GPS guided reverse shoulder arthroplasty: : an anatomic dissection study

GPS guided reverse shoulder arthroplasty

: an anatomic dissection study

Authors

  • Giovanni Battista Colasanti a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:20:"Università di Siena";}
  • Fabio Moreschini Università di Siena
  • Carlo Cataldi Università di Siena
  • Nicola Mondanelli Università di Siena
  • Stefano Giannotti Università di Siena

Keywords:

GPS, Shoulder arthroplasty, Navigation

Abstract

Background and aim of the work: The reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has risen exponentially,
this has entailed an increasing number of complications and reoperations. In RSA, loads are transferred
directly to the glenoid component. As a result, failure of the glenoid component is one of the most common
complications. CT 3D preoperative planning, patient-specific and the possibility of performing a more
precise and controlled surgical gesture in the operating room are increasingly important. The use of the GPS
navigation on CT 3D planning has proved to be useful above all in terms of accuracy, reliability and the
possibility of reproducing the planned gesture preoperatively. Methods: This study analyzes the precision, safety, and reproducibility of the GPS system for the reverse shoulder prosthesis tested on 6 scapulohumeral cadaver specimens, subsequently subjected to anatomical dissection to verify the correct positioning of the glenoidcomponents and the percentage of appropriateness in the field of planning previously virtually assumed.
Results: Postoperative macroscopic dissection revealed no central peg perforated or screws malpositioned, no
leaking from the bone or injury to the adjacent neurovascular structures. The average length of the screws
was 42 mm (range 36 mm to 46 mm) for the lower screw and 40 mm for the upper one (range 36 mm to 42
mm). Conclusions: This cadaver study has shown that GPS navigation offers greater efficiency in baseplate and
screws placement and can avoid intra- and postoperative complications.

References

Westermann RW, Pugely AJ, Martin CT, Gao Y, Wolf BR, Hettrich CM. Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in the United States: A Comparison of National Volume, Patient Demographics, Complications, and Surgical Indications. Iowa Orthop J. 2015;35:1-7.

Kim SH, Wise BL, Zhang Y, Szabo RM. Increasing incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A. 2011;93(24):2249-2254. doi:10.2106/JBJS.J.01994

Zumstein MA, Pinedo M, Old J, Boileau P. Problems, complications, reoperations, and revisions in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2011;20(1):146-157. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.001

Boileau P. Complications and revision of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102(1):S33-S43. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2015.06.031

Nyffeler RW, Werner CML, Gerber C. Biomechanical relevance of glenoid component positioning in the reverse Delta III total shoulder prosthesis. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2005;14(5):524-528. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.010

Chebli C, Huber P, Watling J, Bertelsen A, Bicknell RT, Matsen F. Factors affecting fixation of the glenoid component of a reverse total shoulder prothesis. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2008;17(2):323-327. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2007.07.015

Giannotti S, Bottai V, Dell’Osso G, et al. Thirty-six consecutive reverse shoulder arthroplasties in cuff arthropathy: Our experience with the anterosuperior approach. Eur Orthop Traumatol. 2014;5(3):293-298. doi:10.1007/s12570-014-0248-0

Scalise JJ. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Minerva Ortop e Traumatol. 2009;60(1):55-59. doi:10.2106/00004623-200707000-00011

Codsi MJ, Iannotti JP. The effect of screw position on the initial fixation of a reverse total shoulder prosthesis in a glenoid with a cavitary bone defect. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2008;17(3):479-486. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2007.09.002

Hart ND, Clark JC, Wade Krause FR, Kissenberth MJ, Bragg WE, Hawkins RJ. Glenoid screw position in the Encore Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis: An anatomic dissection study of screw relationship to surrounding structures. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2013;22(6):814-820. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2012.08.013

Plancher KD. Sports Medicine : Shoulder. 2012:113-116.

Bigliani LU, Dalsey RM, McCann PD, April EW. An anatomical study of the suprascapular nerve. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 1990;6(4):301-305. doi:10.1016/0749-8063(90)90060-Q

Wang J, Singh A, Higgins L, Warner J. Suprascapular neuropathy secondary to reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A case report. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2010;19(3):e5. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.004

Cofield RH. Bone grafting for glenoid bone deficiencies in shoulder arthritis: A review. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2007;16(5 SUPPL.):273-281. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2007.03.005

Harman M, Frankle M, Vasey M, Banks S. Initial glenoid component fixation in “reverse” total shoulder arthroplasty: A biomechanical evaluation. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2005;14(1 SUPPL.):S162-S167. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.030

Lévigne C, Boileau P, Favard L, et al. Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2008;17(6):925-935. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2008.02.010

Downloads

Published

30-05-2020

How to Cite

1.
Colasanti GB, Moreschini F, Cataldi C, Mondanelli N, Giannotti S. GPS guided reverse shoulder arthroplasty: : an anatomic dissection study. Acta Biomed [Internet]. 2020 May 30 [cited 2024 Jul. 27];91(4-S):204-8. Available from: https://mattioli1885journals.com/index.php/actabiomedica/article/view/9377