Epidemiology of Tick-borne encephalitis in North-Eastern Italy (2017-2020): international insights from national notification reports

Main Article Content

Matteo Riccò http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6525-2159

Keywords

Italy, epidemiology, tick-borne encephalitis, tick-borne virus

Abstract

Sir,


Italy is usually considered as a low-risk country for Tick Borne Encephalitis (TBE), a potentially severe disorder caused by the flavivirus TBE virus (TBEV) [1,2]. Endemicity for TBEV is historically restricted to the North-Eastern Regions of “Triveneto” (i.e. autonomous provinces of Trento [APT] and Bolzano [APB], and the regions of Veneto, and Friuli-Venezia-Giulia; total area 39,875.87 km2; total population 7,163,418 inhabitants according to 2020 census), with a notification rate estimated in 0.38 cases per 100,000 during the time period 2000-2013 [1,3].


 


Even though national estimates are substantially below the cut-off value of 5 cases per 100,000 that recommend active vaccination policies for the general population [1,2,4], overall incidence is on the rise, mirroring the pan-European trend [5,6]. The causes reasonably include a mixture of environmental (e.g. climate changes) and behavioral factors that eventually increase the likelihood of human interactions with a competent vector (i.e. Ixodes spp) from areas where the pathogen highly circulating in appropriate hosts (i.e. rodents and ungulates) [3,4].


 


In this regard, we think that a retrospective analysis of annual reports from Italian National Health Institute (Istituto Superiore di Sanità, or ISS; https://www.epicentro.iss.it/arbovirosi/bollettini) [7] may shed some insights on the ongoing epidemiology of TBEV in Italy.


 


According to official figures, a total of 103 Italian cases occurred between 2017 and 2020, 100 of them in the Triveneto, with a pooled incidence rate (IR) of 0.35 per 100,000 [95%CI 0.28-0.42] (Figure 1). Annual estimates peaked in 2018 (0.54 per 100,000 [95%CI 0.39-0.74]), but overall figures remain quite low, in particular when compared to nearby countries likewise Austria (399 cases, mean IR 1.51 per 100,000) or Slovenia (366 cases, mean IR 4.61 per 100,000), and Switzerland (377 cases reported in 2018 alone; crude IR 4.41 per 100,000) [8]. However, such figures require some comments.


 


Firstly, ISS bulletins report only on TBE cases characterized by meningitis and/or encephalitis, similarly to the figures reported by Austria and Slovenia, while Switzerland authorities usually report on all newly diagnosed infections, irrespective of complained symptoms [7,8]. In facts, only 20% to 30% of all TBEV infections usually evolve in CNS involvement [1,2].


Second, the mandatory reporting systems reportedly failed to recall a large share of patients (up to 45%) if hospital discharge data were not appropriately integrated [2]. In other words, it is reasonable that Italian figures may largely underestimate actual epidemiology of TBEV, particularly for the endemic areas of Triveneto [1,2]. Supposing a dropout rate of 45%, and assuming that TBE cases with CNS impairment would represent no more than 30% of actual TBEV infections, actual Italian burden between 2017 and 2020 may be estimated to 152 cases/year (95%CI 59.7-243.3) for Triveneto alone, with an IR equals to 2.8 per 100,000, i.e. an estimate approximating aforementioned figures for Switzerland in 2018.


 


Third, pooled Italian figures mask something alike “a tale of two stories”. On the one hand, during the time period 2018 – 2020, Veneto, Friuli-Venezia-Giulia, and APB, exhibited incidence rates were alike the overall estimates for 2000 – 2013 (Figure 1). For example, IR for Friuli-Venezia-Giulia was 0.14 per 100,000 [95%CI 0.04-0.32], with a corresponding incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.44 [95%CI 0.19-1.01] compared to overall figures for 2000-2013. On the other hand, despite the active vaccination campaigns put in place by the local Authorities [4], estimates for the APT peaked to 1.96 cases per 100,000 [95%CI 1.34-2.77], with an IRR equals to 5.63 [95% 4.02-7.76].


