Developing a Decision Aid Tool for selecting pen-paper observational ergonomics techniques: a quasi-experimental study

Main Article Content

Abdolhamid Tajvar
Hadi Daneshmandi
Mozhgan Seif
Hossein Parsaei
Alireza Choobineh

Keywords

Observational Techniques, Risk Assessment, Decision Aid Tool, Musculoskeletal Disorders, Ergonomics

Abstract


Background: A significant error that may occur during ergonomic risk assessment and invalidate assessment reliability corresponds to technique selection. This study aimed to develop a new tool called the Decision Aid Tool (DAT) to reduce pen-paper observational technique selection errors. Methods: This quasi-experiment before-after study was performed in three phases. In the first phase, the participants’ skills in technique selection were examined by showing them 20 videos of different single-task jobs. In the second phase, the DAT was designed using pen-paper observational techniques. Finally, in the third phase, 115 occupational health specialists included in the study through purposive sampling of experts evaluated the tool’s efficacy. Results: The results of the first phase showed that 62% of participants made an error in selecting the proper technique. The mean and standard deviation scores from the first and third phases were 11.4 ± 6.59 and 39.01 ±1.89, respectively. The mean scores increased significantly after using DAT, and 97.5% of participants could correctly select task techniques. Conclusions: The efficacy of DAT was confirmed in a quasi-experimental before-and-after study. Using DAT increases the participants’ ability to choose the correct technique. The DAT can be functional for practitioners to select the pen-paper observational techniques correctly under the purpose of assessment, the body areas, and the characteristics of the task to be assessed.


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 78 | Supplementary file Downloads 91 PDF Downloads 91

References

1. David GC. Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Occup med. 2005;55(3):190-9. Doi: https://doi:10.1093/occmed/kqi082
2. Diego-Mas JA, Poveda-Bautista R, Garzon-Leal DC. Influences on the use of observational methods by prac-titioners when identifying risk factors in physical work. Ergonomics. 2015;58(10):1660-70. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1023851
3. Lowe BD, Weir PL, Andrews DM. NIOSH, National Institute Occupational Safety and Health. (2014). Obser-vation-based posture assessment: review of current practice and recommendations for improvement. Publication No. 2014–131. Available on line at: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/24085
4. Lowe BD, Dempsey PG, Jones EM. Ergonomics assessment methods used by ergonomics professionals. Appl Ergon. 2019;81(102882. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102882
5. Diego-Mas JA, Alcaide-Marzal J, Poveda-Bautista R. Errors using observational methods for ergonomics assessment in real practice. Hum Factors. 2017;59(8):1173-87. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0018720817723496
6. Takala EP, Pehkonen I, Forsman M, et al. Systematic evaluation of observational methods assessing biome-chanical exposures at work. Scand J Work Environ Health.2010;3-24.
7. Tajvar A, Daneshmandi H, Dortaj E, et al. Common errors in selecting and implementing pen-paper observa-tional methods by Iranian practitioners for assessing work-related musculoskeletal disorders risk: a sys-tematic review. Int J Occup Saf Ergon . 2021;1-7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2021.1905993
8. Roman-Liu D. Comparison of concepts in easy-to-use methods for MSD risk assessment. Appl Ergon .2014;45(3):420-7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.05.010
9. Pascual SA, Naqvi S. An investigation of ergonomics analysis tools used in industry in the identification of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2008;14(2):237-45. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2008.11076755
10. Choobineh A, Rahimifard H, Jahangiri M, Mahmoodkhani S. Musculoskeletal injuries and their associated risk factors in office workplaces. Iran Occup Health. 2012; 8(4):70-81
11. Andreas G-WJ, Johanssons E. Observational methods for assessing ergonomic risks for work-related mus-culoskeletal disorders. A scoping review. Rev Cienc Salud. 2018;16(SPE):8-38.
12. Colombini D, Occhipinti E, Alvarez-Casado E, Waters TR. Manual lifting: A guide to the study of simple and complex lifting tasks, CRC Press, 2012.
13. Kadikon Y, Rahman MNA. Manual material handling risk assessment tool for assessing exposure to. J Eng Appl Sci. 2016;100(10):2226-32.
14. Karwowski W: International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors, -3 Volume Set, CRC Press, 2006.
15. Karwowski W, Szopa A, Soares MM. Handbook of standards and guidelines in human factors and ergonom-ics, CRC Press, 2021.
16. Stanton NA, Hedge A, Brookhuis K, Salas E, Hendrick HW. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics methods, CRC Press, 2004.
17. Chiasson MÈ, Imbeau D, Aubry K, Delisle A. Comparing the results of eight methods used to evaluate risk factors associated with musculoskeletal disorders. Int J Ind Ergon. 2012;42(5):478-88.
18. Dempsey PG, McGorry RW, Maynard WS. A survey of tools and methods used by certified professional er-gonomists. Appl Ergon. 2005;36(4):489-503. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2005.01.007
19. Marras WS. Fundamentals and assessment tools for occupational ergonomics, CRC Press, 2006.
20. Waters T, Lu M-L, Occhipinti E. New procedure for assessing sequential manual lifting jobs using the re-vised NIOSH lifting equation. Ergonomics.2007;50(11):1761-70. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130701674364
21. Battevi N, Menoni O, Ricci MG, Cairoli S. MAPO index for risk assessment of patient manual handling in hos-pital wards: a validation study. Ergonomics. 2006;49(7):671-87. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130600581041
22. Kong YK, Lee SJ, Lee KS, Kim GR, Kim DM. Development of an ergonomics checklist for investigation of work-related whole-body disorders in farming–AWBA: Agricultural whole-body assessment. J Agric Saf Health. 2015;21(4):207-15. Doi: https://doi:10.13031/jash.21.10647
23. Schaub K, Caragnano G, Britzke B, Bruder R. The European assembly worksheet. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2013;14(6):616-39. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2012.678283
24. Sonne M, Villalta DL, Andrews DM. Development and evaluation of an office ergonomic risk checklist: RO-SA–Rapid office strain assessment. Appl Ergon.2012;43(1):98-108.Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2011.03.008
25. Hignett S, McAtamney L. Rapid entire body assessment (REBA). Appl Ergon.2000;31(2):201-5. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(99)00039-3
26. McAtamney L, Corlett EN. RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disor-ders. Appl Ergon.1993;24(2):91-9. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(93)90080-S
27. Karhu O, Härkönen R, Sorvali P, Vepsäläinen P. Observing working postures in industry: Examples of OWAS application. Appl Ergon.1981;12(1):13-7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(81)90088-0
28. Abd Rahman MN, RANI MRA, Rohani JM. WERA: an observational tool develop to investigate the physical risk factor associated with WMSDs. J Hum Ergol. 2011;40(1_2):19-36. Doi: https://doi.org/10.11183/jhe.40.19