Evaluation of the relationship between sick building syndrome complaints among hospital employees and indoor environmental quality

Main Article Content

Halil Erkan Sayan
Seyhan Dülger

Keywords

Sick building syndrome, Hospital employees, Indoor environmental quality, Hospital environment, complaints

Abstract

Background: Sick building syndrome (SBS) is defined as a condition occurring in people who live or work in a modern building and who suffer from complaints such as headache, fatigue, lack of concentration, and irritation of the skin and mucous membranes. Objectives: The aim of this study is to examine the complaints associated with SBS in the employees of our hospital and evaluate the relationship between the characteristics of the work environment and the complaints of SBS. Methods: 890 workers participated in the study. The complaints of the participants were rated and the sum of all complaints was recorded as the Total Complaint Score (TCS). The mean TCS of the participants was compared according to demographic characteristics and work environment characteristics. Results: The most common complaints among the employees were fatigue (40%), and general muscle and joint pain (31.4%). There was a statistically significant difference in TCS according to the position (p < 0.001). The mean TCS was significantly higher in females [13 (0–81)] than in males [6 (0–59)] (p < 0.001). The mean TCS increased with the presence of odor, new wall paint, the presence of fungus/ mold on walls, and the presence of rotting/mold smell (p < 0.001, for all). TCS positively correlated with stress level, social relationship, noise level, comfort, cleanliness, number of employees in the same room, presence of odor, new wall paint, presence of rotting/mold, and use of chemical materials for cleaning in the room (p < 0.001, for all), and negatively correlated with room size and number of windows (p = 0.006, p < 0.001, respectively). Discussion: The present study found that the female gender, a high level of education, a high level of stress, a low level of social relationships and work environment characteristics were associated with the complaints of SBS among the employees. Accordingly, we believe that hospital management should be informed in order for the managers to take precautions and make new regulations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 49 | PDF Downloads 42

