The efficacy and safety of procedural sedoanalgesia performed by emergency physicians in the emergency department of Piacenza. A single-center retrospective observational study.

The efficacy and safety of procedural sedoanalgesia performed by emergency physicians in the emergency department of Piacenza. A single-center retrospective observational study.

Authors

  • Giorgia Borio Emergency Department, Ospedali Riuniti di Padova Sud, Padova, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9233-9332
  • Erika Poggiali Emergency Department, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza, Italy
  • Andrea Vercelli Emergency Department, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza, Italy
  • Enrico Fabrizi DISES & DSS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy

Keywords:

sedoanalgesia, procedural sedation, Emergency Medicine, Midazolam, fentanest, morphine

Abstract

Procedural sedation (PSA) is a common procedure performed in the emergency department (ED) and represents a fundamental skill for emergency physicians (EP). However, only a few studies have looked at the overall success and incidence of complications of PSA administered by non-anesthesiologists. This study aims to examine the effectiveness and safety of PSA administered by EPs in the ED.

Methods: This is a single-center retrospective observational study of patients undergoing PSA in the ED of Piacenza (Emilia-Romagna, Italy) between January 1, 2022, and May 21, 2023, for electric cardioversion, bone dislocation or fracture reductions, and pacing. Patients’ demographic data, nil per os time, doses and combination of drugs, vital signs, and incidence of adverse events (AEs) were recorded. 

Results: Three hundred and seventeen patients were enrolled. The most often used intravenous (IV) combination was fentanyl plus midazolam (45%), followed by midazolam alone (41%). In 314 patients (99%), PSA was successfully provided. AEs occurred in 28 out of 317 patients (8.5%). The most common complication was hypoxia (3.1%). No patient required intubation. All the AEs have been successfully managed by EPs. No deaths were recorded.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that EPs can safely and effectively administer PSA in the ED. We suggest the creation of an Italian SPA registry to promote collaboration amongst Italian EDs and the sharing of drug protocols to standardize patients’ pathways.

References

Dewar A, Gray A, Open M, Leal A, Main A. Procedural sedation and analgesia in a large UK emergency department: a 5-year review. Acad Emerg Med 2012;19:738 doi:10.1136/emj.2010.102475

Godwin SA, Burton JH, Gerardo CJ, et al. Clinical policy: procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2014;63:247–5 doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.10.015

Burton JH, Miner JR, Shipley ER, Strout TD, Becker C, Thode HC Jr. Propofol for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia: a tale of three centers. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13:24–30. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.08.011

Harvey M, Cave G, Betham C. Contemporary sedation practice in a large New Zealand emergency department. N Z Med J 2011;124:36–45. PMID: 22016162.

Sacchetti A, Senula G, Strickland J, Dubin R. Procedural sedation in the community emergency department: initial results of the ProSCED registry. Acad Emerg Med 2007;14:41–6. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.05.023

Taylor DM, Bell A, Holdgate A, et al. Risk factors for sedation-related events during procedural sedation in the emergency department. Emerg Med Australas 2011;23:466–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01419.x

Green SM, Roback MG, Krauss BS, et al. Unscheduled Procedural Sedation: A Multidisciplinary Consensus Practice Guideline. Ann Emerg Med. 2019 May;73(5):e51-e65. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.02.022.

Baker SN, Weant KA. Procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department. J Pharm Pract 2011;24:189–95. doi: 10.1177/0897190011400554

Andolfatto G, Willman E. A prospective case series of single-syringe ketamine-propofol (Ketofol) for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia in adults. Acad Emerg Med 2011;18:237– 45. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01010.x

Chudnofsky CR, Weber JE, Stoyanoff PJ, et al. A combination of midazolam and ketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia in adult emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7(3):228– 35. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb01064.x

Miner JR, Biros M, Krieg S, Johnson C, Heegaard W, Plummer D. Randomized clinical trial of propofol versus methohexital for procedural sedation during fracture and dislocation reduction in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2003;10:931–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00646.x

Miner JR, Moore JC, Austad EJ, Plummer D, Hubbard L, Gray RO. Randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial of propofol, 1:1 propofol/ketamine, and 4:1 propofol/ketamine for deep procedural sedation in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2015 May;65(5):479-488.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.08.046.

