Breast cancer in the 17th century: the cases of the wives of Luis Guillermo de Moncada (1614-1672)
Main Article Content
Keywords
Paleo-oncology, breast cancer, paleopathology, 17th century medicine, Moncada
Abstract
The human remains of nobles housed in the Neapolitan Basilica of Saint Domenico Maggiore (15-17th centuries) are an important series with regard to paleo-oncology, since three out of five cases of soft tissue tumours known in paleopathology worldwide are documented in this Italian series. Among the bodies of Saint Domenico Maggiore there are the first and the second wife of the Prince Luis Guillermo de Moncada (1614-1672): Maria Afán de Ribera (ca1615-1639) and Catalina Moncada de Castro (1611-1659). Both women died of breast cancer, as shown by the archival sources. The bodies of the two women are skeletonized and the radiological analysis allowed us to identify some focal osteolytic lesions of neoplastic origin. These cases constitute the first examples of breast cancer diagnoses in ancient human remains supported by the integration of archival sources and paleopathological investigations.
These two new cases must be added to the three previously known malignant tumours from San Domenico Maggiore. In this Neapolitan series, out of a total of eighteen adult individuals aged 25-71 years, five (28%) were affected by cancer. Despite the small sample size, this prevalence is surprisingly comparable to that of the contemporary Western world.
References
2. Hunt KJ, Roberts C, Kirkpatrick C. Taking stock: A systematic review of archaeological evidence of cancers in human and early hominin remains. Intern J of Paleopathol 2018; 21:12-26.
3. Marques C, Roberts C, Matos VMJ, Buikstra JE. Cancers as rare diseases: Terminological, theoretical, and methodological biases. Int J Paleopathol. 2021; 32:111–122.
4. Waldron T. What was the prevalence of malignant disease in the past? Int J Osteoarcheol 1996; 6(5):463–470.
5. David AR, Zimmerman MR. Cancer: an old disease, a new disease or something in between? Nat Rev Cancer 2010; 10(10):728–733.
6. Kirkpatrick CL, Campbell RA, Hunt KJ. Paleo-oncology: Taking stock and moving forward. Intern J of Paleopathol 2018; 21:3–11.
7. Hajdu SI. A Note From History: Landmarks in History of Cancer, Part 1. Cancer 2011; 117(5):1097–1102.
8. Aufderheide AC, Rodriguez-Martin C. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Paleopathology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
9. Marques C. Tumors of Bone. In: Buikstra JE (Ed) Ortner's Identification of Pathological Conditions in Human Skeletal Remains 3rd edn. Academic Press; 2019.
10. Gaeta R, Giuffra V, Fornaciari G. Cancer in the Renaissance court of Naples. Lancet Oncol 2017;18(8): e432.
11. Fornaciari G. Histology of ancient soft tissue tumors: a review. Intern J of Paleopathol 2018; 21:64–76.
12. Fornaciari A, Gaeta R, Chericoni S. et al. Cancer and therapy in the 16th century: the unique case of adenocarcinoma in Luigi Carafa, prince of Stigliano (1511-76). Lancet Oncol 2019; 20(12):1641–1642.
13. Phenice W. A newly developed visual method of sexing the os pubis. Am J Bio Anthropol. 1969; 30(2): 297–301.
14. Bruzek J. A method for visual determination of sex, using the human hip bone. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2002; 117(2):157–68.
15. Klales AR, Ousley SD, Vollner JM. A revised method of sexing the human innominate using Phenice's nonmetric traits and statistical methods. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2012; 149(1):104–14.
16. Nikita E. Osteoarchaeology: A guide to the macroscopic study of human skeletal remains. London: Academic Press; 2017.
17. Novotony V, Iscan M Y, Loth S R. Morphologic and osteometric assessment of age, sex and race from the skull. In: Iscan M Y and Helmer (Eds.) Forensic analysis of the skull. New York: Willy Liss; 1993:71–88.
18. Williams BA, Rogers T. Evaluating the accuracy and precision of cranial morphological traits for sex determination. J Forensic Sci. 2006; 51(4):729–35.
19. Walker PL. Sexing skulls using discriminant function analysis of visually assessed traits. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2008; 136(1):39–50.
