Second-look TURBT: evaluation of anatomopatological and oncologic results in a single center

Second-look TURBT: evaluation of anatomopatological and oncologic results in a single center

Authors

  • Matteo Maltagliati
  • Virginia Varca
  • Riccardo Milandri Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia
  • Salvatore Micali
  • Tommaso Bocchialini
  • Bernardo Maria Cesare Rocco
  • Andrea Gregori

Keywords:

second-look TURBT, Re-TURBT, bladder cancer, NMIBC, cistectomy

Abstract

Introduction: T1 bladder cancer is associated with a high risk of recurrence and progression; concomitant carcinoma in situ and/or multifocality are negative prognostic factors. Persistent disease after resection of T1 tumours has been observed in 33-55% of patients, and after resection of High-grade (HG) Ta tumour in 41,4%. It has been demonstrated that a second TURB can increase recurrence-free survival and it can make a restaging of the cancer. Patients and methods: From January 2011 to December 2016, 87 patients with superficial bladder tumor (Ta-T1), undergoing TURB and routine repeat TURB (Re-TURB) 4-6 weeks after the initial resection, were included in the study. Re-TURB was applied to the scar of the first resection and other suspicious lesions in the bladder. After the second-look, we studied the follow-up of each patient. Results: Specimens obtained during the second TURBT showed no tumor in 47 (54,02%) patients; 40 (45,98%) patients had residual cancer: 34 of them had cancer of the same stage, 6 patients of pT1 had a lower stage, and 3 had a higher stage. 5 patient underwent radical cistectomy immediatly after re-TURBT. During the first year of follow up, 15 patients had a recurrent bladder cancer; 2 of them underwent radical cistectomy. Conclusions: T1 bladder cancer is an high risk tumor, so that second-look TURBT is a valuable procedure for accurate staging of nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer and it can guarantee a better eradication of the neoplasm.

References

Andius P, Johansson SL, Holmäng S. Prognostic factors in stage T1 bladder cancer: tumor pattern (solid or papillary) and vascular invasion more important than depth of invasion. Urology 2007 Oct;70(4):758-62.

Vasdev N, Dominguez-Escrig J, Paez E, et al. The impact of early re-resection in patients with pT1 high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Ecancermedicalscience. 2012.

Lazica DA, Roth S, Brandt AS, et al. Second transurethral resection after Ta high-grade bladder tumor: a 4.5-year period at a single university center. Urol Int 2014.

M. Babjuk (Chair), A. Böhle, M. Burger, et al. Guidelines on non-muscle-invasive bladder Cancer (Ta, T1 and CIS), European Association of Urology 2015.

Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta, T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol (2006 Mar).

Nieder AM, Brausi M, Lamm D, et al. Management of stage T1 tumors of the bladder: International Consensus Panel. Urology (2005).

Aydin M1, Tandogdu Z, Kurtulus FO, Avci E, Fazlioglu A, Cek M., A prospective evaluation of second transurethral resection in non-muscle invasive bladder tumors, J BUON. 2010 Jul-Sep;15(3):514-7.

Downloads

Published

11-05-2020

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

How to Cite

1.
Maltagliati M, Varca V, Milandri R, Micali S, Bocchialini T, Rocco BMC, et al. Second-look TURBT: evaluation of anatomopatological and oncologic results in a single center. Acta Biomed [Internet]. 2020 May 11 [cited 2024 Jul. 18];91(2):322-5. Available from: https://mattioli1885journals.com/index.php/actabiomedica/article/view/8618