Occupational class differences in ankle-brachial index and pulse wave velocity measurements to detect subclinical vascular disease

Main Article Content

Marco Mario Ferrario https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2741-7124
Giulia Martire
Francesco Gianfagna https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4615-0816
Paolo Lasalvia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4264-220X
Federico Cremonesi
Matteo Tozzi
Marco Franchin
Francesca Campana
Mattia Roncaioli
Marco Cavicchiolo
Rossana Borchini
Licia Iacoviello https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0514-5885
Giovanni Veronesi https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4119-6615


Socio-occupational classes, Atherosclerosis, Arterial stiffness, Cardiovascular prevention, Work settings


Background: High pulse wave velocity (PWV) and low ankle brachial index (ABI) have been proposed as surrogate end-points for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Objectives: In a cross-sectional setting, we aimed at assessing the distributions of PWV and ABI among occupational classes (OC) in a population-based ever-employed salaried sample. Methods: We enrolled 1388 salaried CVD-free workers attending a CVD population-based survey, the RoCAV study, and classified them into four OC, based on current or last job title: manager/director (MD), non-manual (NMW), skilled-manual (SMW) and (UMW) unskilled-manual workers. We derived brachial-ankle PWV and ABI from four-limb blood pressures measurements, then carotid-femoral PWV (cfPWV) was estimated. We estimated the OC gradients in cfPWV and ABI using linear and logistic regression models. Results: Compared to MD (reference category), UMW had higher age- and BMI-adjusted cfPWV mean values both in men (0.63 m/s; 95%CI:0.11-1.16) and women (1.60 m/s; 0.43-2.77), only marginally reduced when adjusting for CVD risk factors. Decreased ABI mean values were also detected in lower OC. The overall detection rate of abnormal cfPWV (≥12 m/s) or ABI (≤0.9) values was 28%. Compared to MD, the prevalence of abnormal cfPWV or ABI was higher in NMW (OR=1.77; 95%CI:1.12-2.79), SMW (1.71; 1.05-2.78) and UMW (2.72; 1.65-4.50). Adjustment for CVD risk factors used in risk score equations did not change the results. Discussion: We found a higher prevalence of abnormal values of arterial stiffness measures in lower OC, and these differences were not explained by traditional CVD risk factors. These may be presumably determined by additional work- and environmental-related risk factors.


Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 441 | PDF Downloads 230


1. GBD 2017 Risk Factor Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392:1923-1994.
2. Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, et al. 2016 European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: the Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts): developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016;37:2315-81
3. Cooney, MT, Selmer, R, Lindman, A. Cardiovascular risk estimation in older persons: SCORE O.P. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016; 23:1093–1103.
4. D’Agostino RB Sr, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, et al. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2008;117:743–53
5. Veronesi G, Gianfagna F, Giampaoli S, et al. Validity of a long-term cardiovascular disease risk prediction equation for low-incidence populations: the CAMUNI-MATISS Cohorts Collaboration study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 Dec;22(12):1618-25.
6. Yeboah J, McClelland RL, Polonky TS et al. Comparison of novel risk markers for improvement in cardiovascular risk assessment in intermediate-risk individuals. JAMA. 2012; 308 (8):788-95.
7. Veronesi G, Giampaoli S, Vanuzzo D, et al. Combined use of short-term and long-term cardiovascular risk scores in primary prevention: an assessment of clinical utility. J Cardiovasc Med. 2017 May;18(5):318-324.
8. Blankenberg S, Salomaa V, Makarova N, et al. Troponin I and cardiovascular risk prediction in the general population: the BiomarCaRE consortium. Eur Heart J. 2016; Aug 7;37(30):2428-37
9. Neumann JT, Twerenbold R, Ojeda F, et al. Application of High-Sensitivity Troponin in Suspected Myocardial Infarction. Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 27;380(26):2529-2540.
10. Waldeyer C, Makarova N, Zeller T et al. Lipoprotein(a) and the risk of cardiovascular disease in the European population: results from the BiomarCaRE consortium. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(32):2490-2498.
11. Ferrario MM, Veronesi G, Chambless LE, et al. The contribution of educational class in improving accuracy of cardiovascular risk prediction across European regions: The MORGAM Project Cohort Component. Heart. 2014 Aug;100(15):1179-87.
12. Veronesi G, Ferrario MM, Kuulasmaa K, et al. Educational class inequalities in the incidence of coronary heart disease in Europe. Heart. 2016 Jun 15;102(12):958-65.
13. Ferrario MM, Veronesi G, Kee F, et al. Determinants of social inequalities in stroke incidence across Europe: a collaborative analysis of 126 635 individuals from 48 cohort studies. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Dec;71(12):1210-1216.
14. Ferrario MM, Veronesi G, Chambless LE, et al. The contribution of major risk factors and job strain to occupational class differences in coronary heart disease incidence: the MONICA Brianza and PAMELA population-based cohorts. Occup Environ Med. 2011;68:717-722.
15. Veronesi G, Tunstall-Pedoe H, Ferrario MM et al. Combined effect of educational status and cardiovascular risk factors on the incidence of coronary heart disease and stroke in European cohorts: Implications for prevention. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 Mar;24(4):437-445.
16. Hamad R, Penko J, Kazi DS, et al. Association of low socioeconomic status with premature coronary heart disease in US adults. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(8):899-908.
17. Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment. Occupational Exposures and Cardiovascular Disease [Internet]. Stockholm: Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU); 2015: SBU Yellow Report No. 240.
18. Lelieveld J, Klingmuller K, Pozzer A, et al. Cardiovascular disease burden from ambient air pollution in Europe reassessed using novel hazard ratio functions. European Heart Journal. 2019; 40: 1590-1596.
19. Hèritier H, Vienneau D, Foraster M, et al. A systematic analysis of mutual effects of transportation noise and air pollution exposure on myocardial infarction mortality: a nationwide cohort study in Switzerland. European Heart Journal. 2019; 40: 598-603.
20. Ferrario MM, Roncaioli M, Veronesi G, et al. Differing associations for sport versus occupational physical activity and cardiovascular risk. Heart 2018;104:1165-1172.
21. Skogstad M, Johannessen HA, Tynes T, Mehlum IS, Nordby KC, Lie A. Systematic review of the cardiovascular effects of occupational noise. Occup Med. 2016;66:500.
22. Li J, Pega F, Ujita Y, et al. The effect of exposure to long working hours on ischaemic heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury. Environ Int. 2020;142:105739.
23. Kivimäki M, Nyberg ST, Batty GD, et al. Job strain as a risk factor for coronary heart disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet. 2012;380:1491-1497.
24. Ferrario MM, Veronesi G, Bertù L, et al. Job strain and the incidence of coronary heart diseases: does the association differ among occupational classes? A contribution from a pooled analysis of Northern Italian cohorts. BMJ Open. 2017; 24;7(1):e014119.
25. Ferrario MM, Landsbergis P, Tsutsumi A, et al. Work environment: an opportunity for ground-breaking collaborations in cardiovascular disease prevention. ICOH Scientific Committee on Cardiology in Occupational Health. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017;24(2_suppl):4-6.
26. Veronesi G, Borchini R, Landsbergis P, et al. Cardiovascular disease prevention at the workplace: assessing the prognostic value of lifestyle risk factors and job-related conditions. Int J Public Health. 2018;63:723-732.
27. Ohkuma T, Ninomiya T, Tomiyama H, et al. Brachial-Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity and the Risk Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis. Hypertension. 2017;69:1045-1052.
28. Zhong Q, Hu MJ, Cui YJ, et al. Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity in the Prediction of Cardiovascular Events and Mortality: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Angiology. 2018;69:617-629.
29. Sequí-Domínguez I, Cavero-Redondo I, Álvarez-Bueno C, et al. Accuracy of Pulse Wave Velocity Predicting Cardiovascular and All-Cause Mortality. A Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis. J Clin Med. 2020;9:e2080.
30. Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, Terentes-Printzios D, Ioakeimidis N, Stefanadis C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with brachial-ankle elasticity index: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertension. 2012;60:556-562.
31. Vlachopoulos C, Georgakopoulos C, Koutagiar I, Tousoulis D. Diagnostic modalities in peripheral artery disease. Current Opinion in Pharmacology. 2018;39:68-76.
32. Liu L, Sun H, Nie F, Hu X. Prognostic Value of Abnormal Ankle-Brachial Index in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis. Angiology. 2020;71:491-497.
33. Gianfagna F, Veronesi G, Bertù L, et al. Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms and its relation with cardiovascular risk stratification: protocol of the Risk of Cardiovascular diseases and abdominal aortic aneurysm in Varese (RoCAV) population based study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016;16:243.
34. Conroy RM, Pyorala K, Fitgerald AP, et al. Estimation of the ten-year risk of fata cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. Eur H J. 2003;24:987-1003
35. Ferrario M, Chiodini P, Chambless LE, et al. Prediction of coronary events in a low incidence population. Assessing accuracy of the CUORE Cohort Study prediction equation. International J Epidemiol. 2005; 34: 413-21.
36. Diehm N, Dick F, Czuprin C, Lawall H, Baumgartner I, Diehm C. Oscillometric measurement of ankle-brachial index in patients with suspected peripheral disease: comparison with Doppler method. Swiss Med Wkly. 2009;139:357-363.
37. Lortz J, Halfmann L, Burghardt A, et al. Rapid and automated risk stratification by determination of the aortic stiffness in healthy subjects and subjects with cardiovascular disease. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0216538.
38. Hiatt WR. Medical treatment of peripheral arterial disease and claudication. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1608-1621.
39. Charles LE, Fekedulegn D, Burchfiel CM, et al. Associations of work hours with carotid intima-media thickness and ankle-brachial index: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Occup Environ Med. 2012;69:713-720.
40. Li-Ping Chou, Chung-Yi Li, Susan C. Hu. Work-related psychosocial hazards and arteriosclerosis: a cross-sectional study among medical employees in a regional hospital in Taiwan. Int Heart J. 2015;56: 644-650.
41. Caldwell AR, Gallagher KM, Harris BT, et al. Prolonged standing increases lower limb arterial stiffness. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018;118:2249-2258.
42. Tsutsumi A. Prevention and management of work-related cardiovascular disorders. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2015;28:4-7.
43. Benchimol D, Pillois X, Oysel-Mestre M, Sagardiluz P, Bonnet J. Ankle brachial index using an automatic blood pressure device in occupational medicine: relevance in routine examination and comparison with Framingham cardio-vascular risk score. Int J Clin Pract 2012;66:862-866.
44. Park HW, Kim HR, Kang MG, et al. Predictive value of the combination of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity and ankle-brachial index for cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Coron Artery Dis. 2020;31:157-165.