COVID-19 Pandemic's Effects on Occupational Health and Perceived Work Ability of a Large Group of Italian Banking Employees

Main Article Content

Marco Mendola
Marco Leoni
Giuseppe Marano
Maurizio Coggiola
Dario Russignaga
Elia Biganzoli
Paolo Carrer

Keywords

asthenopia, Musculoskeletal disorders, work-related stress, work ability, tertiary

Abstract


Background: The COVID-19 pandemic compelled changes to the structure and organization of many occupational sectors that may impact workers' well-being and work-related symptoms. Objective: Evaluate the effects of working modifications related to the COVID-19 pandemic on occupational health outcomes and work ability (WA) among a large group of Italian banking employees. Methods: 2,859 employees visited during health surveillance in 2021 were divided into two job groups: front-office (FO) and back-office workers (BO). Data on conditions associated with office work, psychological distress, WA, and fitness-to-work judgment were analyzed and compared with available data from the pre-pandemic period (2018–2019). Results: The prevalence of analyzed outcomes was lower than in pre- and post-COVID evaluation literature. After COVID-19, a 28% increase in asthenopin was found in BO, while musculoskeletal symptoms increased about 22% in BO and 9% in FO. Post-COVID showed a 28% rise in stress-related symptoms and a 17% increase in psychotropic drug consumption in both groups. After the lockdown, the prevalence of moderate/poor scores decreased by 13% in each group. Fitness-to-work judgment without limitations prevalence was unchanged. Conclusion: The slight worsening in all examined outcomes at post-lockdown evaluation and the outcomes' prevalence consistently lower than the literature data could be linked to the measures the Institute took to support employees during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, a comprehensive integration between occupational safety and health promotion practices is recommended to ensure the highest level of safeguarding for workers' well-being.


Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

References

1. Italian Government, Decree of the Prime Minister 8th march 2020 “Ulteriori disposizioni attuative del decreto-legge 23 febbraio 2020, n. 6, recante misure urgenti in materia di contenimento e gestione dell'emergenza epidemiologica da COVID-19”. (available at: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2020/03/08/20A01522/sg; Last Accessed: 04.01.2024.)
2. Italian Government, Law Decree Apr 22 2021, n. 52 “Misure urgenti per la graduale ripresa delle attività economiche e sociali nel rispetto delle esigenze di contenimento della diffusione dell'epidemia da CO-VID-19. (available at: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2021/04/22/21G00064/sg; Last Ac-cessed: 04.01.2024.)
3. Meyer B, Zill A, Dilba D, Gerlach R, Schumann S. Employee psychological well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: A longitudinal study of demands, resources, and exhaustion. Int J Psychol. 2021;56(4):532-550. Doi: 10.1002/ijop.12743
4. Basso G, Formai S, “Il lavoro da remoto in Italia durante la pandemia: le imprese del settore privato,” Banca d’Italia, 2021. (available at: https://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/note-covid-19/2021/Nota_Covid_2_GBSF.pdf ; Last Ac-cessed: 04.01.2024.)
5. La Torre G, Chiappetta M, Mazzalai E, et al. Smart working perception in banking companies' employees during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional pilot study. Work. 2022;73(2):363-376. Doi: 10.3233/WOR-211152
6. SIML – Italian Society of Occupational Medicine “Linee guida per la sorveglianza sanitaria degli addetti ad attività lavorativa con videoterminali”, 2013. (available at: https://www.repertoriosalute.it/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Linee_Guida_VDT_SIMLII.1.pdf ; Last Accessed: 04.01.2024.)
7. SIML – Italian Society of Occupational Medicine, “Linee guida per la formazione continua e l’accreditamento del medico del lavoro: attività lavorativa con VDT". 2020. (available at: https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/5e314724ceeebbf011927853/5e314724ceeebb0d99927a2b_Funzione%20visiva%20ed%20uso%20occupazionale%20di%20videoterminali%20orientamenti%20ed%20indicazio-ni%20pratico-applicative%20per%20l’attività%20professionale%20del%20medico%20del%20lavoro%20e%20del%20medico%20competente%20-%20Documento%20di%20orientamento%20professionale.pdf ; Last Accessed: 04.01.2024.)
8. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Foresight on new and emerging occupational safety and health risks associated with digitalisation by 2025 – final report. 2018. (available at: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/dce30031-1946-11e9-8d04-01aa75ed71a1/language-en ; Last Accessed: 04.01.2024.)
9. Giorgi G, Arcangeli G, Perminiene M, et al. Work-Related Stress in the Banking Sector: A Review of Incidence, Correlated Factors, and Major Consequences. Front Psychol. 2017;8:2166. Published 2017 Dec 12. Doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02166
10. Mannocci A, Marchini L, Scognamiglio A, et al. Are Bank Employees Stressed? Job Perception and Positiv-ity in the Banking Sector: An Italian Observational Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(4):707. Published 2018 Apr 10. Doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040707
11. Gerding T, Davis KG, Wang J. An Investigation into Occupational Related Stress of At-Risk Workers Dur-ing COVID-19. Ann Work Expo Health. 2023;67(1):118-128. Doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxac076
12. Bethge M, Radoschewski FM, Müller-Fahrnow W. Work stress and work ability: cross-sectional find-ings from the German sociomedical panel of employees. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(20):1692-1699. Doi: 10.1080/09638280902751949
13. Garzaro G, Sottimano I, Di Maso M, et al. Work Ability among Italian Bank Video Display Terminal Oper-ators: Socio-Demographic, Lifestyle, and Occupational Correlates. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(9):1653. Published 2019 May 12. Doi: 10.3390/ijerph16091653
14. van den Berg TI, Elders LA, de Zwart BC, Burdorf A. The effects of work-related and individual factors on the Work Ability Index: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med. 2009;66(4):211-220. Doi :10.1136/oem.2008.039883
15. Checkoway H, Pearce N, & Kriebel D. Research methods in occupational epidemiology (Vol. 34). Mono-graphs in Epidemiology and Biostatistics. 2004.
16. Ilmarinen, Juhani. The work ability index (WAI). Occupational medicine. 57.2(2007):160-160.
17. Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH. (2012). Applied longitudinal analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
18. Zeger SL, Liang KY, Albert PS. (1988). Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation ap-proach. Biometrics, 1049-1060.
19. Friendly, M. (1999). Extending mosaic displays: Marginal, conditional, and partial views of categorical data. Journal of Computational and graphical Statistics, 8(3), 373-395.
20. R Core Team (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statisti-cal Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/
21. Højsgaard, S., Halekoh, U. & Yan J. (2006) The R Package geepack for Generalized Estimating Equations, Journal of Statistical Software, 15, 2, pp1—11
22. Taino G, Ferrari M, Mestad IJ, Fabris F, Imbriani M. Astenopia e lavoro al videoterminale: studio di una popolazione di 191 lavoratori esposti al rischio mediante somministrazione di questionario anamnestico mirato e valutazione oftalmologica [Asthenopia and work at video display terminals: study of 191 workers exposed to the risk by administration of a standardized questionnaire and ophthalmologic evaluation]. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2006;28(4):487-497.
23. Das A, Shah S, Adhikari TB, et al. Computer vision syndrome, musculoskeletal, and stress-related problems among visual display terminal users in Nepal. PLoS One. 2022;17(7):e0268356. Published 2022 Jul 19. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268356
24. Putsa B, Jalayondeja W, Mekhora K, Bhuanantanondh P, Jalayondeja C. Factors associated with reduced risk of musculoskeletal disorders among office workers: a cross-sectional study 2017 to 2020. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1503. Published 2022 Aug 6. Doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13940-0
25. Gerding T, Davis KG, Wang J. An Investigation into Occupational Related Stress of At-Risk Workers During COVID-19. Ann Work Expo Health. 2023;67(1):118-128. Doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxac076
26. Gigantesco A, Minardi V, Contoli B, Masocco M. Depressive symptoms among adults in 2018-2019 and during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. J Affect Disord. 2022;309:1-8. Doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.131
27. Orfei MD, Porcari DE, D'Arcangelo S, et al. COVID-19 and Stressful Adjustment to Work: A Long-Term Prospective Study About Homeworking for Bank Employees in Italy. Front Psychol. 2022;13:843095. Published 2022 Mar 17. Doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.843095
28. Eurispes. "Risultati del Rapporto Italia 2021." (available at: https://eurispes.eu/news/risultati-del-rapporto-italia-2021/ ; Last Accessed: 04.01.2024.)
29. Andrade MA, Castro CSM, Batistão MV, Mininel VA, Sato TO. Occupational Profile, Psychosocial Aspects, and Work Ability of Brazilian Workers During COVID-19 Pandemic: IMPPAC Cohort. Saf Health Work. 2022;13(1):104-111. Doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2021.11.004
30. Zgombić J. The impact of workplace on the health and work ability of bank staff. Sigurnost: časopis za sigurnost u radnoj i životnoj okolini, 2014, 56.4: 303-313.
31. Kyrönlahti S, Neupane S, Nygård CH, Oakman J, Juutinen S, Mäkikangas A. Perceived Work Ability during Enforced Working from Home Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic among Finnish Higher Educational Staff. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(10):6230. Published 2022 May 20. Doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106230
32. Van Steenbergen EF, van der Ven C, Peeters MCW, Taris TW. Transitioning Towards New Ways of Working: Do Job Demands, Job Resources, Burnout, and Engagement Change?. Psychol Rep. 2018;121(4):736-766. doi:10.1177/0033294117740134
33. Galanti T, Guidetti G, Mazzei E, Zappalà S, Toscano F. Work From Home During the COVID-19 Outbreak: The Impact on Employees' Remote Work Productivity, Engagement, and Stress. J Occup Environ Med. 2021;63(7):e426-e432. doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000002236