Design and implementation of a VR environment aimed at enhancing the Social Anxiety Disorder’s (SAD) treatment. Evaluation of the sense of presence and immersion.
VRET
Keywords:
Virtual Reality (VR), Virtual Reality Treatment (VRET), Social Anxiety DisordersAbstract
Background and aim: We present here a novel approach to Virtual Reality Treatment (VRET) of Social Anxiety Disorders. It is based on a VR ecological scenario (that of a school room with desks), that can be personalized according to the actual fear level of the patient, adjusting the number of school mate that can be present together inside the room and the distance between the desks.
Methods: We then conducted a user study to explore the sense of presence (Presence Questionnaire, PQ), immersive tendencies (Immersive Tendencies Questionnaire, ITQ), and subjective mental workload (NASA Task Load Index, TLX). The study evaluated 34 healthy students (average age: 24.558 years), of which 18 females.
Results: Results from a usability trial are extremely positive. Our data suggests that participants liked mostly the high realism and sense of immersion of the Virtual Environment as well as the possibility to explore it widely. On the other side, the amount of workload of the task was evaluated very low, and therefore users can concentrate on the task.
Conclusions: We conclude the article by discussing possible future directions for a large-scale pilot, that can lead to a solution that can be used at home to train under the guide and periodic supervision of a therapist (www.actabiomedica.it)
References
Sutherland IE. A head-mounted threedimensional display. In: Proceedings of the December 9-11, 1968, Fall Joint Computer Conference, Part I, pp. 757-764.
Qian J, McDonough DJ, Gao Z. The effectiveness of virtual reality exercise on individual’s physiological, psychological, and rehabilitative outcomes: A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(11), 1-17. doi:10.3390/ijerph17114133.
Asadzadeh A, Samad-Soltani T, Salahzadeh Z, Rezaei-Hachesu P. Effectiveness of virtual reality-based exercise therapy in rehabilitation: A scoping review. Inform Med Unlocked 2021; 24, 100562. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2021.100562.
Ioannou A, Papastavrou E, Avraamides MN, Charalambous A. Virtual reality and symptoms management of anxiety, depression, fatigue, and pain: A systematic review. SAGE Open Nurs. 2020; 27; 6:2377960820936163. doi: 10.1177/2377960820936163.
Biao X, Huimin L, Alghofaili R, et al. A review on virtual reality skill training applications. Front Virtual Real 2021; 2, 1-19. doi:10.3389/frvir.2021.645153.
Held JP, Ferrer B, Mainetti R, et al. Autonomous rehabilitation at home based on virtual rehabilitation: safety, usability and compliance, a pilot study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2017; Sep 25. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04802-X.
American Psychiatric Association, DSM-5 Task Force. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5™ (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc, 2013. doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.
McEnery C, Lim MH, Tremain H, Knowles A, Alvarez-Jimenez M. Prevalence rate of social anxiety disorder in individuals with a psychotic disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Res 2019; 208:25-33. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2019.01.045.
Vriends N, Bolt OC, Kunz SM. Social anxiety disorder, a lifelong disorder? A review of the spontaneous remission and its predictors. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2014; 130(2), 109-122. doi:10.1111/acps.12249.
Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62, 593-602. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593.
Stein DJ, Lim CCW, Roest AM, et al. WHO World Mental Health Survey Collaborators. The cross-national epidemiology of social anxiety disorder: Data from the World Mental Health Survey Initiative. BMC Med 2017; 15(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0889-2.
Filho A, Hetem L, Ferrari M, et al. Social anxiety disorder: What are we losing with the current diagnostic criteria? Acta Psychiatr Scand 2010; 121, 216-226. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01459.x
Olfson M, Guardino M, Struening E, Schneier FR, Hellman F, Klein DF. Barriers to the treatment of social anxiety. Am J Psychiatry 2000; 157(4), 521-527. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.157.4.521.
Cipresso P, Giglioli IAC, Raya MA, Riva G. The past, present, and future of virtual and augmented reality research: A network and cluster analysis of the literature. Front Psychol 2018; 9:2086. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02086.
Freeman D, Reeve S, Robinson A, et al. Virtual reality in the assessment, understanding, and treatment of mental health disorders. Psychol Med; 2017, 47, 2393-2400. doi: 10.1017/S003329171700040X.
Colbert A, Yee N, George G. The digital workforce and the workplace of the future. Acad Manage J 2016; 59 (3), 731-739. doi:10.5465/amj.2016.4003.
Wirth W, Hartmann T, Böcking S, et al. A process model of the formation of spatial presence experiences. Media Psychol 2007; 9:493-525. doi:10. 1080/ 15213 26070 12830 79.
Kisker J, Gruber T, Schöne B. Behavioral realism and lifelike psychophysiological responses in virtual reality by the example of a height exposure. Psychol Res 2021; 85, 68-81. doi:10.1007/s00426-019-01244-9.
Makransky G, Petersen GB. The cognitive affective model of immersive learning (CAMIL): a theoretical research-based model of learning in immersive virtual reality. Educ Psychol Rev 2021. doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09586-2.
