Information obligation in surgery

Main Article Content

natale mario di luca
Alessandro del Rio


: Doctor-patent relationship, Duty to inform, Surgical treatments


The following article aims to clarify the guidelines needed for the gaining of informed consent in surgery treatments.  Legal dispositions in the provisions of law n. 219/2017, written according to the regulatory mechanism uphold by the Italian Supreme Court and medical code of practice have been properly analyzed in order answer the questions unanswered by the law. Who is supposed to inform the patient? About which risks?  Does the patient’s characteristics affect information obligation? Is necessary to add more information than those required by the law? How do emergency and urgency affect information obligation? Can the patient give consent in advance to an additional operation during the undergoing surgery, if needed?

The answers provided by the law and by the Italian Supreme Court picture a state of obligation, where the single physician risks to encounter several responsibilities.

It’s important to face this problem inside sanitary facilities, creating a suitable informed consent form and planning surgeries to allow the usage of personal data according to the patient’s need


Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 32 |


1. Frati P, Frati G, Gulino M, Montanari Vergallo G, di Luca A, Fineschi V. Stem cell therapy: from evidence-based medicine to emotion-based medicine? The long Italian way for a scientific regulation. Stem Cell Res Ther 2013; 4(5): 122-133.
2. Conti AA. The birth and evolution of the Ministry of Health and of the National Health Service in Italy. Acta Biomed 2015; 86(1): 111-112.
3. Art. 3 Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union,
4. European Court of Human Rights, Third Section, Csoma v. Romania, 13 January 2013 (Application no. 8759/05),{%22itemid%22:[%22001-115862%22]}.
5. Art. 5 Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine,
6. Montanari Vergallo G, Rinaldi R, Bersani G, Marinelli E. Medico-legal notes for a new set of standards in the assessment of penal liability in psychiatry. Riv Psichiatr 2017;52(1):16-23.
7. Frati P, Fineschi V, Gulino M, Montanari Vergallo G, Di Luca NM, Turillazzi E. Ethical and legal implications of elective ventilation and organ transplantation: "medicalization" of dying versus medical mission. Biomed Res Int 2014:973758.
8. Conti AA. From informed consent to informed dissent in health care: historical evolution in the twentieth century. Acta Biomed 2017; 88(2): 201-203.
9. Montanari Vergallo G, Spagnolo AG. Informed Consent and Advance Care Directives: Cornerstones and Outstanding Issues in the Newly Enacted Italian Legislation. Linacre Quarterly 2019; 86(2-3): 188-197.
10. Robertson L. Contemporary interpretation of informed consent: autonomy and paternalism. Br J Hosp Med 2016;77(6):358‐361.
11. Cecchi R, Masotti V, Meo AU, Rinaldi R. The law on artificial insemination: an italian anomaly. Acta Biomed 2017; 88(4): 403-408.
12. Legge 2 dicembre 2017, n. 219, Norme in materia di consenso informato e di disposizioni anticipate di trattamento,
13. Del Rio A, Rinaldi R, Napoletano S, di Luca NM. Cosmetic surgery for children and adolescents. Deontological and bioethical remarks. Clin Ter 2017;168(6):e415-e420.
14. Italian Supreme Court, Sec. III, 15 January 1997, n. 364.
15. Italian Supreme Court, Sec. III, 8 April 1997, n. 3046.
16. Italian Supreme Court, Sec. III, 14 March 2006, n. 5444.
17. Todd NV, Birch NC. Informed consent in spinal surgery. Bone Joint J. 2019;101-B(4):355‐360.
18. Montanari Vergallo G, Ralli M, di Luca A, di Luca NM. Is the team leading surgeon criminally liable for his collaborators’ errors? Judges confirm responsibility and condemn an otorhinolaryngologist. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2018; 38(3): 273-276.
19. Martelli A. Costs optimization in anaesthesia. Acta Biomed 2015; 86(1): 38-44;
20. Tierney S, Perlas A. Informed consent for regional anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018;31(5):614‐621.
