Academic performance and satisfaction with face-to-face, distance and blended teaching in entry-level physiotherapy programme: a retrospective comparative study
Keywords:
blended learning, pandemic, Physiotherapy, learning method, educationAbstract
Background and aim: The popularity of remote and blended teachings in physiotherapy higher education is increasing. Initial evidence suggests that these methods are as effective as face-to-face teaching for theoretical and practical skill learning in physiotherapy; however, further research is required.
Methods: This was a retrospective comparative study. Three groups of physiotherapy students undertook the courses 'Biomechanics' and 'Kinesiology' through face-to-face, remote, and blended modalities, respectively. We compared the academic performance and satisfaction of three classes that underwent courses delivered face-to-face in 2019, remote in 2020, and blended in 2021. Each course included a basic observational skills section (25%). Oral examination assessed academic performance (mark range: 0-31). Student satisfaction was self-evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale (‘completely dissatisfied’ to ‘completely satisfied’). Differences in outcomes were explored using Fisher’s exact test and Kruskal Wallis test.
Results: In the ‘Biomechanics’ course, the median mark (interquartile range) was 28 (27, 30) for the face-to-face group, 28.5 (27, 29) for the remote group and 29 (27, 30) for the blended group. In the ‘Kinesiology’ course, the median mark was 29 (27, 30) for the face-to-face, 28.0 (28, 30) for the remote and 29 (27, 30) for the blended. No statistically significant differences in academic performance were detected in either course. Satisfaction was good for both courses and teaching modalities; no statistically significant difference was detected.
Conclusions: Students had similar satisfaction and academic performance, suggesting the potential efficiency of varying teaching methods in terms of learning and satisfaction.
References
UNESCO. Available from: https://en.unesco.org/themes/highereducation/digital
Rossettini G, Turolla A, Gudjonsdottir B, et al. Digital entry-level education in physiotherapy: a commentary to inform post-COVID-19 future directions. Medical Science Educator. 2021;31(6):2071-83. 10.1007/s40670-021-01439-z.
Kim KJ, Bonk CJ, Oh E. The present and future state of blended learning in workplace learning settings in the United States. Performance Improvement. 2008;47(8):5-16. doi: 10.1002/pfi.20018.
Simonson M, Zvacek SM, Smaldino S. Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education. 7th ed. 2019.
Rowe M, Frantz J, Bozalek V. The role of blended learning in the clinical education of healthcare students: a systematic review. Med Teach. 2012;34(4) doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.642831.
Remuzzi A, Remuzzi G. COVID-19 and Italy: what next? The Lancet. 2020;395(10231):1225-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30627-9
Veneri D. The role and effectiveness of computer-assisted learning in physical therapy education: a systematic review. Physiother Theory Pract. 2011;27(4):287-98. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2010.493192.
World Physiotherapy. Physiotherapist education framework. London, UK; 2021. Available from: https://world.physio/what-we-do/education/physiotherapist-education-framework
Odegaard NB, Myrhaug HT, Dahl-Michelsen T, Roe Y. Digital learning designs in physiotherapy education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. 2021;21(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02483-w
Vallee A, Blacher J, Cariou A, Sorbets E. Blended learning compared to traditional learning in medical education: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(8) doi: 10.2196/16504.
Vaona A, Banzi R, Kwag KH, et al. E-learning for health professionals. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018(1). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011736.pub2.
Biggs J, Tang C. Teaching for quality learning at university. McGraw-Hill Education (UK); 2011.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335(7624):806-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39335.
