A gender based comparison and correlation of spatiotemporal gait parameters and postural stability Gait Parameters and Postural Stability
Main Article Content
Gait,, Stability, Cadence, Gait Speed, Hill Strike, Gait Cycle, Stride Length
Background and aim: Postural stability during gait is a crucial factor that reduces the risk of falls. Researchers determine the most effective way to assist patients whose postural stability deficit predominantly related to gait parameters. The aim of this study was to investigate the comparison and relationship between spatiotemporal gait parameters and postural stability in young male and female.
Methods: 96 participants (male, and female) with age range from 18-40 years were selected to conduct this cross-sectional correlation study. Any participants with cardiovascular, neuromuscular diseases, musculoskeletal injury, vision, and hearing problem were excluded from the study. To measure spatiotemporal data, the Physilog application by Gaitup was used. Stabilometer was used to assess unipedal dynamic postural stability. Statistical analysis of data was performed by using SPSS software. Mann Whitney U test, Kruskall Wallis H test, and Spearman rank correlation coefficient tests were used to statistical analysis. Results: The results of this study revealed that anteroposterior stability for left leg was significant (p=.002) between male and female. The gait parameters as stride length (Left Leg, p=.050), (Right leg, p=.001); gait speed (Left Leg, p=.006), (Right leg, p=.009); and maximal heel clearance (Left Leg, p=.001), (Right leg, p=.001) were significant between genders. No significant relationship was found among the dynamic postural stability and spatiotemporal parameters of gait.
Conclusions: In summary, this research illustrates the putative mechanisms of gait parameters and postural dynamic stability parameters differences in male and female participants and also relationship among them
1. Herssens N, van Criekinge T, Saeys W, et al. An investigation of the spatio-temporal parameters of gait and margins of stability throughout adulthood. J R Soc Interface. 2020;17(166):20200194. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0194.
2. Asai T, Misu S, Doi T, Yamada M, Ando H. Effects of dual-tasking on control of trunk movement during gait: respective effect of manual- and cognitive-task. Gait Posture. 2014;39(1):54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.05.025.
3. Kelly VE, Janke AA, Shumway-Cook A. Effects of instructed focus and task difficulty on concurrent walking and cognitive task performance in healthy young adults. Exp Brain Res. 2010;207(1-2):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2429-6.
4. Abualait T, Ahsan M. Comparison of gender, age, and body mass index for spatiotemporal parameters of bilateral gait pattern. F1000Res. 2021;10:266. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.51700.2.
5. Cho SH, Park JM, Kwon OY. Gender differences in three dimensional gait analysis data from 98 healthy Korean adults. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004;19(2):145-152. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.10.003.
6. Al-Obaidi S, Wall JC, Al-Yaqoub A, Al-Ghanim M. Basic gait parameters: a comparison of reference data for normal subjects 20 to 29 years of age from Kuwait and Scandinavia. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003;40(4):361-366. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2003.07.0361.
7. Samson MM, Crowe A, de Vreede PL, Dessens JA, Duursma SA, Verhaar HJ. Differences in gait parameters at a preferred walking speed in healthy subjects due to age, height and body weight. Aging (Milano). 2001;13(1):16-21. doi: 10.1007/BF03351489.
8. Lencioni T, Carpinella I, Rabuffetti M, Cattaneo D, Ferrarin M. Measures of dynamic balance during level walking in healthy adult subjects: Relationship with age, anthropometry and spatio-temporal gait parameters. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2020;234(2):131-140. doi: 10.1177/0954411919889237.
9. Chakravarty K., Suman S., Bhowmick B., Sinha A, Das A., "Quantification of balance in single limb stance using kinect," 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2016, 854-858, doi: 10.1109/ICASSP.2016.7471796.
10. Lou C, Pang C, Jing C, et al. Dynamic Balance Measurement and Quantitative Assessment Using Wearable Plantar-Pressure Insoles in a Pose-Sensed Virtual Environment. Sensors (Basel). 2018;18(12):4193. doi: 10.3390/s18124193.
11. Owings TM, Pavol MJ, Foley KT, Grabiner MD. Measures of postural stability are not predictors of recovery from large postural disturbances in healthy older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(1):42-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03027.x.
12. Ku PX, Abu Osman NA, Yusof A, Wan Abas WA. Biomechanical evaluation of the relationship between postural control and body mass index. J Biomech. 2012;45(9):1638-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.03.029.
13. Olchowik G, Tomaszewski M, Olejarz P, Warchoł J, Różańska-Boczula M. The effect of height and BMI on computer dynamic posturography parameters in women. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2014;16(4):53-8.
14. Greve JM, Cuğ M, Dülgeroğlu D, Brech GC, Alonso AC. Relationship between anthropometric factors, gender, and balance under unstable conditions in young adults. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:850424. doi: 10.1155/2013/850424.
15. Hak L, Houdijk H, Beek PJ, van Dieën JH. Steps to take to enhance gait stability: the effect of stride frequency, stride length, and walking speed on local dynamic stability and margins of stability. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82842. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082842.
16. Hak L, Houdijk H, Steenbrink F, et al. Stepping strategies for regulating gait adaptability and stability. J Biomech. 2013;46(5):905-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.12.017.
17. Cromwell RL, Newton RA. Relationship between balance and gait stability in healthy older adults. J Aging Phys Act. 2004;12(1):90-100. doi: 10.1123/japa.12.1.90.
18. Mauch, M. & Kälin, X. 2011. Reliability of the ProKin Type B line system (TechnoBody™) balance system. Internal Project Report, Praxisklinik Rennbahn AG Leistungsdiagnostik Biomechanik Available on https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiR5P6ZvOf8AhX2XqQEHa2JDD8QFnoECA4QAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.woodway.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F04%2Freliability_prokinb_line_system.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0WQhgnin8qwYcekMljzrXe (Access date 20 June 202).
19. Wüest S, Massé F, Aminian K, Gonzenbach R, de Bruin ED. Reliability and validity of the inertial sensor-based Timed "Up and Go" test in individuals affected by stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016;53(5):599-610. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2015.04.0065.
20. Sarkar A, Singh M, Bansal N, Kapoor S. Effects of obesity on balance and gait alterations in young adults. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2011;55(3):227-33.
21. King AC, Challis JH, Bartok C, Costigan FA, Newell KM. Obesity, mechanical and strength relationships to postural control in adolescence. Gait Posture. 2012;35(2):261-265. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.09.017.
22. Oberg T, Karsznia A, Oberg K. Basic gait parameters: reference data for normal subjects, 10-79 years of age. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1993;30(2):210-223. PMID: 8035350.
23. Guffey K, Regier M, Mancinelli C, Pergami P. Gait parameters associated with balance in healthy 2- to 4-year-old children. Gait Posture. 2016;43:165-169. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.09.017.
24. McAndrew Young PM, Dingwell JB. Voluntary changes in step width and step length during human walking affect dynamic margins of stability. Gait Posture. 2012;36(2):219-224. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.02.020.