21. Court of Genova, Sec. II, 10 January 2006
22. Italian Supreme Court, Sec. III 20 May 2016, n. 10414.
23. Foy MA. Informed consent: where are we in 2015?. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B(9):1159‐1161.
24. Italian Supreme Court, Sec. III, 19 September 2014, n. 19731.
25. Italian Supreme Court, Sec. IV, 17 January 2007, n. 1025.
26. Italian Supreme Court, Sec. III, 11 November 2019, n. 28985.
27. Italian Supreme Court, Sec. III, 4 February 2016, n. 2177.
28. Cocanour CS. Informed consent-It's more than a signature on a piece of paper. Am J Surg. 2017;214(6):993-997.
29. Introna F. Consenso informato o rifiuto ragionato? L’informazione deve essere sommaria o dettagliata?, Riv. It. Med. Leg. 1998; 20: 821-830.
30. Italian Supreme Court, Sec. III, 11 November 2019, n. 28985.
31. Hogan KJ, Bratzke LC, Hogan KL. Informed Consent and Cognitive Dysfunction After Noncardiac Surgery in the Elderly. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(2):629-631.
32. Italian Supreme Court, Sec. III, 30 July 2004, n. 14638.
33. Italian Supreme Court, Sec. III, 4 February 2016, n. 2177.
34. Conti AA. An analysis of the changes in communication techniques in the Italian Codes of Medical Deontology. Acta Biomed 2017; 88(1): 33-38.
35. Appellate Court of Rome, 24 January 2006.
36. Patuzzo S, De Stefano F, Ciliberti R. The Italian Code of Medical Deontology. Historical, ethical and legal issues. Acta Biomed 2017; 89(2): 157-164.
37. Montanari Vergallo G, Marinelli E, di Luca NM, Cisale GY, Zaami S. Medico-legal issues of research on Alzheimer’s parients. Medicine and Law 2018; 37(3): 533-550.
38. Anastasia A, Colletti C, Cuoco V, Quartini A, Urso S, Rinaldi R, Bersani G.
Demographic variables, clinical aspects, and medicolegal implications in a population of patients with adjustment disorder. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016; 12:737-743.
39. Rinaldi R., Montanari Vergallo G. Bersani G. Caradonna L. Decision making in mild cognitive impairment: medicolegal implications Minerva Psichiatrica 2020;61(2):35-46.
40. Fields LM, Calvert JD. Informed consent procedures with cognitively impaired patients: A review of ethics and best practices. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2015;69(8):462‐471.
41. Costa ML, Tutton E, Achten J, Grant R, Slowther AM. Informed consent in the context of research involving acute injuries and emergencies. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(2):147‐150.
42. Gristina GR. Considerazioni in merito ai commi 5, 6 e 7 dell’articolo 1 della legge sul consenso in-formato e sulle disposizioni anticipate di trattamento. Biolaw Journal 2018; 5(1), 28-30,
43. Busardó, FP, Gulino M, di Luca NM, Montanari Vergallo G, Pacchiarotti A, Frati P. Not only a clinical nightmare: Amniotic fluid embolism in court. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology 2013; 14(14): 1195-1200.
44. Malvasi A, Zaami S, Tinelli A, Trojano G, Montanari Vergallo G, Marinelli E. Kristeller maneuvers or fundal pressure and maternal/neonatal morbidity: obstetric and judicial literature review. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2019; 32(15): 2598-2607.
45. Montanari Vergallo G, Busardò FP, Berretta P, Marinelli E, Zaami S. Advance Healthcare Directives: Moving Towards a Universally Recognized Right. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2018;22(10):2915-2916.
46. Montanari Vergallo G. Advance Healthcare Directives: Binding or Informational Value? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2020; 29(1): 98-109.
47. di Luca A, Del Rion A, Bosco M, di Luca NM. Law on Advance Health Care Directives: A Medical Perspective. Clin Ter 2018;169(2):e77-e81.
48. Montanari Vergallo G, Zaami S. Guidelines and best practices: Remarks on the Gelli-Bianco law. Clin Ter 2018; 169(2) e82-e85.
49. Mazzariol B, Karaboue M, di Luca A, di Luca NM. Guidelines, good practices and best clinical health practices: Valuable guidance for physicians and judges? Clin Ter 2018, 169(6): e292-e296.