Assessing Work Addiction: Validity of the Italian Version of the Work Addiction Risk Test
Keywords:
WART, Scale validation, work addictionAbstract
Background: Work addiction is a contemporary addiction affecting 8.3% to 22% of individuals in Europe, leading to detrimental effects on relationships, work-family balance, and overall well-being. Given its prevalence and impact, standardized assessment tools are crucial for distinguishing between work addiction and healthy work engagement. Methods: This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Work Addiction Risk Test (WART). A convenience sample of 700 workers from Northeastern and Southern Italy completed the Italian version of the WART along with other well-being at work and personality measures. Results:Exploratory factor analysis revealed a five-factor structure of the WART, partially overlapping with the original version. Despite some weaknesses in the factor structure, the WART demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties, including internal consistency and associations with organizational and personality correlates of work addiction. Conclusions: The Italian version of the WART is a reliable tool for assessing work addiction risk among Italian workers. This tool can aid in identifying individuals at risk and facilitating early intervention and support. Future research should focus on further validating the factor structure and exploring the utility of the WART indifferent cultural and occupational contexts.
References
1. Andreassen CS, Griffiths MD, Hetland J, et al. The Prevalence of Workaholism: A Survey Study in a Nation- ally Representative Sample of Norwegian Employees. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(8). Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102446
2. Ravoux H, Pereira B, Brousse G, et al. Work addiction test questionnaire to assess workaholism: Valida- tion of French version. JMIR Ment Health. 2018;5(3). Doi: 10.2196/mental.8222
3. Schaufeli WB, Taris TW, Bakker AB. It takes two to tango: Workaholism is working exces-sively and work- ing compulsively. In: Burke RJ, ed. The Long Work Hours Culture: Caus-es, Consequences and Choices.
4. Melbourne, Australia: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2008:203-226. Doi:10.1108/S1877- 6361(2008)0000006007
5. Ng TWH, Sorensen KL, Feldman DC. Dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of workaholism: A conceptual integration and extension. J Organ Behav. 2007;28(1):111-136. Doi: 10.1002/job.424
6. Spence JT, Robbins AS. Workaholism: Definition, measurement, and preliminary results. J Pers Assess. 1992;58(1):160-178. Doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5801_15
7. Robinson BE, Flowers C, Carroll J. Work stress and marriage: A theoretical model ex-amining the relationship between workaholism and marital cohesion. Int J Stress Man-age. 2001;8(3):165-175. Doi: 10.1023/A:1011330508931
8. Andreassen CS, Hetland J, Pallesen S. Workaholism and work–family spillover in a cross-occupational sample. Eur J Work Organ Psy. 2013;22(1):78-87. Doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2011.626201
9. Bonebright CA, Clay DL, Ankenmann RD. The relationship of workaholism with work–life conflict, life sat- isfaction, and purpose in life. J Couns Psychol. 2000;47(4):469-477. Doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.47.4.469
10. Gillet N, Morin AJ, Sandrin E, et al. Investigating the combined effects of workaholism and work engage- ment: A substantive-methodological synergy of variable-centered and person-centered methodologies. J Vocat Behav. 2018;109:54-77. Doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2018.09.006
11. Ten Brummelhuis LL, Rothbard NP, Uhrich B. Beyond Nine to Five: Is working to excess bad for health?. Acad Manage Discoveries. 2017;3(3):262-283. Doi: 10.5465/amd.2015.0120
12. Balducci C, Avanzi L, Fraccaroli F. The individual “costs” of workaholism: An analysis based on multi- source and prospective data. J Manage. 2018;44(7):2961-2986. Doi: 10.1177/0149206316658348
13. Clark MA, Michel JS, Zhdanova L, et al. All work and no play? A meta-analytic examina-tion of the corre- lates and outcomes of workaholism. J Manage. 2016;42(7):1836-1873. Doi: 10.1177/0149206314522301
14. Andreassen CS. Workaholism: An overview and current status of the research. J Behav Addict. 2014;3(1):1-11. Doi: 10.1556/JBA.2.2013.017
15. Edwards JR, Baglioni AJ. Relationship between type A behavior pattern and mental and physical symp- toms: a comparison of global and component measures. J Appl Psy-chol. 1991;76(2):276-290. Doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.276
16. Andreassen CS, Hetland J, Pallesen S. The relationship between ‘workaholism’, basic needs satisfaction at work and personality. Eur J Personality. 2010;24(1):3-17. Doi: 10.1002/per.737
