Can the medullary diameter/cortical thickness ratio be a predictor of diaphyseal fracture in elderly patients treated with cephalo-medullary nail for proximal femur fractures? A retrospective cohort study on 488 patients
Keywords:
diaphyseal fracture , MD/CW, Cephalo-medullary nailsAbstract
Background and aim of the work: Diaphyseal femoral fracture occurring distal to the CM nail tip is an infrequent complication that presents some similarities with periprosthetic hip fractures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the correlation between medullary diameter (MD) and cortical width (CW) ratio, a known risk factor for periprosthetic fracture, with the occurrence of diaphyseal fracture distal to the nail tip.
Research Design and Methods: Study population included patients > 65 years old treated with short CM nail for proximal femur fractures (PFF) at the Cattinara Hospital-ASUGI of Trieste (Italy) Orthopedics and Traumatology Unit between July 2014 and May 2018. Latest follow-up X-rays were evaluated to identify diaphyseal fracture occurrence. We recorded type of trauma, time lapse between CM nailing and diaphyseal fracture and calculate the MD/CW ratio on intra-operative X-rays. Data were analyzed to find out a correlation with the occurrence of diaphyseal fractures.
Results: The study population counted 488 patients. Diaphyseal fracture occurred in 14 cases (2.9%, F:M ratio 6:1, mean age 87 years), at mean 26.07 months after CM nailing. The MD/CW ratio identified a trend of increased risk of diaphyseal fractures as the ratio increases (OR 4.51; CI 0.826-24.642) although the correlation does not reach statistical significance (p 0.082).
Conclusions: The results of the present study demonstrate a trend towards a higher risk of diaphyseal fracture as the MD/CW ratio increases, although the association did not reach statistical significance due to the small number of events.
References
Norris R, Bhattacharjee D, Parker MJ. Occurrence of secondary fracture around intramedullary nails used for trochanteric hip fractures: A systematic review of 13,568 patients. Injury. Published online 2012; 43(6), 706–711.
Loch DA, Kyle RF, Bechtold JE, Kane M, Anderson K, Sherman RE. Forces required to initiate sliding in second-generation intramedullary nails. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A. Published online 1998 Nov; 80(11):1626-31.
Helwig P, Faust G, Hindenlang U, et al. Finite element analysis of four different implants inserted in different positions to stabilize an idealized trochanteric femoral fracture. Injury. Published online 2009 Mar; 40(3):288-95.
Dunn J, Kusnezov N, Bader J, Waterman BR, Orr J, Belmont PJ. Long versus short cephalomedullary nail for trochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31-A1, A2 and A3): a systematic review. J Orthop Traumatol. Published online 2016 Dec; 17(4):361-367.
Lipof JS, Amitai AD, Judd KT, Gorczyca JT. Radiographic Risk Factors for Interprosthetic Femur Fractures. Iowa Orthop J. 2017; 37:35-39.
Videla-Cés, Miquel; Sales-Pérez, José-Miguel; Sánchez-Navés, Rubén; Romero-Pijoan, Eudald; Videla, Sebastián (2018). Proposal for the Classification of Peri-Implant Femoral Fractures: Retrospective cohort study. Injury, 2019 Mar; 50(3):758-763.
Shannon SF, Yuan BJ, Cross WW 3rd, Barlow JD, Torchia ME, Holte PK, Sems SA. Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nails for Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Randomized Prospective Study. J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Oct; 33(10):480-486.
Skála-Rosenbaum J, Džupa V, Bartoška R, Douša P, Waldauf P, Krbec M. Distal locking in short hip nails: Cause or prevention of peri-implant fractures? Injury. 2016 Apr; 47(4):887-92.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Gianluca Canton, Pamela Nassiz, Chiara Ratti, Alessandro De Luca, Luigi Murena
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.
How to Cite
