Case series of four complex spinal deformities: new frontiers in pre-operative planning

Main Article Content

Giulia Facco
Rosa Palmisani
Massimiliano Pieralisi
Archimede Forcellese
Monia Martiniani
Nicola Specchia
Antonio Gigante

Keywords

3D printing, surgical planning, complex vertebral deformities, spine, 3D model

Abstract

Background and aim: Osseous and medullar anomalies constitute a hard challenge for interpretation of complex vertebral deformities anatomy. To better frame these deformities three-Dimensional (3D) printing represents a new frontier in this field. The aim of this brief report is describing the use of 3D printed models for surgical planning in four complex vertebral deformity cases treatment.


Methods: Four cases of severe scoliosis were treated between December 2017 and January 2019; patients’ mean age was 12,25 years. Two patients underwent neurosurgical intervention for myelomeningocele at the time of birth. Standard and dynamics X-Ray, Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance (MR) of the column were performed pre-operatively. CT files were implemented to build the 3D model of each spine and selected ribs. The models were 3D printed in thermoplastic material, then used to study the deformities and for surgical planning. A survey proposal about 3D models’ utility and accuracy has been made to 15 residents and 6 main surgeons.


Results: Preparation of each 3D models required about 316.5 minutes and printing time was about 108 hours each. The average cost was 183.16 € to produce one 3D printed model, which resulted useful in surgical planning and educational.


Conclusions: The manufacture of 3D models requires time, resources and multidisciplinary approach, it must be justified by complexity of the case. In this study 3D Printing allowed surgeons to carefully plan and simulate the surgery, ensuring for a better sizing of the implant.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 45 | PDF Downloads 44

References

1. Fessler RG, Sekhar LN. Atlas of Neurosurgical Techniques: Spine and Peripheral Nerves. Thieme; 2006.
2. Sheha ED, Gandhi SD, Colman MW. 3D printing in spine surgery. Ann Transl Med 2019;7:S164. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.08.88.
3. Facco G, Massetti D, Coppa V, et al. The use of 3D printed models for the pre-operative planning of surgical correction of pediatric hip deformities: a case series and concise review of the literature. Acta Bio-Medica Atenei Parm 2022;92:e2021221. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92i6.11703.
4. Facco G, Politano R, Marchesini A, et al. A Peculiar Case of Open Complex Elbow Injury with Critical Bone Loss, Triceps Reinsertion, and Scar Tissue might Provide for Elbow Stability? Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr 2021;16:53–9. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1504.
5. Guarino J, Tennyson S, McCain G, Bond L, Shea K, King H. Rapid prototyping technology for surgeries of the pediatric spine and pelvis: benefits analysis. J Pediatr Orthop 2007;27:955–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/bpo.0b013e3181594ced.
6. Parchi PD, Ferrari V, Piolanti N, et al. Computer tomography prototyping and virtual procedure simulation in difficult cases of hip replacement surgery. Surg Technol Int 2013;23:228–34.
7. Facco G, Greco L, Mandolini M, et al. Assessing 3-D Printing in Hip Replacement Surgical Planning. Radiol Technol 2022;93:246–54.
8. Giannetti S, Bizzotto N, Stancati A, Santucci A. Minimally invasive fixation in tibial plateau fractures using an pre-operative and intra-operative real size 3D printing. Injury 2017;48:784–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.11.015.
9. Bizzotto N, Tami I, Tami A, et al. 3D Printed models of distal radius fractures. Injury 2016;47:976–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.01.013.
10. Mitsouras D, Liacouras P, Imanzadeh A, et al. Medical 3D Printing for the Radiologist. Radiogr Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc 2015;35:1965–88. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015140320.
11. Wei Y-P, Lai Y-C, Chang W-N. Anatomic three-dimensional model-assisted surgical planning for treatment of pediatric hip dislocation due to osteomyelitis. J Int Med Res 2019:300060519854288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060519854288.
12. Ozturk AM, Sirinturk S, Kucuk L, et al. Multidisciplinary Assessment of Planning and Resection of Complex Bone Tumor Using Patient-Specific 3D Model. Indian J Surg Oncol 2019;10:115–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-018-0852-5.
13. Yang L, Grottkau B, He Z, Ye C. Three dimensional printing technology and materials for treatment of elbow fractures. Int Orthop 2017;41:2381–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3627-7.
14. Iobst CA. New Technologies in Pediatric Deformity Correction. Orthop Clin North Am 2019;50:77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2018.08.003.
15. Holt AM, Starosolski Z, Kan JH, Rosenfeld SB. Rapid Prototyping 3D Model in Treatment of Pediatric Hip Dysplasia: A Case Report. Iowa Orthop J 2017;37:157–62.
16. Cherkasskiy L, Caffrey JP, Szewczyk AF, et al. Patient-specific 3D models aid planning for triplane proximal femoral osteotomy in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Child Orthop 2017;11:147–53. https://doi.org/10.1302/1863-2548-11-170277.
17. Sakai T, Tezuka F, Abe M, et al. Pediatric Patient with Incidental Os Odontoideum Safely Treated with Posterior Fixation Using Rod-Hook System and Preoperative Planning Using 3D Printer: A Case Report. J Neurol Surg Part Cent Eur Neurosurg 2017;78:306–9. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1584211.
18. Gadiya A, Shah K, Nagad P, Nene A. A Technical Note on Making Patient-Specific Pedicle Screw Templates for Revision Pediatric Kyphoscoliosis Surgery with Sublaminar Wires In Situ. J Orthop Case Rep 2019;9:82–4. https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.1320.
19. Salazar D, Huff TJ, Cramer J, Wong L, Linke G, Zuniga J. Use of a three-dimensional printed anatomical model for tumor management in a pediatric patient. SAGE Open Med Case Rep 2020;8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050313X20927600.
20. Karlin L, Weinstock P, Hedequist D, Prabhu SP. The surgical treatment of spinal deformity in children with myelomeningocele: the role of personalized three-dimensional printed models. J Pediatr Orthop Part B 2017;26:375–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000000411.

Most read articles by the same author(s)