Work-family conflict during the Covid-19 pandemic: teleworking of administrative and technical staff in healthcare. An Italian study Work-family conflict during the Covid-19 pandemic in healthcare

Main Article Content

Chiara Ghislieri https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4002-8756
Monica Molino https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7002-0088
Valentina Dolce https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7127-0620
Domenico Sanseverino
Michele Presutti

Keywords

Covid-19 emergency; Work-family conflict; Remote working; Use of technologies; Recovery

Abstract

Background: Remote working (more appropriately, mandatory work from home) during the Covid-19 healthcare emergency has increased significantly. Amidst many critical issues, work-family conflict (WFC) remains a central topic, due to the hardships in separating different life domains, the pervasiveness of technology, and decreased opportunities for recovery, all considering new, emerging job demands. Although many studies have involved healthcare workers, less attention has been paid to technical-administrative staff (TA); moreover, previous studies about the impact of remote working on WFC have provided mixed results. Objectives: The study aims at examining the relationships between WFC and cognitive demands, off-work hours technology assisted job demands (off-TAJD) and recovery, in the TA of a hospital in northwest Italy. Methods: A sample of 211 individuals (response rate of 58%), in line with the population, filled in an online self-report questionnaire in the second half of April 2020. Results: Multiple regression analysis showed a positive relationship between WFC and perceived ICT stress, off-TAJD and cognitive demands, and a negative relationship with recovery. Conclusions: The results confirm the role of cognitive demands, technology overload and invasiveness, as potential predictors of WFC. The results also indicate the mitigating role of recovery, even in the face of a prolonged and forced experience of remote work. The study emphasises the need for transparent policies, based on trust, autonomy and right to disconnect, and the centrality of training, especially for supervisors, on topics such as evaluation of results, proper recovery management and correct use of technology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 116 | PDF Downloads 63

