“Capta est ne malitia mutaret intelletum eius...” Study on a natural mummy from an underground cemetery (18-19th century)

Main Article Content

Roberta Fusco https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5443-8364
Arianna Vanni
Chiara Tesi
Carmelo Messina


Hypogeal cemetery, Paleoradiology, Paleopathology, Natural mummies


Here we present the paleopathological analysis that were recently conducted on one of the mummies present in the hypogeal cemetery of Santa Maria Maggiore in Vercelli, belonging, according to the writings above the tomb, to a young girl. Among the analysis carried out, the anthropological ones were able to confirm the young age of the subject, while the CT ones confirm the natural mummification and showed the presence of Harris lines, leading to the hypothesis that this girl was subjected to alternating periods of stress.  Although it is not possible to reach an unequivocal conclusion on the stress suffered by the young woman, the data collected will allow us, first of all, to be able to continue archival research to identify her and her family, and then they will be useful for a larger study that will cover all the skeletal remains present in the cemetery.As our research advances, we anticipate unveiling deeper layers of understanding that contribute to the overarching narrative of this intriguing historical context.

Abstract 25 | PDF Downloads 22


1. Destefanis E, Garanzini F, Licata M. L’insula episcopalis di Vercelli tra medioevo ed età moderna: riflessioni su topografia, strutture materiali e dati bioarcheologici. In: M. Milanese, editor. Atti del IX Congresso Nazionale di Archeologia Medievale. Sesto fiorentino; 2022. pp. 426–30.
2. Tibaldeschi G. La Chiesa di S. Maria Maggiore di Vercelli e l’Assunzione di Paolo Borroni. In “Bollettino Storico Vercellese”, n° 2. Vercelli; 1996. pp. 131–50.
3. Fusco R, Larentis O, Cermesoni B, Ravagnan A, Tesi C. The “Mummy of Erba”: A study proposal for the analysis of a mummified Egyptian specimen. Medicina Historica 2018; 2(3):163–5.
4. Fusco R., et al. “Mummies outside their closets”. Paleoradiological investigation of Egyptian mummified remains. Forensic Imaging 2020; 22: 200397.
5. Licata M, Tosi A, Larentis O, Rossetti C, Lorio S, Pinto A. Radiology of Mummies. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2019; 40(1): 5–11.
6. Iscan MY, Kennedy KAR. Reconstruction of Life from the Skeleton. New York: Wiley; 1989.
7. Ubelaker DH. Human Skeletal Remains: Excavation, Analysis, Interpretation. Washington D.C.: Taraxacum; 1989.
8. Licata M, Tosi A, Ciliberti R, Badino P, Pinto A. Role of Radiology in the Assessment of Skeletons from Archeological Sites. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI 2019; 40(1): 12–17.
9. Nuorteva P. Sarcosaprophagous insects as forensic indicators. In: Tedeschi GC, Eckert WG, Tedeschi LG, editors. Forensic Medicine, a Study in Trauma and Environmental Hazards. Vol. 2, Physical trauma. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1977. pp. 1072–95.
10. Aufderheide AC, Rodríguez-Martín C. The Cambridge encyclopedia of human paleopathology. Cambridge University Press; 2014.
11. Fornaciari G, Giuffra V. Lezioni di paleopatologia. Genova: ECIG; 2009.
12. Borgognini Tarli S, Pacciani E. I resti umani nello scavo archeologico. Roma: Bulzoni Editore; 1993.
13. Tesi C, et al. Defects related early childhood caries as hints of possible maternal–fetal health issues: Evidence from medieval northern Italy. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 2023; 33(2): 251–70.
14. Licata M., Larentis O, Tesi C, Fusco R, Ciliberti R, Tourism in the Time of Coronavirus. Fruition of the ‘minor Heritage’ through the Development of Bioarchaeological Sites a Proposal. Heritage. 4, no. 2 (2021): 759–774.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>