“Risk of tumor implantation in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in the upper aerodigestive tumors”. Can the “non-pull” methods and the surgical approaches be definitively discarded?

Main Article Content

Damiano Bisogni https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8086-3257
Laura Fortuna
Roberto Manetti
Luca Talamucci
Michele Di Marino

Keywords

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, aerodigestive tumors, PEG site metastases, “non-pull” methods, discard of the surgical strategies

Abstract

.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 109 | PDF Downloads 33

References

1. Vincenzi F, De Caro G, Gaiani F, et al. Risk of tumor implantation in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in the upper aerodigestive tumors. Acta Biomed. 2018 Dec 17;89(8-S):117-121.
2. Montes de Oca MK, Nye A, Porter C, et al. Head and neck cancer PEG site metastases: Association with PEG placement method. Head Neck. 2019 May;41(5):1508-1516.
3. Rowell NP. Tumor implantation following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion for head and neck and oesophageal cancer: Review of the literature. Head Neck. 2019 Jun;41(6):2007-2015.
4. Fung E, Strosberg DS, Jones EL, et al. Incidence of abdominal wall metastases following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement in patients with head and neck cancer. Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3623-3627.
5. Siu J, Fuller K, Nadler A, et al. Metastasis to gastrostomy sites from upper aerodigestive tract malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Jan 8.
6. Metkus JS, Cognetti D, Curry J. Percutaneous gastrostomy site metastasis from head and neck tumors: A single institution case series. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2017 Nov 22;2(6):395-397.