experiences. Challenges, and Learnings Challenges. 2022;13:2.
28. Rodríguez-Modroño P, López-Igual P. Job Quality and Work—Life Balance of Teleworkers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(6). Doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063239
29. Tavares A.I. Telework and health effects review. Int J Health . 2017;3(30).
30. Kossek EE, Lautsch BA, Eaton SC. Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work–family effectiveness. J Vocat Behav. 2006;68(2):347-367.
31. Hill EJ, Hawkins AJ, Miller BC. Work and family in the virtual office: Perceived Influences of Mobile Network. Fam Relat. 1996;45(3):293-301.
32. Duxbury L, Halinski M. When more is less: an examination of the relationship between hours in telework and role overload. Work. 2014;48:91-103.
33. Barros AM, and da SJRG. Percepções dos indivíduos sobre as consequências do teletrabalho na configuração home-office : estudo de caso na Shell Brasil. Cad EbapeBr . 2010;8:72-91.
34. Kaduk A, Genadek K, Kelly EL, Moen P. Involuntary vs. voluntary flexible work: insights for scholars and stakeholders. CommunityWork Family. 2019;22:412-442.
35. Giunchi M, Pena-Jimenez M, Petrilli S. Work-Family Boundaries in the Digital Age: A Study in France on Technological Intrusion, Work-Family Conflict, and Stress. Med Lav. 2023;114(4).
36. Chung H; Seo H; Birkett H; Forbes S. Working from home and the division of childcare and house-work among dual-earner parents during the pandemic in the UK. Merits. 2022;2:270-292.
37. Escudero-Castillo I, Mato-Díaz FcoJ, Rodriguez-Alvarez A. Furloughs, Teleworking and Other Work Situations during the COVID-19 Lockdown: Impact on Mental Well-Being. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(6). Doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062898
38. Ghislieri C, Molino M, Dolce V. To Work or Not to Work Remotely? Work-To-Family Interface Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Med Lav. 2023;114(4).
39. Parkinson B. Emotions Are Social. Br J Psychol. 1996;87(4):663-683.
40. Hobbs D, Armstrong J. An Experimental Study of Social and Psychological Aspects of Teleworking. Facilities. 1998;98:214-218.