Revision of total knee arthroplasty with press-fit condylar SIGMA TC3-mobile bearing system and porous metaphyseal sleeves in type AORI type II and III bone defects. A long-term follow-up study: Porous metaphyseal sleeves in knee defects

Revision of total knee arthroplasty with press-fit condylar SIGMA TC3-mobile bearing system and porous metaphyseal sleeves in type AORI type II and III bone defects. A long-term follow-up study

Porous metaphyseal sleeves in knee defects

Authors

  • Fabio Zanchini
  • Davide Piscopo
  • Enrico Pola
  • Valerio Cipolloni
  • Antonio Piscopo Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Sacro Cuore di Gesù Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Benevento, Italy
  • Stefano Cacciapuoti
  • Gabriele Colò
  • Federico Fusini Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Orthopaedic and Trauma Center, University of Turin, via Zuretti 29, 10121, Turin

Keywords:

Revision arthroplasty, Aseptic loosening, bone defects, metaphyseal sleeve.

Abstract

Background and aim: Revision total knee arthroplasty(rTKA) is a challenging and expensive treatment for orthopedic surgeons who have to deal with poor bone quality and bone loss. This study aims to retrospectively evaluate the clinical and radiological results of patients undergoing rTKA and porous metaphyseal sleeves in AORI type II and III bone defects.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective series of continuous patients treated for mechanical failure of TKA. All patients with aseptic loosening of TKR underwent revision arthroplasty. We included only patients with AORI type IIa/b and III bone defects. The Septic revision or other grades of bone defect or patients lost at follow-up or with less than 2 years follow-up were excluded. We evaluated knee function with Oxford Knee Score (OKS) pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and range of motion (flex-ext), while radiological evaluation was performed to evaluate any sign of loosening.

Results: The mean preoperative OKS was 13.85 +/- 5.39 (range 5 -22), and it improved to 33.89 +/- 3.98 (range 20 - 40) (p<0.00001). The mean preoperative VAS was 7.77 +/- 1.33 (range 5 - 9), and it improved to 1.89 +/- 0.92 (range 0 - 4) (p<0.00001). ROM improved from 62.23° +/- 13.71° (range 40° - 90°) to 100.53° +/- 6.93° (range 90° - 120°) (p<0.00001). No signs of loosening or implant migration were reported. Conclusions: Metaphyseal sleeves made knee revision in large bone defects reliable and effective with good results. Good implant stability was reached in all the cases treated with metaphyseal sleeves.

References

Sheth N, Bonadio M, Demange M. Bone Loss in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017;25(5):348–57. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28406878/

Siddiqi A, Chen A, Piuzzi N, Kelly M. The Use of Metaphyseal Cones and Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021;29(18):e904–20. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34432730/

Panegrossi G, Ceretti M, Papalia M, Casella F, Favetti F, Falez F. Bone loss management in total knee revision surgery. Int Orthop. 2014;38(2):419–27. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24407821/

Engh G, Ammeen D. Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instr Course Lect. 1999;48:167–75. Available from: https://europepmc.org/article/med/10098042

Oh J, Scuderi G. Zonal Fixation in Revision TKA: The Key Is Metaphyseal Fixation. J Knee Surg. 2021; Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34507366/

Meneghini R, Lewallen D, Hanssen A. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(1):78–84. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18171960/

Derome P, Sternheim A, Backstein D, Malo M. Treatment of large bone defects with trabecular metal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty: short term clinical and radiographic outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(1):122–6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23702265/

Schmitz H, Klauser W, Citak M, Al-Khateeb H, Gehrke T, Kendoff D. Three-year follow up utilizing tantal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(9):1556–60. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23664075/

Vasso M, Beaufils P, Schiavone Panni A. Constraint choice in revision knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2013;37(7):1279–84. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23700251/

JUDET J, JUDET R, LAGRANGE J. Une technique de libération de l’appareil extenseur dans les raideurs du genou. Mem Acad Chir (Paris). 1956;82(29–30):944–7.

Scior W, Chanda D, Graichen H. Are Stems Redundant in Times of Metaphyseal Sleeve Fixation? J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(10):2444–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31301910/

Mancuso F, Beltrame A, Colombo E, Miani E, Bassini F. Management of metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty. Acta Bio Medica Atenei Parm. 2017;88(Suppl 2):98. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC6178990/

Bugler K, Maheshwari R, Ahmed I, Brenkel I, Walmsley P. Metaphyseal Sleeves for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Good Short-Term Outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(11):1990–4. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26115984/

Graichen H, Scior W, Strauch M. Direct, Cementless, Metaphyseal Fixation in Knee Revision Arthroplasty With Sleeves-Short-Term Results. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(12):2256–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26209287/

Rosso F, Cottino U, Dettoni F, Bruzzone M, Bonasia D, Rossi R. Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA): mid-term outcomes and bone loss/quality evaluation and treatment. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31462273/

Alexander G, Bernasek T, Crank R, Haidukewych G. Cementless metaphyseal sleeves used for large tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(4):604–7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23123042/

Bonanzinga T, Akkawi I, Zahar A, Gehrke T, Haasper C, Marcacci M. Are Metaphyseal Sleeves a Viable Option to Treat Bone Defect during Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review. Joints. 2019;7(1):19–24. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31879726/

Dalury D, Barrett W. The use of metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2016;23(3):545–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26947462/

Huang R, Barrazueta G, Ong A, Orozco F, Jafari M, Coyle C, et al. Revision total knee arthroplasty using metaphyseal sleeves at short-term follow-up. Orthopedics. 2014;37(9):e804–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25350623/

Guo L, Du Y, Zhang M, Sun J, Jin Z, Peng Y, et al. [Short-term effectiveness of revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal Sleeve and MBT implant]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019;33(3):302–6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30874385/

Barnett S, Mayer R, Gondusky J, Choi L, Patel J, Gorab R. Use of stepped porous titanium metaphyseal sleeves for tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: short term results. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(6):1219–24. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24444570/

Fusini F, Aprato A, Massè A, Bistolfi A, Girardo M, Artiaco S. Candida periprosthetic infection of the hip: a systematic review of surgical treatments and clinical outcomes. Int Orthop. 2020;44(1):15–22.

Artiaco S, Fusini F, Colzani G, Aprato A, Zoccola K, Masse’ A. Long-term results of Zweymüller SLL femoral stem in revision hip arthroplasty for stage II and IIIA femoral bone defect: a 9–15-year follow-up study. Musculoskelet Surg. 2019;

Bloch B, Shannak O, Palan J, Phillips J, James P. Metaphyseal Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Provide Reliable Fixation and Excellent Medium to Long-Term Implant Survivorship. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(2):495–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31606290/

Downloads

Published

03-08-2023

Issue

Section

ORTHOPAEDICS AND SURGERY

How to Cite

1.
Zanchini F, Piscopo D, Pola E, et al. Revision of total knee arthroplasty with press-fit condylar SIGMA TC3-mobile bearing system and porous metaphyseal sleeves in type AORI type II and III bone defects. A long-term follow-up study: Porous metaphyseal sleeves in knee defects. Acta Biomed. 2023;94(4):e2023183. doi:10.23750/abm.v94i4.13117