Science and Religion: Enemies for life?

Main Article Content

Rosagemma Ciliberti
Chiara Tesi
Roberta Fusco
Alessandro Bonsignore
Marta Licata

Keywords

Antonio Neviani, teaching of the theory of evolution, Darwin’s theory, Paleoanthropology

Abstract

The article published by Prof. Antonio Neviani in 1896 offered us an interesting opportunity to discuss about the teaching of human evolution in schools today. Already at the end of the nineteenth century, Neviani complained about the fact that the teaching of the theory of evolution was not present in schools.  Here we present the thought of Neviani and we invite to reflect on the prohibition, still present in some countries, of the teaching of Darwin’s theory.

a

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Abstract 17 | PDF Downloads 17

References

References

1. Bleckmann CA. Evolution and Creationism in Science: 1880–2000. BioSci 2006; 56(2): 151–8.
2. Neviani A. Il Pitecantropo e la origine naturale dell’uomo. Rivista Italiana di Scienze Naturali 1896; 16(19): 113–7.
3. Bülent K, Esra Özay K. Future of Evolution Education in Turkey: Does Academic Staff in Biological Sciences Accept Evolution? December 2018. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2527890
4. Blancke S, Hjermitslev HH, Braeckman J, Kjærgaard PC. Creationism in Europe: facts, gaps and prospects. J Am Acad Relig 2013; 81(4): 996–1028.
5. Graebsch A, Schiermeier Q. Anti-evolutionists raise their profile in Europe. Nat 2006; 444/7121:803.
6. Gluckman PD, Low FM, Buklijas T, Hanson MA, Beedle SA. How evolutionary principles improve the understanding of human health and disease. Evol Appl 2011; 4(2): 249–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00164.x
7. Borczyk B. Creationism and the Teaching of Evolution in Poland. Evo Edu Outreach 2010; 3: 614–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0292-3
8. Crivellaro F, Sperduti A. Accepting and understanding evolution in Italy: a case study from a selected public attending a Darwin Day celebration. Evo Edu Outreach 2014; 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-014-0013-4.
9. Clément P, Quessada M-P. Creationist beliefs in Europe. Sci 2009; 324: 1644. 10.1126/science.324_1644°.
10. Allmon WD. Why don’t people think evolution is true? Implications for teaching, in and out of the classroom.Evolution: Education and Outreach 2011; 4: 648–65. 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00188.x
11. Times of Israel. Israeli schools largely avoid teaching evolution — report. https://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-schools-largely-avoid-teaching-evolution-report/
12. Shaked H, Ilan B. Israel’s Official Policy with Regard to Teaching Evolution in Public Schools. Int J Jewish Ed Res 2014; 7: 93–111.
13. Michael Dixon. The removal of Darwin and evolution from schools is a backwards step. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/oct/03/darwin-theory-evolution-schools-earth
14. Bast F, Tahilramani H. Public Acceptance of Evolution in India. J Sci Temper 2018; 6(1-2): 24–38
15. Moore R, Miksch KL. Evolution, Creationism, and the Courts: 20 Questions. Sci Ed Rev 2003; 2(1):1–12
16. Coyne JA. Science, religion, and society: the problem of evolution in America. Evol 2012; 66: 2654–63. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01664.x
17. Angus Reid Public Opinion. Americans are creationists; Britons and Canadians side with evolution.2010. http://www.angus-reid.com/wp content/uploads/2012/09/2012.09.05_CreEvo.pdf
18. Stears M, Clement P, James A, Dempster E. Creationist and evolutionist views of South African teachers with different religious affiliations. S Afr J Sci 2016; 112: 5–6.
19. Page C. God in a scientific world: Creationism V Evolution. J Undergraduate Res 2014; 7(1).
20. Ratzinger J. Wer ist das eigentlich - Gott?. (1969) München.
21. Ciliberti R, Ventura F, Licata M: Bishop dies and donates his body to science. Educación Médica, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.edumed.2018.07.008.
22. Gödel K. Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme, I. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik 1931; 38: 173–198 .Translated in van Heijenoort: From Frege to Gödel. Harvard: Harvard University Press; 1971.