References

Kniffin KM, Narayanan J, Anseel F, Antonakis J, Ashford SP, Bakker AB, et al. COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. Am Psychol. 2020, in press.
Rudolph C, Allan B, Clark M, et al. Pandemics: Implications for research and practice in industrial and organisational psychology. industrial and organisational psychology. (2020). Available on line at: https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/49757) (last accessed 21-11-2020)
Escudero-Castillo I, Mato-Diaz F, Rodriguez-Alvarez A. Furloughs, Teleworking and Other Work Situations during the COVID-19 Lockdown: Impact on Mental Well-Being. J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(6):2898. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062898
Tavares AI. Telework and health effects review. Int J Healthcare. 2017;3(2): 30-36. doi: 10.5430/ijh.v3n2p30
Vayre É. Les incidences du télétravail sur le travailleur dans les domaines professionnel, familial et social. Trav Humain. 2019; 82(1): 1-39.
Colombo L, Ghislieri C. The work-to-family conflict: Theories and measures. TPM Test Psychom Methodol Appl Psychol. 2008;15(1):35–55.
Voydanoff P. Consequences of Boundary-Spanning Demands and Resources for Work-to-Family Conflict and Perceived Stress. J Occup Health Psych. 2005;10(4): 491-503. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.10.4.491
Noor NM, Zainuddin M. Emotional labor and burnout among female teachers: Work–family conflict as mediator. Asian J Soc Psychol. 2011;14(4): 283-293. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2011.01349.x
Sheraton M, Deo N, Dutt T, Surani S, Hall-Flavin D, Kashyap R. Psychological effects of the COVID 19 pandemic on healthcare workers globally: A systematic review. Psychiatry Res. 2020;292:113360. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113360
Magnavita N. Psychosocial factors in indoor work-related symptoms. Application of the MM040/IAQ questionnaire. Med Lav. 2014;105(4): 269-281. Available from: https://www.mattioli1885journals.com/index.php/lamedicinadellavoro/article/view/3102
Toscano F, Zappalà S. Smart working in Italia: origine, diffusione e possibili esiti. Psicol Soc. 2020;2:203-223.
Azar S, Khan A, Van Eerde W. Modelling linkages between flexible work arrangements’ use and organisational outcomes. J Bus Res. 2018;91:134-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.004
Gajendran RS, Harrison DA. The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: MetaAnalysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2007;92(6):1524-1541. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
Merton RK, Merton RC. Social theory and social structure. Simon and Schuster, 1968.
Goode WJ. A Theory of Role Strain. Am Sociol Rev. 1960;25(4):483-496. doi: 10.2307/2092933
Greenhaus JH, Beutell NJ. Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Acad Manage Rev. 1985;10(1):76-88.
French KA, Dumani S, Allen TD, Shockley KM. A meta-analysis of work-family conflict and social support. Psychol Bull. 2018;144(3):284-314. doi: 10.1037/bul0000120
Colombo L, Zito M, Ghislieri C. Work-to-family influence and social supports: job satisfaction in a north-Italy public health organization -differences between medical and administrative staff. Med Lav. 2012;34(1): 25-33.
Ghislieri C, Molino M, Gatti P. The relationship between work-family interface and turnover intention: a study in a sample of Italian nurses. Med Lav. 2015;106(3):206-215.
Cortese CG, Colombo L, Ghislieri C. Determinants of nurses’ job satisfaction: the role of work-family conflict, job demand, emotional charge and social support. J Nurs Manag. 2010;18(1):35-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.01064.x
Allen TD, French KA, Dumani S, Shockley KM. A cross-national meta-analytic examination of predictors and outcomes associated with work-family conflict. J Appl Psychol. 2020;105(6):539-576. doi: 10.1037/apl0000442
Allen TD, Johnson RC., Kiburz K, & Shockley KM. Work-family conflict and flexible work arrangements: Deconstructing flexibility. Pers Psychol. 2013;66(2): 345-376. doi: 10.1111/peps.12012
Golden TD, Veiga JF, Dino RN. The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication-enhancing technology matter? J Appl Psychol. 2008;93(6):1412-1421. doi: 10.1037/a0012722
Ga S, Yoon D. The effect of work-related ICT use during non-business hours on the work-family conflict: The moderated-mediation effect of work-life balance and workaholism. Product Rev. 2019;33(4):211-238.
Hammer LB, Neal MB, Newsom JT, Brockwood KJ, Colton CL. A longitudinal study of the effects of dual-earner couples’ utilization of family-friendly workplace supports on work and family outcomes. J Appl Psychol. 2005;90(4):799-810. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.799.
Bakker AB, Demerouti E. The Job Demands‐Resources model: state of the art. J Manag Psychol. 2007;22(3):309-328. doi: 10.1108/02683940710733115
Meijman T, Mulder G. Psychological aspects of workload. In Drenth P, de Wolff C (eds.): Handbook of work and organisational psychology. Hove: Psychology Press, 1998: 5-33.
Ghislieri C, Emanuel F, Molino M, Cortese CG, Colombo L. New technologies smart, or harm work-family boundaries management? Gender differences in conflict and enrichment using the JD-R theory. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1070. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01070
Vayre E, Vonthron A-M. Identifying work-related internet’s uses-at work and outside usual workplaces and hours-and their relationships with work-home interface, work engagement, and problematic internet behavior. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2118. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02118
Dolce V, Vayre E, Molino M, Ghislieri C. Far Away, So Close? The Role of Destructive Leadership in the Job Demands–Resources and Recovery Model in Emergency Telework. Soc Sci. 2020;9(11):196. doi: 10.3390/socsci9110196
Molino M, Ingusci E, Signore F, Manuti A, Giancaspro ML, Russo V, et al. Wellbeing Costs of Technology Use during Covid-19 Remote Working: An Investigation Using the Italian Translation of the Technostress Creators Scale. Sustainability. 2020;12(15): 5911. doi: 10.3390/su12155911
Molino M, Cortese CG, Ghislieri C. Unsustainable Working Conditions: The Association of Destructive Leadership, Use of Technology, and Workload with Workaholism and Exhaustion. Sustainability. 2019;11(2):446. doi: 10.3390/su11020446
Atanasoff L, Venable MA. Technostress: implications for adults in the workforce. The Career Dev Q. 2017;65(4):326-338. doi: 10.1002/cdq.12111
Hobfoll SE, Wells JD. Conservation of Resources, Stress, and Aging. In Lomranz J (ed.): Handbook of aging and mental health: an integrative approach. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1998: 121-134.
Sonnentag S, Fritz C. The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. J Occup Health Psychol. 2007;12(3):204-221. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204
Kinnunen U, Feldt T, Siltaloppi M, Sonnentag S. Job demands–resources model in the context of recovery: Testing recovery experiences as mediators. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2011;20(6):805-832.
Sonnentag S, Bayer U-V. Switching off mentally: predictors and consequences of psychological detachment from work during off-job time. J Occup Health Psychol. 2005;10(4):393-414. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.10.4.393
Moreno-Jiménez B, Mayo M, Sanz-Vergel AI, Geurts S, Rodríguez-Muñoz A, Garrosa E. Effects of work-family conflict on employees’ well-being: the moderating role of recovery strategies. J Occup Health Psychol. 2009;14(4): 427-440. doi: 10.1037/a0016739.
Netemeyer RG, Boles JS. Development and Validation of Work-Family Conflict and Family-Work Conflict Scales. J Appl Psychol. 1996;81(4):400-410. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.400
Veldhoven MV, Jonge JD, Broersen S, Kompier M, Meijman T. Specific relationships between psychosocial job conditions and job-related stress: A three-level analytic approach. Work Stress. 2002;16(3): 207-228. doi: 10.1080/02678370210166399
Molino M, Cortese CG, Ghislieri C. Daily Effect of Recovery on Exhaustion: A Cross-Level Interaction Effect of Workaholism. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 04;15(9). doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091920
Tams S, Ahuja M, Thatcher J, Grover V. Worker stress in the age of mobile technology: The combined effects of perceived interruption overload and worker control. J Strateg Inf Syst. 2020;29(1):101595. doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101595
Tavares F, Santos E, Diogo A, Ratten V. Teleworking in Portuguese communities during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Enterprising Communities People Places Glob Econ. 2020; ahead-of-print. doi: 10.1108/JEC-06-2020-0113
Vayre É. Les incidences du télétravail sur le travailleur dans les domaines professionnel, familial et social. Trav Humain. 2019; 82(1): 1-39.
Derks D, van Mierlo H, Schmitz EB. A diary study on work-related smartphone use, psychological detachment and exhaustion: examining the role of the perceived segmentation norm. J Occup Health Psychol. 2014;19(1):74-84. doi: 10.1037/a0035076
Dettmers J. How extended work availability affects well-being: The mediating roles of psychological detachment and work-family-conflict. Work Stress. 2017;31(1):24-41.
Allen TD, Golden TD, Shockley KM. How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2015;16(2):40-68. doi: 10.1177/1529100615593273
Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 2020;395(10227):912-920. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8
French KA, Shockley KM. Formal and informal supports for managing work and family. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2020;29(2):207-216. doi: 10.1177/0963721420906218
Greer TW, Payne SC. Overcoming telework challenges: Outcomes of successful telework strategies. Psychol Manag J. 2014;17(2):87-111. doi: doi.org/10.1037/mgr0000014