17. Andreassen CS, Griffiths MD, Gjertsen SR, et al. The relationships between behavioral addictions and the five-factor model of personality. J Behav Addict. 2013;2(2):90-99. Doi: 10.1556/JBA.2.2013.003
18. Clark MA, Lelchook AM, Taylor ML. Beyond the Big Five: How narcissism, perfectionism, and dispositional affect relate to workaholism. Pers Indiv Differ. 2010;48(7):786-791. Doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.013
19. Bakker AB, Demerouti E. The job demands-resources model: State of the art. J Manage Psychol. 2007;22(3):309-328. Doi: 10.1108/02683940710733115
20. Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, van der Heijden FM, et al. Workaholism among medical resi-dents: It is the com- bination of working excessively and compulsively that counts. Int J Stress Manage. 2009;16(3):249-272. Doi: 10.1037/a0017537
21. Robinson BE. The Work Addiction Risk Test: Development of a tentative measure of workaholism. Percept Motor Skill. 1999;88(1):199-210. Doi:10.2466/pms.1999.88.1.199
22. Robinson BE, Post P. Risk of addiction to work and family functioning. Psychol Rep. 1997;81(1):91-95. Doi: 10.2466/pr0.1997.81.1.91
23. Robinson BE, Post P, Khakee JF. Test-retest reliability of the Work Addiction Risk Test. Percept Motor Skill. 1992;75(3 Pt 2):926-926. Doi: 10.2466/pms.1992.75.3.926
24. Bartczak M, Ogińska-Bulik N. Workaholism and mental health among Polish academic workers. Int J Occup Saf Ergo. 2012;18(1):3-13. Doi: 10.1080/10803548.2012.11076916
25. Flowers CP, Robinson BE. A structural and discriminant analysis of the Work Addiction Risk Test. Educ Psychol Meas. 2002;62(3):517-526. Doi: 10.1177/0013164402062003010
26. Andreassen CS, Hetland J, Pallesen S. Psychometric assessment of workaholism measures. J Manage Psychol. 2014;29(1):7-24. Doi: 10.1108/JMP-05-2013-0143
27. Urbán R, Kun B, Mózes T, et al. A Four-Factor Model of Work Addiction: The Development of the Work Addiction Risk Test Revised. Eur Addict Res. 2019;25(3):145-160. Doi:10.1159/000500504
28. Di Nicola M, Tedeschi D, Mazza M, et al. Behavioural addictions in bipolar disorder pa-tients: role of impul- sivity and personality dimensions. J Affect Disord. 2010;125(1-3):82-88. Doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.12.017
29. Molino M, Ghislieri C, Colombo L. Working excessively: theoretical and methodological considerations. Ital J Occup Med Ergon. 2012;34(1).
30. Maslach C, Jackson SE. The measurement of experienced burnout. J Organ Behav. 1981;2(2):99-113. Doi: 10.1002/job.4030020205
31. Marcatto F, D’Errico G, Di Blas L, et al. La valutazione dello stress lavoro correlato: adatta-mento italiano dell’HSE Management Standards Work-Related Stress Indicator Tool. Ital J Occup Med Ergon. 2011;33(1):403-408.
32. Marcatto F, Di Blas L, Luis O, et al. The Perceived Occupational Stress scale: A brief tool for measuring workers’ perception of stress at work. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2022;38(5):293-306. Doi:10.1027/1015- 5759/a000657
33. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer; 1984.
34. Diener ED, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, et al. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess. 1985;49(1):71-75. Doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
35. Rosenberg M. Conceiving the Self. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1979.
36. Ashton MC, Lee K, Perugini M, et al. A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004;86(2):356-366. Doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.356
37. Zung WWK. A rating instrument for anxiety disorders. Psychosomatics. 1971;12(6):371-379. Doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(71)71479-0
38. Zung WWK. A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1965;12(1):63-70. Doi:10.1001/arch- psyc.1965.01720310065008
39. Jones DN, Paulhus DL. Introducing the short dark triad (SD3) a brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment. 2014;21(1):28-41. Doi: 10.1177/1073191113514105
40. Jauk E, Dieterich R. Addiction and the dark triad of personality. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:662. Doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00662
41. Jonason PK, Slomski S, Partyka J. The Dark Triad at work: How toxic employees get their way. Pers Indiv Differ. 2012;52(3):449-453. Doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.008
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Francesco Marcatto, Lisa Di Blas, Donatella Ferrante, Simone Festa, Ilaria Palomba, Francesca Larese Filon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All Journal's articles are Open Access papers distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.
This work is licensed under a CC BY-NC 4.0 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
