Maximizing rehabilitation outcomes in geriatric hip fracture patients: the impact of surgical variables Optimizing Rehabilitation Success in Geriatric Hip Fracture Surgery

Main Article Content

Oriana Amata
Erminia Ridolo
Valeria Costantino
Lorenzo Panella
Cristoforo Incorvaia
Antonello Valerio Caserta
Camilla Callegari


Functional recovery, Individual rehabilitation program, Surgical techniques, Hip risk, Weight bearing


Background and aim:

Hip fracture is a major traumatic event with high mortality and disability rate. Its management in the acute setting and in the rehabilitation process is highly debated. This study evaluates the possible determinants of hip fracture rehabilitation outcome, among which surgical intervention type, weight-bearing status and hospitalization length


The data of 738 hip fracture patients, who completed rehabilitation process in our centre, were collected and patients’ functional abilities at the time of admission and discharge were analysed.


It has been observed that functional recovery depends on several factors: the type of surgery, the post-operative course and related complications, the hospitalisation time, the surgeon’s techniques and expertise and the Orthopaedics centre where the operation is performed.


In conclusion, data integration in perspective of an individualised rehabilitation program appears crucial for the functional recovery of the hip fracture patient.


Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 75 | PDF Downloads 52


1. Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(12):1726–33. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4.

2. Gullberg B, Johnell O, Kanis JA. World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporos Int. 1997;7(5):407–13. doi: 10.1007/PL00004148.

3. Moerman S, Mathijssen NMC, Tuinebreijer WE, Nelissen RG, Vochteloo AJH. Less than one-third of hip fracture patients return to their prefracture level of instrumental activities of daily living in a prospective cohort study of 480 patients: IADL after a hip fracture. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2018;18(8):1244–8. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13471.

4. Abrahamsen B, Van Staa T, Ariely R, Olson M, Cooper C. Excess mortality following hip fracture: a systematic epidemiological review. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20(10):1633–50. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-0920-3.

5. Amata O, Panella L, Incorvaia C. et al. Role of frailty in functional recovery after hip fracture, the variable impact in restoring autonomy. Acta Biomed. 2022;92(6):e2021387. doi:10.23750/abm.v92i6.11612.

6. Panella L, Incorvaia C, Caserta AV. et al. A bio-psycho-social approach in elderly population: outcome of adapted physical activity in patients with osteoarthritis. Clin Ter. 2020;170(1):e74–7. doi: 10.7417/CT.2020.2192.

7. Roberts KC, Brox WT. AAOS clinical practice guideline: Management of hip fractures in the elderly. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23(2):138–40. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00433.

8. Handoll HHG, Sherrington C, Mak JCS. Interventions for improving mobility after hip fracture surgery in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD001704. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001704.pub4.

9. Pfeufer D, Zeller A, Mehaffey S, Böcker W, Kammerlander C, Neuerburg C. Weight-bearing restrictions reduce postoperative mobility in elderly hip fracture patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019;139(9):1253–9. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03193-9.

10. Canal C, Kaserer A, Ciritsis B, Simmen H-P, Neuhaus V, Pape H-C. Is there an influence of surgeon’s experience on the clinical course in patients with a proximal femoral fracture? J Surg Educ. 2018;75(6):1566–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.04.010.

11. Weller I, Wai EK, Jaglal S, Kreder HJ. The effect of hospital type and surgical delay on mortality after surgery for hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg. 2005;87(3):6. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.87b3.15300

12. Kumar A, Rahman M, Trivedi AN, Resnik L, Gozalo P, Mor V. Comparing post-acute rehabilitation use, length of stay, and outcomes experienced by Medicare fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with hip fracture in the United States: A secondary analysis of administrative data. PLoS Med. 2018;15(6): e1002592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002592.

13. Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF. et al. Studies comparing numerical rating scales, verbal rating scales, and visual analogue scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: A systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011;41(6):1073–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016.

14. Mazzola P, Floris P, Picone D. et al. Functional and clinical outcomes of patients aged younger and older than 85 years after rehabilitation post-hip fracture surgery in a co-managed orthogeriatric unit: Outcomes of hip fracture surgery. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2018;18(8):1194–9. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13440.

15. Galeoto G, Lauta A, Palumbo A. et al. The Barthel Index: Italian translation, adaptation and validation. Int J Neurol Neurother. 2015;2(2):2378–3001. doi: 10.23937/2378-3001/2/1/1028

16. Di Monaco M, Castiglioni C, Di Carlo S. et al. Classes of vitamin D status and functional outcome after hip fracture: a prospective, short-term study of 1350 inpatients. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2019;55(1). doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.18.05191-2.

17. Kumar P, Rajnish RK, Sharma S, Dhillon MS. Proximal femoral nailing is superior to hemiarthroplasty in AO/OTA A2 and A3 intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2020;44(4):623–33. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002592.

18. Tang P, Hu F, Shen J, Zhang L, Zhang L. Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus hemiarthroplasty: A study for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Injury. 2012;43(6):876–81. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.11.008.

19. Ucpunar H, Camurcu Y, Çöbden A, Sofu H, Kis M, Demirel H. Comparative evaluation of postoperative health status and functional outcome in patients treated with either proximal femoral nail or hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fracture. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019;27(3):2309499019864426. doi: 10.1177/2309499019864426.

20. A’Court J, Lees D, Harrison W, Ankers T, Reed MR. Pain and analgesia requirements with hip fracture surgery. Orthop Nurs. 2017;36(3):224–8. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000347.

21. Salpakoski A, Kallinen M, Kiviranta I. et al. Type of surgery is associated with pain and walking difficulties among older people with previous hip fracture: Pain and mobility after hip fracture. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016;16(6):754–61. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12552.

22. Foss NB, Kristensen MT, Palm H, Kehlet H. Postoperative pain after hip fracture is procedure specific. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102(1):111–6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen345.

23. Parker MJ, White A, Boyle A. Fixation versus hemiarthroplasty for undisplaced intracapsular hip fractures. Injury. 2008;39(7):791–5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.01.011.

24. Warren J, Sundaram K, Anis H. et al. The association between weight-bearing status and early complications in hip fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019;29(7):1419–27. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02453-z.

25. Halm EA, Wang JJ, Boockvar K. et al. The effect of perioperative anemia on clinical and functional outcomes in patients with hip fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(6):369–74. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200407000-00007.

26. Edwards C, Counsell A, Boulton C, Moran CG. Early infection after hip fracture surgery: risk factors, costs and outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(6):770-777. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.90B6.20194

Most read articles by the same author(s)