Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) implementation among nursing students: Italian validation of S-EBPQ
Keywords:
Evidence-based Practice, nursing student, questionnaire, ItalyAbstract
Background and aim: The use of Evidence-Based Practices in nursing has become essential for providing effective, safe, and personalized care. Nurses must learn the skill to use Evidence-Based Practice in universities, which represents the core of nursing education. Therefore, it appears necessary to evaluate students’ learning after the training period and to identify the strengths and obstacles to the implementation of Evidence-Based Practice put to use. This study aims to validate the Italian version of the Student Evidence Based Practice Questionnaire. Methods: The questionnaire was translated into Italian according to the World Health Organization guidelines. Content validation was carried out. A study was conducted on a sample of 119 students. The questionnaire was administered at four different times during the training period. The data were evaluated using the ANOVA test for repeated measures, Cronbach’s Alpha, and Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient. Results: The Content Validity Index demonstrated values greater than 0.8 in all items and overall. Cronbach’s Alpha showed values above 0.90 in the entire questionnaire. There was no correlation between the sex or age of the students and the score in the questionnaire. The mean scores gradually increased over the four administrations. Conclusions: The Student Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire in the Italian version has proven to be a valid tool for assessing students’ approach to Evidence-Based Practice.
References
FNOPI. Il Codice deontologico delle professioni infermieristiche. Approvato dal Comitato centrale della Federazione e dal Consiglio nazionale degli Ordini delle Professioni infermieristiche riuniti a Roma nella seduta del 12 e 13 aprile 2019. available at: https://www.fnopi.it/norme-e-codici/deontologia/#1571846131365-8f70c763-6358 (accessed 19 decembrer 2020)
King R, Taylor B, Talpur A, Jackson C, Manley k, Ashby N, Tod A, et al. Factors that optimise the impact of continuing professional development in nursing: A rapid evidence review. Nurse Educ Today. 2020; 104652. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104652.
Emanuel V, Day K, Diegnan L, Pryce-Miller M. Developing evidence-based practice among students. Nurs Times. 2011;107(49-50):21-3.
Robinson KA, Brunnhuber K, Ciliska D, Juhl CB, Christensen R, Lund H. Evidence-Based Research Network. What evidence-based research is and why is it important? J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;23:S0895-4356(20)31095-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.020.
Ramacciati N. Health Technology Assessment in nursing: a literature review. Int Nurs Rev. 2013;60(1):23-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2012.01038.x.
Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312:71-72.
McKinney I, DelloStritto RA, Branham S. Nurses’ Use of Evidence-Based Practice at Point of Care: A Literature Review. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2019;42(3):256-264. doi: 10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000266.
Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E, Stillwell SB, Williamson KM. Evidence-based practice: step by step: the seven steps of evidence-based practice. Am J Nurs. 2010;110(1):51-3. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000366056.06605.d2.
Reale MC, Riche DM, Witt BA, Baker WL, Peeters MJ. Development of critical thinking in health professions education: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018;10(7):826-833. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.04.019.
Belowska J, Panczyk M, Zarzeka A, Iwanow L, Cieslak I, Gotlib J. Promoting evidence-based practice - perceived knowledge, behaviours and attitudes of Polish nurses: a cross-sectional validation study. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020;26(2):397-405. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2018.1489993.
Albarqouni L, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P. Evidence-based practice educational intervention studies: a systematic review of what is taught and how it is measured. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1284-1
Longo D, Ramacciati N. Gli strumenti per valutare la pratica basata sulle prove di efficacia tra gli studenti in infermieristica: una revisione narrativa. Scenario. 2021;38(1):22-30
Ruzafa-Martinez M, Lopez-Iborra L, Moreno-Casbas T, Madrigal-Torres M. Development and validation of the competence in evidence based practice questionnaire (EBP-COQ) among nursing students. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:19. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-19.
Upton P, Scurlock-Evans L, Upton D. Development of the Student Evidence-based Practice Questionnaire (S-EBPQ). Nurse Educ Today. 2016;37:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.11.010.
Finotto S, Garofalo E. Validazione per il contesto italiano dell’Evidence Based Practice Evaluation Competence Questionnaire (EBP-COQ) [Italian Validation of Evidence Based Practice Evaluation Competence Questionnaire (EBP-COQ)]. Prof Inferm. 2020;73(2):98-105. Italian. doi: 10.7429/pi.2020.732098.
