Enhancing Hearing Protection: Evaluating Innovative Training Modalities for Optimal Fitting Outcomes
Main Article Content
Keywords
Ear Protective Devices; Occupational Health; Noise-induced Hearing Loss; Hearing; educational intervention, Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Background: Measuring the effectiveness of training in properly fitting hearing protection devices (HPDs) is crucial, as it directly influences their attenuation. We assessed an earplug's personal attenuation ratings (PAR) following various intervention modalities. Methods: The sample consisted of 52 adults without experience using hearing protection devices (HPD). The Personal Attenuation Rating (PAR) was evaluated through real-ear attenuation at threshold (REAT) and microphone-in real-ear (MIRE) measurements after participants fitted the HPD as they saw fit. Participants were then randomly assigned to groups and given instructions on HPD fitting as follows: (G1) individual in-person demonstration; (G2) package reading; (G3) video; (G4) no intervention. PAR was subsequently reassessed. Data analysis was conducted using ANOVA and the Fisher Exact test. Results: Pre-intervention assessments showed no significant differences between the groups using either method. After training, G1, G2, and G3 significantly increased the PAR compared to G4, through both processes. The comparison of PAR post and pre-intervention revealed significant differences for G1, G2, and G3 (REAT) as well as for G1 and G3 (MIRE), in contrast to G4. Regarding “pass” and “fail” outcomes through MIRE, G1, G2, and G3 had more “pass” results after the intervention, compared to G4. Conclusions: Intervention, regardless of modality, effectively improved correct earplug HPD fitting, evidenced by increased PAR and higher rates of individuals achieving sufficient attenuation. Individual in-person demonstrations and video instructions proved to be the most effective training modalities.
References
2. Samara P, Athanasopoulos M, Markatos N, Athanasopoulos I. From sound waves to molecular and cellular mechanisms: Understanding noise induced hearing loss and pioneering preventive approaches (Review). Medicine International. 2024;60(4):1-12. Doi: 10.3892/mi.2024.184
3. Chen KH, Su S Bin, Chen KT. An overview of occupational noise-induced hearing loss among workers: epidemi-ology, pathogenesis, and preventive measures. Environ Health Prev Med. 2020;25(1). Doi: 10.1186/s12199-020-00906-0
4. Sliwinska-Kowalska M. New trends in the prevention of occupational noise-induced hearing loss. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2020;33(6). Doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01600
5. Usmani MK, Mumtaz N, Saqulain G. Hearing protective devices and its role in Noise induced hearing loss: An interventional study. J Pak Med Assoc. 2020;70(3). Doi: 10.5455/JPMA.4768
6. Etemadinezhad S, Amani AS, Moosazadeh M, et al. Occupational Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Iran: A System-atic Review and Meta-Analysis. Iran J Public Health. 2023;52(2). Doi: 10.18502/ijph.v52i2.11881
7. Moore BCJ, Lowe DA, Cox G. Guidelines for Diagnosing and Quantifying Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. Trends Hear. 2022;26. Doi: 10.1177/23312165221093156
8. Tikka C, Verbeek J, Kateman E, et al. Interventions to prevent occupational noise‐induced hearing loss. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;7(CD006396). Doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006396.pub4
9. Joseph A, Punch J, Stephenson M, et al. The effects of training format on earplug performance. Int J Audiol. 2007;46(10). Doi: 10.1080/14992020701438805
10. Takada MM, Rocha CH, Neves-Lobo IF, et al. Training in the proper use of earplugs: An objective evaluation. Work. 2020;65(2). Doi: 10.3233/WOR-203092
11. Fauzan NS, Sukadarin EH, Widia M, et al. A Systematic Literature Review of the Factors Influencing Hearing Protection Device Usage among Industrial Workers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(4). Doi: 10.3390/ijerph20042934
12. Berger EH, Voix J, Hager LD. Methods of Fit Testing Hearing Protectors, with Representative Field Test Data. In: 9th Congress of the International Commission Biological Effects of Noise, Mashantucket, CT, July 21 – 25, 2008; 2008.
13. Toivonen M, Pääkkönen R, Savolainen S, Lehtomäki K. Noise attenuation and proper insertion of earplugs into ear canals. Annals of Occupational Hygiene. 2002;46(6). Doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mef065
14. Neitzel R, Meischke H, Daniell WE, et al. Development and pilot test of hearing conservation training for con-struction workers. Am J Ind Med. 2008;51(2). Doi: 10.1002/ajim.20531
15. Assunção CHC, Trabanco JC, Gomes RF, Moreira RR, Samelli AG. Longitudinal evaluation of a hearing protector fit training program. Med Lav. 2019;110(4). Doi:10.23749/mdl.v110i4.8214
16. Cassano F, Aloise I, Labianca G, et al. The role of information and training for workers on the correct use of ear-plugs in assessing real noise attenuation with E-A-RfitTM system. Med Lav. 2015;106(4). Doi: 10.23749/mdl.v106i4.4250
17. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. NBR16077: Equipamento de Proteção Individual - Protetores Auditi-vos - Método de Cálculo Do Nível de Pressão Sonora Na Orelha Protegida; 2021.
18. 3M. 3MTM E-A-RfitTM Dual-Ear Validation System User Instructions. Personal Safety Division. October 2021. Accessed November 5, 2024. https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/1063740O/3mtm-e-a-rfittm-dual-ear-validation-system-user-manual-ver-a.pdf
19. Chiu CC, Wan TJ. Individual fit testing of hearing-protection devices based on microphones in real ears among workers in industries with high-noise-level manufacturing. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(9). Doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093242
20. Gong W, Zhang J, Liu X, et al. Verifying earplug attenuation and evaluating the effectiveness of one-on-one training along with earplug fit testing at nine facilities in China. Am J Ind Med. 2021;64(9). Doi: 10.1002/ajim.23270
21. Federman J, Karch SJ, Duhon C. How hearing conservation training format impacts personal attenuation rat-ings in U.S. Marine Corps Training Recruits. Int J Audiol. 2021;60(2). Doi: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1811407
22. Kim JW, Yang S, Chung I, Lee MY. The effect of earplug training on noise protection. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2019;31(1). Doi: 10.35371/AOEM.2019.31.E34
23. Gong W, Murphy WJ, Meinke DK, et al. Evaluating Earplug Performance over a 2-Hour Work Period with a Fit-Test System. Semin Hear. Published online 2023. Doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1769586
24. Rodrigues MAG, Dezan AA, Marchiori LL de M. Eficácia da escolha do protetor auditivo pequeno, médio e grande em programa de conservação auditiva. Revista CEFAC. 2006;8(4). Doi: 10.1590/s1516-18462006000400016
25. Samelli AG, Gomes RF, Chammas TV, et al. The study of attenuation levels and the comfort of earplugs. Noise Health. 2018;20(94). Doi: 10.4103/nah.NAH_50_17
26. Federman J, Duhon C. The viability of hearing protection device fit-testing at navy and marine corps accession points. Noise Health. 2016;18(85). Doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.195806
27. Razera APR, Trettene AS, Mondini CCSD, et al. Vídeo educativo: Estratégia de treinamento para cuidadores de crianças com fissura labiopalatina. ACTA Paulista de Enfermagem. 2016;29(4). Doi: 10.1590/1982-0194201600059
28. Morata TC, Gong W, Tikka C, et al. Hearing protection field attenuation estimation systems and associated training for reducing workers' exposure to noise. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024;17;5(5):CD015066. Doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015066.pub2
Article Sidebar
Article Details
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All Journal's articles are Open Access papers distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.
This work is licensed under a CC BY-NC 4.0 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
