Publication productivity of Allied Health Professions in an Italian Local Health Authority: prevalence and bibliometric analysis: Publication productivity of AHPs in Italy

Matteo Paci; Lisa Mazzini; Stefania Vezzosi; Mauro Margheri; Sandra Moretti

doi:10.23750/abm.v92iS2.11276

Publication productivity of Allied Health Professions in an Italian Local Health Authority: prevalence and bibliometric analysis

Publication productivity of AHPs in Italy

Authors

Matteo Paci a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:71:"Unit of Functional Rehabilitation, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence";}
Lisa Mazzini Graduate Course in Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Florence, Italy
Stefania Vezzosi Unit of Dietetics, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
Mauro Margheri Unit of Environment and Workplace Prevention, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
Sandra Moretti Unit of Functional Rehabilitation, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92iS2.11276

Keywords:

Allied Health, Bibliometrics, Authorship, Scientific output indicators

Abstract

Background and aim of the work: Despite Allied Health Professions (AHPs) represent a substantial part of workforce within the health system and they might give a relevant contribution to research, literature on publication productivity of AHPs working in non-research/academic institutions is scarce. The aim of this investigation was to provide point prevalence of AHPs working in a non- research/academic setting who have written at least one article published in indexed journals, in order to describe their scientific productivity.

Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out of AHPs working in large Local Health Authority in Italy, who published in journals indexed in Scopus and/or PubMed. H-index, publications and citations number, journal name, publication year, and journal Impact Factor were extracted.

Results: Fifty-two AHP workers were identified as authors, having published 105 articles between 1993 and 2019. The number of papers increased over the years (p < .001). Published papers in journals with Impact Factor were 67.6% (n = 71) of the total, with a median Impact Factor = 2.676 (range = 0.583 – 59.102). The median number of citations was 4 (range = 0 – 99). The prevalence among units ranged from 0.8% to 5.0%, 2.9% in the whole department. There were not significant differences in number of articles (p = .138), citations received (p = .337), and H-Index (p = .661) among units.

Conclusions: In the Local Health Authority under investigation, publication productivity of AHPs workers was found to be low, although it is increasing over time, with no significant differences among units. Further investigations should be carried out to link these results with authors’ information and organizational characteristics to study the relationship between authors’ profiles and publication productivity.

References

Arena RA, Goldberg LR, Ingersoll CD, Larsen DS, Shelledy D. Research in the Allied Health Professions: Why Fund It? A Report of the ASAHP Research Committee. J Allied Health 2011;40:161-166.

Available at: http://www.salute.gov.it. Accessed 20 September 2020.

Harris J, Grafton K, Cooke J. Developing a consolidated research framework for clinical allied health professionals practising in the UK. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):852.

Paci M, Plebani G. Scientific publication productivity of Italian physiotherapists. It J Physiother. 2013;3:170–3.

Vercelli S, Ravizzotti E, Paci M. Are they publishing? A descriptive cross-sectional profile and bibliometric analysis of the journal publication productivity of Italian physiotherapists. Arch Physiother 2018; 8, 1.

Gatti R, Paci M, Vercelli S, Baccini M. Teaching how to improve activities and participation of elderly subjects: the carelessness of the Italian Academia shown by the national qualification for physiotherapists. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2015;27(2):243-4.

Gatti R, Paci M, Vercelli S, Baccini M. Has the Italian academia missed an opportunity? Phys Ther. 2014;94(9):1358-60.

Demo DH, Fry D, Devine N, Butler A. A Call for Action: Advocating for Increased Funding for the Allied Health Professions: ASAHP Leadership Development Program. J Allied Health. 2015;44(1):57-62.

Available at: https://www.uslcentro.toscana.it/index.php/azienda. Accessed 20 September 2020.

Seglen PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ. 1997;314:498–502.

Pendlebury DA. The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2009;57:1–11.

Paci M, Landi N, Briganti G, Lombardi B. Factors associated with citation rate of randomised controlled trials in physiotherapy. Arch Physiother. 2015;5:9.

Wenke R, Weir KA, Noble C, Mahoney J, Mickan S. Not enough time for research? Use of supported funding to promote allied health research activity. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018;11:269-277.

Slade SC, Philip K, Morris ME. Frameworks for embedding a research culture in allied health practice: a rapid review. Health Res Policy Sys 2018; 16, 29.

Harding K, Lynch L, Porter J. Taylor NF. Organisational benefits of a strong research culture in a health service: a systematic review. Aust Health Rev. 2017;41:45–53.

Pager S, Holden L, Golenko X. Motivators, enablers, and barriers to building allied health research capacity. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2012;5:53–9.

Harvey D, Plummer D, Nielsen I, Adams R, Pain T. Becoming a clinician researcher in allied health. Aust Health Rev 2016; 40:562-569.

Taylor NF, Porter J, Lynch L, Home-Thompson A, Wallis J, Kerridge G, Harding KE, Wilby A, Joy A, Kaminski M, Sheats J, Wilson E. Evaluating the Introduction of an Allied Health Clinical Research Office at a Health Service: Effects on Research Participation, Interest, and Experience of Allied Health Professionals. J Allied Health 2019; 48:46–53.