Nutritional Assessment in Patients with Double Malignant Obstruction: Biliary and Duodenal

Nutritional Assessment in Patients with Double Malignant Obstruction: Biliary and Duodenal

Authors

Keywords:

Duodenal strictures, Biliary strictures, Nutritional status, Undernutrition, Assessment

Abstract

Background and aim: Biliary tract and pancreatic cancers carry a poor prognosis due to their rapid progression and frequent complications, such as malignant biliary and duodenal stenosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the nutritional status of patients with simultaneous biliary and duodenal obstruction and its negative impact on their general condition and quality of life. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 200 patients hospitalized at Ibn Sina University Hospital in Rabat for malignant stenosis. Among them, 110 had isolated biliary stenosis (Group 1), while 90 presented with both biliary and duodenal stenosis (Group 2). Data collected included anthropometric measurements (weight, height, BMI), biological parameters (albumin, bilirubin, CRP), vomiting frequency, and Nutritional Risk Index (NRI). Results: The study population consisted of 54.5% men and 45.5% women, with a mean age of 56.7 years. Patients in Group 2 had significantly lower weight (47.4 ± 5.4 kg) and BMI (15.9 ± 2.0 kg/m²) compared with Group 1 (57.4 ± 9.3 kg and 20.0 ± 3.3 kg/m²; p = 0.000). Biologically, Group 2 showed more pronounced hypoalbuminemia (26.1 g/L vs 29.3 g/L) and higher bilirubin and CRP levels. Severe malnutrition was observed in 100% of Group 2 versus 76.3% of Group 1. Daily vomiting was also more frequent in Group 2 (84.4% vs 16.3%). Conclusions: These findings confirm the critical impact of double malignant obstruction on nutritional status and quality of life, underlining the importance of early nutritional assessment, timely intervention, and a multidisciplinary palliative approach to improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.

References

1. Abraham NS, Barkun JS, Barkun AN. Palliation of malignant biliary obstruction: a prospective trial examining impact on quality of life. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56(6):835-41. doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.129868.

2. Fábián A, Bor R, Gede N et al. Double Stenting for Malignant Biliary and Duodenal Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2020;11(4):e00161. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000161.

3. Zhao L, Xu H, Zhang Y. Palliation double stenting for malignant biliary and duodenal obstruction. Exp Ther Med. 2016;11(1):348-352. doi: 10.3892/etm.2015.2875.

4. Yu J, Hao J, Wu D, Lang H. Retrospective evaluation of endoscopic stenting of combined malignant common bile duct and gastric outlet-duodenum obstructions. Exp Ther Med. 2014;8(4):1173-1177. doi: 10.3892/etm.2014.1899.

5. Mutignani M, Tringali A, Shah SG, et al. Combined endoscopic stent insertion in malignant biliary and duodenal obstruction. Endoscopy. 2007;39(5):440-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966327.

6. Bozzetti F. Nutritional Support in Oncologic Patients: Where We Are and Where We Are Going. Clinical Nutrition. 2011;30:714-717. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2011.06.011

7. Cotogni P, Stragliotto S, Ossola M, Collo A, Riso S, On Behalf Of The Intersociety Italian Working Group For Nutritional Support In Cancer. The Role of Nutritional Support for Cancer Patients in Palliative Care. Nutrients. 2021;13(2):306. doi: 10.3390/nu13020306.

8. Yu M, Li X, Chen M, et al. Prognostic potential of nutritional risk screening and assessment tools in predicting survival of patients with pancreatic neoplasms: a systematic review. Nutr J. 23,17(2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-024-00920-w

9. Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Al-Hawary M, et al. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021;19(4):439-457. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0017.

10. Huang L, Wang F, Wang F, et al. Anatomical classification of advanced biliary tract cancer predicts programmed cell death protein 1 blockade efficacy. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1375769. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1375769.

11. Lin F, Xia W, Chen M, et al. A prognostic model based on nutritional risk index in operative breast cancer. Nutrients. 2022;14(18):3783.

12. Jiao Z, Liang C, Luo G, et al. Prognostic utility of nutritional risk index in patients with head and neck soft tissue sarcoma. Nutrients. 2023;15(3):641.

13. Zhang L, Chen S, Huang M, et al. Prognostic value of the nutritional risk index in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Ann Hematol. 2023;102(1):125–32.

14. Cui L, Yu H, Sun Q, Miao Y, Jiang K, Fang X. Effects of body mass index and serum albumin on overall survival in patients with cancer undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center retrospective cohort study. World J Surg Oncol. 2022;20(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02678-z.

15. Fu N, Jiang Y, Qin K, Chen H, Deng X, Shen B. Higher body mass index indicated better overall survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients: a real-world study of 2010 patients. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):1318. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-09056-0.

16. Jachnis A, Słodkowski MT. The Relationship between Nutritional Status and Body Composition with Clinical Parameters, Tumor Stage, CA19-9, CEA Levels in Patients with Pancreatic and Periampullary Tumors. Curr Oncol. 2021;28(6):4805-4820. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28060406.

17. Mutignani M, Tringali A, Shah SG, et al. Combined endoscopic stent insertion in malignant biliary and duodenal obstruction. Endoscopy. 2007;39(5):440-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966327.

18. Gupta D, Lis CG. Pretreatment serum albumin as a predictor of cancer survival: a systematic review of the epidemiological literature. Nutr J. 2010;9:69. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-9-69.

19. Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(5):489-95. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7.

20. Gray S, Axelsson B. The prevalence of deranged C-reactive protein and albumin in patients with incurable cancer approaching death. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0193693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193693.

21. Muscaritoli M, Arends J, Bachmann P, et al. ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition in cancer. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(5):2898–2913.

22. Bozzetti F, Arends J, Lundholm K, et al. ESPEN guidelines on parenteral nutrition: non-surgical oncology. Clin Nutr. 2009;28(4):445–54

23. Mutignani M, Tringali A, Shah SG, et al. Combined endoscopic stent insertion in malignant biliary and duodenal obstruction. Endoscopy. 2007;39(5):440–447.

24. Tonozuka R, Itoi T, Baron TH, et al. Endoscopic double stenting for malignant biliary and duodenal obstruction due to pancreatic cancer. Dig Endosc. 2013;25(3):241–248.

25. Dominguez-Muñoz JE, Vujasinovic M, De La Iglesia D, et al. European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency: UEG, EPC, EDS, ESPEN, ESPGHAN, ESDO, and ESPCG evidence-based recommendations. United European Gastroenterol J. 2025;13(1):125-172. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12674.

26. Rasmussen HH, Irtun O, Olesen SS, Drewes AM, Holst M. Nutrition in chronic pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(42):7267-75. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i42.7267.

27. Peery AF, Crockett SD, Murphy CC, et al. Nutrition management in acute and chronic pancreatic disease: importance of enzyme replacement and micronutrient correction. World Gastroenterol Org Expert Views. 2022;162(2):621–644.

Downloads

Published

27-02-2026

Issue

Section

Original articles

How to Cite

1.
Acharki M, Boussenna I, Khyat C, Kabbaj N, Bour A. Nutritional Assessment in Patients with Double Malignant Obstruction: Biliary and Duodenal. Progr Nutr. 2026;28(1):17910 . doi:10.23751/pn.2026.17910