Ethical implications of genetic susceptibility testing: NeuroGenEthics and the “Angelina Jolie effect”
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
An increasing interest in genetics of aggressive behavior has developed in literature over time and specifically regarding genes involved in dopaminergic and serotonergic systems, sex steroids and glucocorticoids. The same could be said for mood and anxiety disorders, psychosis, schizophrenia syndromes and antisocial and criminal behavior. This has led to the idea that it was possible to make genetic tests applicable in psychiatry with the ability to define a risk profile. However, the results obtained to date are mostly contradictory, un-replicable and lack standardized protocols and the legal frames are not clear. The results found were that there wasn’t a simple mendelian transmission or connection of a few genes. Today, we have to overcome the genetic determinism and generalize it in an interdisciplinary perspective without neglecting the ethical, legal and social issues and without slipping into a sort of “Angelina Jolie effect”.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
How to Cite
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.