University of Verona. Laurea triennale abilitante alla professione sanitaria di Fisioterapista. 2022. Available from: https://www.corsi.univr.it/?ent=cs&id=477&menu=IlCorso&tab=presentazione&lang=it
European Commission. European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS). 2015. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/education/resources-and-tools/european-credit-transfer-and-accumulation-system-ects_en
Belli S, Bozzolan M, Cortini S, Galantini P, Giacobazzi M, Montevecchi V, et al. La formazione "core" del fisioterapista. 2018. Available from: https://aifi.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/corecompetencecorecurriculum.pdf
University of Verona. Comunicato dell'Unità di Crisi (20/03/2020) a seguito del DPCM del 11/03/2020. 2020. Available from: https://www.univr.it/it/info-covid-19-archivio-comunicati
University of Verona. Panopto: piattaforma di video content management. 2020. Available from: https://www.univr.it/it/panopto
University of Verona. Comunicato dell'Unità di Crisi (18/01/2021) a seguito del DPCM del 14/01/2021. 2021. Available from: https://www.univr.it/it/info-covid-19-archivio-comunicati
ANVUR. Agenzia Nazionale di Valutazione del Sistema Universitario e della Ricerca. Valutazione della didattica e assicurazione della qualità. 2020 [cited 2022 21 October]. Available from: https://www.anvur.it/atti-e-pubblicazioni/lavori-di-ricerca/valutazione-della-didattica-e-assicurazione-della-qualita/
University of Verona. Regolamento didattico di Ateneo. 2020. Available from: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/atto/serie_generale/caricaArticolo?art.progressivo=0&art.idArticolo=1&art.versione=1&art.codiceRedazionale=08A03704&art.dataPubblicazioneGazzetta=2008-06-05&art.idGruppo=0&art.idSottoArticolo1=10&art.idSottoArticolo=1&art.flagTipoArticolo=1
Vendrely A. Student assessment methods in physical therapy education: an overview and literature review. Journal of Physical Therapy Education. 2002;16(2):64. doi: 10.1097/00001416-200207000-00010
Team R Core. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2013. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/
World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
European Commission. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. Opinion 05/2014 on Anonymisation Techniques. 2014. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2014/wp216_en.pdf
European Commission. L 295/39 Regolamento (UE) 2018/1725 del Parlamento Europeo e del Consiglio. 2018. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/IT/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018R1725&from=en
European Commission. Ethics and Data Protection. 2018. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/ethics/h2020_hi_ethics-data-protection_en.pdf
Dunleavy G, Nikolaou CK, Nifakos S, Atun R, Law GCY, Tudor Car L. Mobile digital education for health professions: systematic review and meta-analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(2) doi: 10.2196/12937.
Rossettini G, Rondoni A, Palese A, et al. Effective teaching of manual skills to physiotherapy students: a randomised clinical trial. Med Educ. 2017;51(8):826-38 doi: 10.1111/medu.13347.
Garrison DR, Kanuka H. Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education. 2004;7(2):95-105. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
Rossettini G, Geri T, Turolla A, Viceconti A, Scuma C, Mirandola M, et al. Online teaching in physiotherapy education during COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: a retrospective case-control study on students' satisfaction and performance. BMC Medical Education. 2021;21(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02896-1.
Rovai AP, Jordan H. Blended learning and sense of community: a comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2004;5(2):1-13. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v5i2.192
Rossettini G, Conti C, Suardelli M, et al. COVID-19 and health care leaders: how could emotional intelligence be a helpful resource during a pandemic? Phys Ther. 2021;101(9). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab143.
Abdel-Razig S, Ahmad W, Shkoukani MA, et al. Residency training in the time of COVID-19: a framework for academic medical centers dealing with the pandemic. Perspect Med Educ. 2021;10(2):135-40. doi: 10.1007/s40037-020-00622-z.
Forde C, A OB. A literature review of barriers and opportunities presented by digitally enhanced practical skill teaching and learning in health science education. Med Educ Online. 2022;27(1):2068210. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2068210.
El-Sobkey SB. Experience of the Egyptian physical therapy educators on the online teaching during COVID-19 outbreak. Med Educ Online. 2022;27(1):2073861. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2073861.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Andrea Dell'Isola, Jessica Longhini, Andrea Turolla, Antonello Viceconti, Silvia Gianola, Giacomo Beccucci, Alberto Patuzzo, Lia Rodeghiero, Simone Battista, Tommaso Geri, Alvisa Palese, Giacomo Rossettini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.
How to Cite