Lacoche J, Villain E, Foulonneau A. Evaluating usability and user experience of AR applications in VR simulation. Front Virtual Real 2022; 3:881318. doi: 10.3389/frvir.2022.881318
Rózsa S, Hargitai R, Láng A, et al. Measuring immersion, involvement, and attention focusing tendencies in the mediated environment: The applicability of the Immersive Tendencies Questionnaire. Front Psychol 2022; 13:931955. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.931955.
Slater M. A note on presence terminology. Presence Connect, 2003; 3, 1-5.
Schwind V, Knierim P, Haas N, Henze N. Using Presence Questionnaires in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery), 2019; 1-12. doi:10.1145/3290605.3300590.
Felnhofer A, Kothgassner OD, Schmidt M, et al. Exner I. Is virtual reality emotionally arousing? Investigating five emotion inducing virtual park scenarios. Int J Hum Comput Stud 2015; 82, 48-56. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.05.004.
Witmer BG, Singer MJ. Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence 1998; 7(3), 225-240. doi:10.1162/105474698565686.
Kennedy RS, Lane NE, Berbaum KS, Lilienthal MG. Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int J Aviat Psychol 1993; 3, 203-220. doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3.
Grassini S, Laumann K, Rasmussen Skogstad M. The use of virtual reality alone does not promote training performance (but sense of presence does). Front Psychol 2020; 11:1743. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01743.
Chandler P, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cogn Instr 1991; 8(4), 293-332. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2.
Sweller J, van Merriënboer JJG, Paas F. Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educ Psychol Rev, 2019; 31:261-292. doi:10.1007/ s10648- 019- 09465-5.
Breves P, Stein JP. Cognitive load in immersive media settings: the role of spatial presence and cybersickness. Virtual Real 2023; 27, 1077-1089. doi:10.1007/s10055-022-00697-5.
Parong J, Pllard KA, Files BT, et al. The mediating role of presence differs across types of spatial learning in immersive technologies. Comput Hum Behav 2020; 107:106290. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106290.
Jensen L, Konradsen FA. Review of the use of Virtual Reality Head-Mounted Displays in education and training. Educ Inf Technol 2018; 23, 1515-1529. doi:10.1007/s10639-017-9676-0.
Pirovano M, Surer E, Mainetti R, Lanzi PL, Borghese NA. Exergaming and rehabilitation: a methodology for the design of effective and safe therapeutic exergames. Entertain Comput 2016; 14, pp. 55-65. doi:10.1016/j.entcom.2015.10.002.
Botella C, Fernández-Álvarez J, Guillén V. et al. Recent progress in Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for phobias: A systematic review. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2017; 19, 42. doi:10.1007/s11920-017-0788-4. doi:10.1007/s11920-017-0788-4.
Whiting N, Donaldson N. Lessons from integrating the Oculus Rift into Unreal Engine 4. In Oculus Connect Developers Conference, 2014.
Pirovano M, Mainetti R, Baud-Bovy G, Lanzi PL, Borghese NA, IGER - Intelligent Game Engine for Rehabilitation, IEEE Trans. on CIAIG. Vol.8(1), March 2016, pp. 43-55. doi:10.1109/TCIAIG.2014.2368392.
Witmer BJ, Jerome CJ, Singer MJ. The factor structure of the Presence Questionnaire. Presence 2005; 14(3) 298-312. doi:10.1162/105474605323384654.
Hart SG, Staveland L. Development of the NASA task load index (TLX): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P.A. Hancock, N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human Mental Workload, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 139-183, 1988.
Kourtesis P, Korre D, Collina S, Doumas LAA, MacPherson SE. Guidelines for the development of immersive virtual reality software for cognitive neuroscience and neuropsychology: The development of Virtual Reality Everyday Assessment Lab (VR-EAL), a neuropsychological test battery in immersive virtual reality. Front Comput Sci 2020; 1:12. doi: 10.3389/fcomp.2019.00012.
Kim HK, Park J, Choi Y, Choe M. Virtual reality sickness questionnaire (VRSQ): Motion sickness measurement index in a virtual reality environment. Appl Ergon 2018; 69:66-73. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2017.12.016
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2023. https://www.R-project.org/
Marucci M, Di Flumeri G, Borghini G, et al. The impact of multisensory integration and perceptual load in virtual reality settings on performance, workload and presence. Sci Rep 2021; 11(1), 1-15. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-84196-8.
Hébert-Lavoie M, Ozell B, Doyon-Poulin P. The relationship between immersion and psychophysiological indicators. Presence: Virtual and Augmented Reality 2023; 32, 233-262. doi:10.1162/pres_a_00390.
Galy E, Paxion J, Berthelon C. Measuring mental workload with the NASA-TLX needs to examine each dimension rather than relying on the global score: an example with driving. Ergon 2018; 61(4):517-527. doi:10.1080/00140139.2017.1369583.
Oberhauser M, Dreyer D, Braunstingl R, Koglbauer I. What’s real about virtual reality flight simulation? Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors 2018; 8(1), pp. 22-34. doi:10.1027/2192-0923/a000134.
Braarud PØ. Investigating the validity of subjective workload rating (NASA TLX) and subjective situation awareness rating (SART) for cognitively complex human-machine work. Int J Ind Ergon 2021; 78. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103233
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Olimpia Pino, Luca Squadroni, Nunzio Alberto Borghese
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.
How to Cite