20. Nikita E. Age-associated variations and sexual dimorphism in adult cranial morphology: implications in anthropological studies. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 2014; 24(5):557–569;
21. Sauter MR, Privat F. Une nouvelle méthode de détermination sexuelle de l'os coxal : l'indice cotylo-sciatique. Bulletin de la Société suisse d'anthropologie et d'ethnologie 1952; 28:12–13.
22. Gilbert BM, McKern TW. A method for aging the female Os pubis. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1973; 38(1):31–8.
23. Brooks S, Suchey JM. Skeletal age determination based on the os pubis: A comparison of the Acsádi-Nemeskéri and Suchey-Brooks methods. Hum. Evol. 1990; 5:227–238.
24. Stewart TD. Essentials of Forensic Anthropology. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas; 1979: 165–171.
25. Hartnett KM. Analysis of age-at-death estimation using data from a new, modern autopsy sample--part I: pubic bone. J Forensic Sci. 2010; 55(5):1145-51.
26. Acsádi G, Nemeskéri J. History of human life span and mortality. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó; 1970
27. Walker RA, Lovejoy CO. Radiographic changes in the clavicle and proximal femur and their use in the determination of skeletal age at death. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1985; 68(1):67-–78.
28. Discurso elocuente sobre la muerte de la Illustrissima y Excelentissima Señora Doña Maria Afan Enriquez de Ribera, Princessa de Patternò, duquessa de Bivona y de Alcalá BNE, ms. 1440, ff. 128r-189v.
29. Farina G. Apologia in curatione excellentissimae Catherinae Moncatae, ducissae Montisalti. In Valentino Regio Palatio, Spain: Per Vincentium Sacco; 1658.
30. Fornaciari G. Le mummie aragonesi in San Domenico Maggiore di Napoli. Med Sec 2006; 18:843–864.
31. Biehler-Gomez L, Giordano G, Cattaneo C. The appearance of breast cancer metastases on dry bone: Implications for forensic anthropology. J Forensic Leg Med 2019; 61:5–12.
32. Randall RL. Metastatic Bone Disease: An Integrated Approach to Patient Care. Berlin: Springer; 2015.
33. Pilo Gallisai R. Moncada-Aragón y la Cerda, Luis Guillermo. In: Real Academia de la Historia, Diccionario Biográfico electrónico. Madrid; 2008. (http://dbe.rah.es/biografias/20616/luis-guillermo-moncada-aragon-y-la-cerda).
34. Wendt C, Margolin S. Identifying breast cancer susceptibility genes - a review of the genetic background in familial breast cancer. Acta Oncol 2019; 58(2):135–146.
35. Fabrici d'Acquapendente G. De tumoribus. Roma: Arti Grafiche E. Cossidente & F.lli; 1983.
36. Sakorafas GH, Safioleas M. Breast cancer surgery: an historical narrative. Part I. From prehistoric times to Renaissance. Eur J Cancer Care 2009; 18:530–544.
37. Grmek M. Storia del pensiero medico occidentale 2. Dal Rinascimento all’ inizio dell’800. Bari: Laterza; 1996.
38. Severino MA. De recondita abscessum natura libri VII. Napoli: apud Octavium Beltranum; 1632.
39. Hajdu SI. A Note From History: Landmarks in History of Cancer, Part 2. Cancer 2011; 117(12):2811–20.
40. Nichols HB, Schoemake r MJ, Wright LB et al. The Premenopausal Breast Cancer Collaboration: A Pooling Project of Studies Participating in the National Cancer Institute Cohort Consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017; 26(9):1360–1369.
41. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Breast cancer and breastfeeding: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 47 epidemiological studies in 30 countries, including 50302 women with breast cancer and 96973 women without the disease. Lancet 2002; 360(9328):187–195.
42. Stuebe A. The risks of not breastfeeding for mothers and infants. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2009; 2(4):222–231.
43. Anstey EH, Shoemaker ML, Barrera CM, O'Neil ME, Verma AB, Holman DM. Breastfeeding and Breast Cancer Risk Reduction: Implications for Black Mothers. Am J Prev Med 2017; 53(3S1):S40–S46.
44. Fildes VA. Breast, bottles and babies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 1986.
45. Giuffra V, Fornaciari G. Breastfeeding and weaning in renaissance Italy: the Medici children. Breastfeed Med 2013; 8(3):257–62.
46. Cardoso F, Kyriakides S, Ohno S et al. Early Breast Cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol 2019; 30(8):1194–1220.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
How to Cite
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.