Upton D, Upton P. Development of an evidence-based practice questionnaire for nurses. J Adv Nurs. 2006 Feb;53(4):454-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03739.x.
World Health Organization (WHO) (2016) Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. Available at: http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/ (accessed 30 October 2016).
Rutherford-Hemming T. Determining Content Validity and Reporting a Content Validity Index for Simulation Scenarios. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2015;36(6):389-393. doi: 10.5480/15-1640.
Yusoff MSB. ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal. 2019;11(2):49–54. doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6
Almanasreh E, Moles R, Chen TF. Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019;15(2):214-221. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066.
Schiling LS., Dixon JK., Knafl KA., Grey M, Ives B, Lynn MR. Determining Content Validity of a Self-Report Instrument for Adolescent Using a Heterogeneous Expert Panel. Nursing Research. 2007;56(5):361-366. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000289505.30037.91
Park E, Cho M, Ki C-S. Correct Use of Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance. Korean J Lab Med. 2009;29:1-9 doi: 10.3343/kjlm.2009.29.1.1
Mishra P, Singh U, Pandey CM, Mishra P, Pandey G. Application of Student’s t-test, Analysis of Variance, and Covariance. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia. 2019;22:407-411. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_94_19
Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education. 2011;2:53-55. doi:10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
Zhang YP, Liu WH, Yan YT, Zhang Y, Wei HH, Porr C. Developing Student Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (S-EBPQ) for undergraduate nursing students: Reliability and validity of a Chinese adaptation. J Eval Clin Pract. 2019;25(4):536-542. doi: 10.1111/jep.12897.
Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an Acceptable Indicator of Content Validity? Appraisal and Recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health. 2007;30:459-467. doi: 10.1002/nur.20199
Leach MJ, Hofmeyer A, Bodridge A. The impact of research education on student nurse attitude, skill and uptake of evidence-based practice: a descriptive longitudinal survey. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2015;25:194-203
Ruzafa-Martinez M, Lopez-Iborra L, Barranco DA, Ramos-Morcillo AJ. Effectiveness of an evidence-based practice (EBP) course on the EBP competence of undergraduate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today. 2016;38:82-87
Rojjanasrirat W, Rice J. Evidence-based practice knowledge, attitudes, and practice of online graduate nursing students. Nurse Education Today. 2017;53:48-53
Mena-Tudela D, González-Chorda VM, Cervera-Gash A, Marcia-Soler ML, Orts-Cortes MJ. Effectiveness of an Evidence-Based Practice educational intervention with second-year nursing students. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem. 2018;26:e3026
Cosme S, Milner KA, Wonder A. Benchmarking of Prelicensure Nursing Students’ Evidence-Based Practice Knowledge. Nurse Educator. 2018;43(1):50-53
Zeleniková R, Beach M, Ren D, Wolff E, Sherwood PR. Graduate nursing students’ evaluation of EBP curses: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Education Today. 2014;35:265-270
Brown CE, Wickline MA, Glaser D. Predictors of knowledge, attitude, use and future use of evidence-based practice among baccalaureate nursing students at two universities. Nurse Education Today. 2010;30:1-33
Zeleniková R, Gurkavá E, Ziaková K, Tomagová M, Jarosová D, Fineout-Overholt E. Psychometric Properties of the Slovak and Czech Version of the Evidence-Based Practice Belief and Implementation Scales. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 2016;13(2):139-152
Cardoso D, Santos E, Cardoso ML, Oliveira CR, Rodrigues MA, Apόstolo J. Instruments for measuring undergraduate nursing students’ knowledge, attitudes and skills in evidence-based practice: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017;15(8):1979-1986. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003218.
Scurlock-Evans L, Upton P, Rouse J, Upton D. To embed or not to embed? A longitudinal study exploring the impact of curriculum design on the evidence-based practice profiles of UK pre-registration nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;58:12-18. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.07.011.
Beccaria L, Beccaria G, McCosker C. A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Student Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (S-EBPQ) in an Australian sample. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;62:69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.010.
Park JE, Hwang JI. Psychometric Evaluation of the Korean Version of the Student Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (S-EBPQ). Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2020, 20:S1976-1317(20)30092-X. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2020.10.003.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Donato Longo, Alessio Gili, Nicola Ramacciati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.