Hohl CM, Sadatsafavi M, Nosyk B, Anis AH. Safety and clinical effectiveness of midazolam versus propofol for procedural sedation in the emergency department: a systematic review. Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Jan;15(1):1-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2007.00022.x.

Messenger DW, Murray HE, Dungey PE, van Vlymen J, Sivilotti ML. Subdissociative-dose ketamine versus fentanyl for analgesia during propofol procedural sedation: a randomized clinical trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Oct;15(10):877-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00219.x.

Ruth WJ, Burton JH, Bock AJ. Intravenous etomidate for procedural sedation in emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med 2001;8:13. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb00539.x

Hoffman RJ, Barnett G. Does sedation with combined ketamine/propofol (Ketofol) result in feweadverse events than ketamine or propofol alone?. Ann Emerg Med 2011;58:S227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.06.175

Bellolio MF, Gilani WI, Barrionuevo P, et al. Incidence of Adverse Events in Adults Undergoing Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Feb;23(2):119-34. doi: 10.1111/acem.12875.

Jacques KG, Dewar A, Gray A, Kerslake D, Leal A, Lees F. Procedural sedation and analgesia in a large UK emergency department: factors associated with complications. Emerg Med J 2011;28:1036–40. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.102475

Burton JH, Bock AJ, Strout TD, Marcolini EG. Etomidate and midazolam for reduction of anterior shoulder dislocation: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 2002;40:496–504. doi: 10.1067/mem.2002.126607

Patanwala AE, McKinney CB, Erstad BL, Sakles JC. Retrospective analysis of etomidate versus ketamine for first-pass intubation success in an academic emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2014;21:87–91. doi: 10.1111/acem.12292

Green SM, Roback MG, Krauss B. Laryngospasm during emergency department ketamine sedation: a case-control study. Pediatr Emerg Care 2010;26:798–802. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181fa8737

Jamal SM, Fathil SM, Nidzwani MM, Ismail AK, Yatim FM. Intravenous ketamine is as effective as midazolam/fentanyl for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department. Med J Malaysia 2011;66:231–3. PMID: 22111446

Sener S, Eken C, Schultz CH, Serinken M, Ozsarac M. Ketamine with and without midazolam for emergency department sedation in adults: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 2011;57:109–14. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.09.010

Cravero JP, Blike GT, Beach M, et al. Incidence and nature of adverse events during pediatric sedation/ anesthesia for procedures outside the operating room: report from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. Pediatrics 2006;118:1087–96. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0313

Mallory MD, Baxter AL, Yanosky DJ, Cravero JP. Emergency physician-administered propofol sedation: a report on 25,433 sedations from the pediatric sedation research consortium. Ann Emerg Med 2011;57:462–8. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.03.008

Deitch K, Miner J, Chudnofsky CR, Dominici P, Latta D. Does end tidal CO2 monitoring during mergency department procedural sedation and analgesia with propofol decrease the incidence of hypoxic events? A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 2010;55:258–64. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.07.030

Vardy JM, Dignon N, Mukherjee N, Sami DM, Balachandran G, Taylor S. Audit of the safety and effectiveness of ketamine for procedural sedation in the emergency department. Emerg Med J 2008;25:579–82. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.056200

Green SM, Roback MG, Krauss B, et al. Predictors of airway and respiratory adverse events with ketamine sedation in the emergency department: an individual-patient data meta-analysis of 8,282 children. Ann Emerg Med 2009;54:158–68. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.12.011

Bell A, Treston G, McNabb C, Monypenny K, Cardwell R. Profiling adverse respiratory events and vomiting when using propofol for emergency department procedural sedation. Emerg Med Australas 2007;19:405–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.00982.x

Burton JH, Harrah JD, Germann CA, Dillon DC. Does end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring detect respiratory events prior to current sedation monitoring practices? Acad Emerg Med 2006;13. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.12.017

Downloads

Published

12-12-2024

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL CLINICAL RESEARCH

How to Cite

1.
Borio G, Poggiali E, Vercelli A, Fabrizi E. The efficacy and safety of procedural sedoanalgesia performed by emergency physicians in the emergency department of Piacenza. A single-center retrospective observational study. Acta Biomed. 2024;95(6):e2024107. doi:10.23750/abm.v95i6.15966