As available evidence suggests that the majority of APT cases are clustered in some foci of hyperendemicity for TBEV-infected ticks [1,9], a possible explanation for these results may be found through the “one health approach”, i.e. by summarizing environmental data with evidence from human and veterinary medicine. In facts, the mountainous territories of the APT, have become a popular holiday destination for Italian and foreigner tourists [4], but mostly represent appropriate habitats for both tick vectors and usual hosts for TBEV, and particularly ungulates [9]. Interestingly, their number remained substantially stable in the APT until the 2005, roughly doubling in the following decade [10]. That lead to increasingly interactions between humans and wild animals, and such a trend was somewhat mirrored by the increasing occurrence of TBEV infections [1,3,4,9].


 


Finally, the TBEV strain isolated in APT is only distantly related to the those from other areas of Triveneto, rather belonging to the TBEV-Eu subtype that is highly circulating in Central Europe since 2012 [9]. TBEV-Eu has been identified in migratory birds, including those hosted on their route by the forests of APT. If the migratory birds are the key player in the spreading of TBEV-Eu across Europe, their migration could in turn explain the heterogeneity of APT compared not only to bordering countries of Austria and Slovenia, but also to the nearby APB. In turn, such features suggest that TBEV-Eu could rapidly spread even in areas not usually associated with TBEV endemicity, not only in Italy but also in Southern Europe.


 


Therefore, Italian data stress the potentially extensive underestimation for TBEV infections, at least in North-Eastern region, and the significance of TBEV-Eu strain in the epidemiology of TBE emphasize the importance for appropriate surveillance of TBE cases, also in terms of genetic analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 50 |

References

[1] Rezza G, Farchi F, Pezzotti P, Ruscio M, lo Presti A, Ciccozzi M, et al. Tick-borne encephalitis in North-East Italy: A 14-year retrospective study, January 2000 to December 2013. Eurosurveillance 2015;20. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2015.20.40.30034.
[2] Cocchio S, Bertoncello C, Napoletano G, Claus M, Furlan P, Fonzo M, et al. Do We Know the True Burden of Tick-Borne Encephalitis? A Cross-Sectional Study. Neuroepidemiology 2019. https://doi.org/10.1159/000503236.
[3] Riccò M, Gualerzi G, Ranzieri S, Ferraro P, Bragazzi NL. Knowledge, attitudes, practices (KAP) of Italian occupational physicians towards tick borne encephalitis. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 2020;5. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed5030117.
[4] Riccò M, Bragazzi NL, Vezzosi L, Balzarini F, Colucci ME, Veronesi L. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices on Tick-Borne Human Diseases and Tick-Borne Encephalitis Vaccine among Farmers from North-Eastern Italy (2017). Journal of Agromedicine 2020;25. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2019.1659204.
[5] Erber W, Schmitt HJ. Self-reported tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccination coverage in Europe: Results from a cross-sectional study. Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases 2018;9:768–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.02.007.
[6] Vonesch N, Binazzi A, Bonafede M, Melis P, Ruggieri A, Iavicoli S, et al. Emerging zoonotic viral infections of occupational health importance. Pathogens and Disease 2019;77:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/femspd/ftz018.
[7] del Manso M, Caporali M, Bella A, Venturi G, di Luca M, Parodi P, et al. Arbovirosi in Italia - Tbe N. 2 - Ottobre 2020. Rome: 2020.
[8] ECDC. Epidemiological situation of tick-borne encephalitis in the European Union and European Free Trade Association countries. 2012.
[9] Alfano N, Tagliapietra V, Rosso F, Ziegler U, Arnoldi D, Rizzoli A. Tick-borne encephalitis foci in northeast Italy revealed by combined virus detection in ticks, serosurvey on goats and human cases. Emerging Microbes and Infections 2020;9:474–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1730246.
[10] Carnevali L, Pedrotti L, Riga F, Toso S. Banca Dati Ungulati: Status, distribuzione, consistenza, gestione e prelievo venatorio delle popolazioni di Ungulati in Italia. Rapporto 2001-2005. Biol Cons Fauna 2009;117:77–92.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>