Validation of the Italian Version of the Perception of Aggression Scale (POAS): A Cross-Sectional Study
Contenuto principale dell'articolo
Keywords
Abstract
Background: Aggression in healthcare settings is a persistent occupational hazard that affects staff well-being, the quality of patient care, and organizational dynamics. Understanding healthcare professionals' perceptions of aggression is crucial for designing effective interventions and improving workplace safety. This study aimed to validate the Italian version of the short-form Perception of Aggression Scale (POAS) and to examine how demographic and professional variables influence staff attitudes toward aggression in clinical settings.. Methods:The POAS was administered to a heterogeneous sample of 475 healthcare professionals across multiple hospital departments and educational settings. Psychometric properties, including internal consistency and test-retest reliability, were evaluated. Bivariate and multivariate analyses assessed associations between perceptions of aggression and sociodemographic variables. Results: The Italian POAS demonstrated strong psychometric performance, with high internal consistency (α = 0.82 for dysfunctional; α = 0.76 for functional aggression) and temporal stability. While dysfunctional interpretations of aggression were prevalent across the sample, functional perceptions, viewing aggression as contextually meaningful or communicative, were more common among male participants and physicians. Multivariate analysis revealed a strong inverse relationship between functional and dysfunctional perceptions, suggesting a polarized interpretive schema. Conclusions: The validated Italian POAS is a reliable tool for assessing healthcare workers’ attitudes toward aggression. Its integration into clinical training, audits, and risk management systems could facilitate early identification of negative attitudes and support the development of targeted de-escalation strategies. Future research should investigate longitudinal shifts in perception and the tool’s adaptability across diverse healthcare settings.
Riferimenti bibliografici
2. Finnema EJ, Dassen T, Halfens R. Aggression in psychiatry: a qualitative study focusing on the characteriza-tion and perception of patient aggression by nurses working on psychiatric wards. J Adv Nurs. 1994;19(6):1088-1095. Doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01192.x
3. Jansen G, Dassen T, Moorer P. The perception of aggression. Scand J Caring Sci. 1997;11(1):51-55. Doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.1997.tb00430.x
4. Whittington R, Higgins L. More than zero tolerance? Burnout and tolerance for patient aggression amongst mental health nurses in China and the UK. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2001;106:37-40.
5. Duxbury J, Pulsford D, Hadi M, Sykes S. Staff and patient views on the impact of aggression management training: a longitudinal study. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2013;20(5):437-446.
6. Nijman H, Rector G. Crowding and aggression on inpatient psychiatric wards. Psychiatr Serv. 1999;50:830-831.
7. Trenoweth S. Perceiving risk in dangerous situations: Risks of violence among mental health inpatients. J Adv Nurs. 2003;42:278-287.
8. Firenze A, Santangelo OE, Gianfredi V, et al. Violence on doctors. An observational study in Northern Italy. Med Lav. 2020;111(1):46-53.
9. D.Lgs. 502/1992 “Riordino della disciplina in materia sanitaria, a norma dell'articolo 1 della legge 23 otto-bre 1992, n. 421” (pubblicato il 30 dicembre 1992), integrato dal D.Lgs. 229/1999. Disponibile al sito https://www.normattiva.it/uri-res/N2Ls?urn:nir:stato:decreto.legislativo:1992-12-30;502!vig=
10. Abderhalden C, Needham I, Friedli TK, Poelmans J, Dassen T. Perception of aggression among psychiatric nurses in Switzerland. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2002;106(Suppl 412):1107.
11. Whittington R, Richter D. From the individual to the interpersonal: Environment and interaction in the es-calation of violence in mental health settings. In Richter D, Whittington R, eds. Violence in Mental Health Settings: Causes, Consequences, Management. New York: Springer; 2006. p. 47-68.
12. Edward KL, Ousey K, Warelow P, Lui S. Nursing and aggression in the workplace: a systematic review. Br J Nurs. 2014;23(12):653-4, 656-9.
13. Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP. Job burnout. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:397-422.
14. Bowers L, Nijman H, Simpson A, Jones J. The relationship between leadership, teamworking, structure, burnout and attitude to patients on acute psychiatric wards. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2011;46(2):143-148.
15. Alaerts K, Nackaerts E, Meyns P, Swinnen SP, Wenderoth N. Action and emotion recognition from point light displays: an investigation of gender differences. PLoS One. 2011;6:e2098.
16. Blanch-Hartigan D. An effective training to increase accurate recognition of patient emotion cues. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;89:274-280.
17. Price O, Baker J, Bee P, Lovell K. The influence of de-escalation training and environmental physical changes on inpatient aggression: a systematic review. Aggress Behav. 2018;44(1):4-23.
Barra laterale dell'articolo
Dettagli dell'articolo
Come citare
Questo volume è pubblicato con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale 4.0 Internazionale.
All Journal's articles are Open Access papers distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY-NC 4.0 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.
Come citare