References

1- Arikan I, Tekin OF, Erbas O. Relatıonshıp between sıck buıldıng syndrome and ındoor aır qualıty among hospıtal staff. Med Lav 2018 20;109(6):435-443. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v110i6.7628
2- United States Environmental Protection Agency. Indoor Air Facts No. 4 (revised). Sick Building Syndrome. Research and Development (MD-56), 1991 Feb. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-08/documents/sick_building_factsheet.pdf
3- World Health Organisation (WHO). Indoor air pollutants: exposure and health effects. EURO Reports and Studies, No. 78. Copenhagen: WHO, 1983. https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/156970/euro_series_78.pdf
4- Burge PS, Hedge A, Wilson S, Bass JH, Robertson A. Sick building syndrome; a study of 4373 office workers. Ann Occup Hyg 1987;31:493–504. doi:10.1093/annhyg/31.4a.493.
5- Smajlovi´c SK, Kukec A, Dovjak M. Association between Sick Building Syndrome and Indoor Environmental Quality in Slovenian Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16:3224 doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173224
6- Abdel-Hamid MA, S AH, Elokda EE, Mostafa NS. Prevalence and risk factors of sick building syndrome among office workers. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2013 Aug;88(2):109-14. doi: 10.1097/01.EPX.0000431629.28378.c0
7- Wittczak T, Walusiak J, Pałczyński C. "Sick building syndrome"--a new problem of occupa-tional medicine. Med Pr. 2001;52(5):369-73
8- Crawford JO, Bolas SM. Sick building syndrome, work factors and occupational stress. Scand J Work Environ Health 1996;22(4):243-250. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.138
9- Suzuki N, Nakaoka H, Hanazato M , Nakayama Y, Tsumura K, Takaya K, Todaka E, Mori C. Indoor Air Quality Analysis of Newly Built Houses. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019; 28;16(21):4142. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214142
10- Dovjak, M.; Kukec, A. Creating Healthy and Sustainable Buildings: An Assessment of Health Risk Factors. Springer, Switzerland, 2019. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-19412-3
11- Andersson K, Stridh G: The use of standardized questionnaires in building related illness (BRI) and sick building syndrome (SBS) surveys. In Levy F, Maroni,eds: NATO/CCMS pilot study on indoor air quality. National Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, 1992;47-64. Retrieved from http://www.mmquestionnaire.se/mmq/mm040_care.pdf
12- Mentese S, Tasdibi D. Airborne bacteria levels in indoor urban environments: The influence of season and prevalence of sick building syndrome (SBS). Indoor and Built Environment 2016;25(3):563-580. doi:10.1177/1420326X14562454
13- Nakayama Y, Nakaoka H, Suzuki N, Tsumura K, Hanazato M, Todaka E, Mori C. Prevalence and risk factors of pre-sick building syndrome: characteristics of indoor environmental and indi-vidual factors. Environ Health Prev Med 2019;24(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12199-019-0830-8
14- de Zwart BC, Broersen JP, Frings-Dresen MH, van Dijk FJ. Musculoskeletal complaints in the Netherlands in relation to age, gender and physically demanding work. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1997;70 (5):352-60. doi: 10.1007/s004200050229
15-Knez I, Enmarker I. Effects of office lighting on mood and cognitive performance and a gen-der effect in work-related judgment. Environ Behav 1998;30(4):553–567. doi:10.1177/001391659803000408
16- Karlqvist L, Tornqvist EW, Hagberg M, Hagman M, Toomingas A. Self-reported working conditions of VDU operators and associations with musculoskeletal symptoms: a cross-sectional study focusing on gender differences. Int J Ind Ergon 2002;30(4):277–294. doi:10.1016/S0169-8141(02)00131-2
17- Kim J, Jang M, Choi K, Kim K. Perception of indoor air quality (IAQ) by workers in under-ground shopping centers in relation to sick-building syndrome (SBS) and store type: a cross-sectional study in Korea. BMC Public Health 2019;19(1):632. doi:10.1186/s12889-019-6988-6
18- Runeson R, Wahlstedt K, Wieslander G, Norback D. Personal and psychosocial factors and symptoms compatible with sick building syndrome in the Swedish workforce. Indoor Air 2006;16(6):445–53. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2006.00438.x
19- Lin Z, Wang T, Norback D, Kan H, Sundell J, Zhao Z. Sick building syndrome, perceived odors, sensation of air dryness and indoor environment in Urumqi, China. Chin Sci Bull 2014;59(35):5153–60. doi:10.1007/s11434-014-0647-1
20- Quoc CH, Huong GV, Duc HN. Working Conditions and Sick Building Syndrome among Health Care Workers in Vietnam. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 21;17(10):3635. doi:10.3390/ijerph17103635
21- Karvala K, Sainio M, Palmquist E, Claeson AS, Nyback MH, Nordin S. Building-Related En-vironmental Intolerance and Associated Health in the General Population. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018;15(9):2047. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15092047
22- Johansson A, Brämerson A, Millqvist E, Nordin S, Bende M. Prevalence and risk factors for self-reported odour intolerance: the Skövde population-basedstudy. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2005;78(7):559–64. doi: 10.1007/s00420-005-0616-8
23- Lee S, Park MH, Jeong BY. Gender differences in public office workers' satisfaction, subjec-tive symptoms and musculoskeletal complaints in workplace and office environments. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2018;24(2):165-170. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2016.1272959
24- Redman T, Hamilton P, Malloch H, Kleymann B. Working here makes me sick! The conse-quences of sick building syndrome. Human Resource Manag J 2011;21:14–27. doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2010.00155.x
25- Runeson R, Wahlstedt K, Wieslander G, Norback D. Personal and psychosocial factors and symptoms compatible with sick building syndrome in the Swedish workforce. Indoor Air 2006;16(6):445-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2006.00438.x
26- Dhungana P, Chalise M. Prevalence of Sick Building Syndrome Symptoms and its Associated Factors among Bank Employees in Pokhara Metropolitan, Nepal. Indoor Air 2020;30(2):244-250. doi: 10.1111/ina.12635
27- Chang C.J, Yang H.H, Wang Y.F, Li M.S. Prevalence of Sick Building Syndrome-Related Symptoms among Hospital Workers in Confined and Open Working Spaces. Aerosol Air Qual Res 15: 2378-2384. doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2015.01.0040
28- Rashid M, Zimring CA. Review of the Empirical Literature on the Relationships between In-door Environmental and Stress in Healthcare and Office Settings: Problems and Prospects of Shar-ing Evidence. Environ Behav 2008;40(2):151-190. doi:10.1177/0013916507311550
29- Akova I, Kiliç E, Sümer H, Keklikçi T. Prevalence of sick building syndrome in hospital staff and its relationship with indoor environmental quality. Int J Environ Health Res 2020;16:1-16. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2020.1862067
30- Straus DC. Molds, mycotoxins, and sick building syndrome. Toxicol Ind Health 2009;25(9):617–35. doi: 10.1177/0748233709348287
31- Saijo Y, Kishi R, Sata F, et al. Symptoms in relation to chemicals and dampness in newly built dwellings. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2004;77(7):461–70. doi: 10.1007/s00420-004-0535-0
32- Fu X, Norbäck D, Yuan Q, et al. Association between indoor microbiome exposure and sick building syndrome (SBS) in junior high schools of Johor Bahru, Malaysia. Sci Total Environ 2021;20;753:141904. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141904