Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Work-Related Questionnaire for Upper Extremity Disorders (WORQ-UP)
Keywords:
Upper Extremity, Musculoskeletal Disorders, Work-Related Questionnaire for Upper Extremity Disorders, WORQ-UPAbstract
Background: The Work-Related Questionnaire for Upper Extremity Disorders (WORQ-UP) serves as a patient-reported outcome measure to identify work-related limitations in individuals with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. This study aims to adapt the WORQ-UP into Turkish and subsequently evaluate its validity and reliability. Methods: The Turkish WORQ-UP, along with the previously validated Turkish Quick DASH, were administered to 136 patients. The Turkish WORQ-UP was applied twice within a 7-14 day interval to assess test-retest reliability. Reliability was assessed using measures of internal consistency and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). For validity assessment, Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated between the Turkish WORQ-UP and Quick DASH, and Explanatory (EFA) and Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted. Results: In the reliability analysis, items 11, 12, 13, 15, and 16, which did not meet the criterion of item total score correlation >30, were excluded, resulting in a 12-item Turkish WORQ-UP with satisfactory validity and reliability outcomes. The Cronbach's alpha and ICC were calculated as 0.895 and 0.879, respectively, while the SEM and MDC were determined to be 0.93 and 1.85. In the EFA, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure (0.895) and Bartlett's tests were both significant (p < 0.001). Additionally, the CFA indicated an acceptable fit with two factors. The goodness of fit indices, including χ2/df = 2.09, CFI = 0.934, TLI = 0.918, and RMSEA = 0.08, confirmed the adequacy of the model. The 12-item Turkish WORQ-UP showed a significant and strong correlation (r = 0.754; p < 0.001) with Quick DASH. Conclusion: The Turkish version of WORQ-UP with 12 items had proper psychometric properties to identify work-related limitations in individuals with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders.
References
de Kok J, Vroonhof P, Snijders J, Roullis G, Clarke M, Peereboom K. Work-related MSDs: prevalence, costs and demographics in the EU - European Risk Observatory
Executive summary [Internet]. Bilbao: Eu OSHA; 2019 p. 18.
Rapicault C, Roquelaure Y, Bodin J, Fouquet N, Bertrais S. Development and validation of a work-related risk score for upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders in a French working population. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2023;49(8):558-568. Doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4119
Roquelaure Y, Ha C, Rouillon C, et al. Risk factors for upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders in the working population. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(10):1425-1434. Doi: 10.1002/art.24740
Nambiema A, Bodin J, Stock S, et al. Proportion and Number of Upper-Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders Attributable to the Combined Effect of Biomechanical and Psychosocial Risk Factors in a Working Population. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(8):3858. Published 2021 Apr 7. Doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083858
Nambiema A, Bodin J, Fouquet N, et al. Upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders: how many cases can be prevented? Estimates from the COSALI cohort. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2020;46(6):618-629. Doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3911
Huisstede BM, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Koes BW, Verhaar JA. Incidence and prevalence of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. A systematic appraisal of the literature. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:7. Published 2006 Jan 31. Doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-7
Walker-Bone K, Palmer KT, Reading I, Coggon D, Cooper C. Prevalence and impact of musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb in the general population. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51(4):642-651. Doi: 10.1002/art.20535
Hagberg M, Silverstein B, Wells R, Smith MJ, Hendricks HW, Carayon P, et al. Work related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs): a reference book for prevention. London: Taylor & Francis; 1995.
National Research Council, The National Academy of Sciences. Musculoskeletal disorders and the workplace: low back and upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Washington (DC): National Academy; 2001.
Punnett L, Wegman DH. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: the epidemiologic evidence and the debate. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004;14(1):13-23. Doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.09.015
Bernard BP. Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors: a critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper-extremity, and low back. Cincinnati (OH): US Health and Human Services; 1997.
Bongers PM, Kremer AM, ter Laak J. Are psychosocial factors, risk factors for symptoms and signs of the shoulder, elbow, or hand/wrist?: A review of the epidemiological literature. Am J Ind Med. 2002;41(5):315-342. Doi: 10.1002/ajim.10050
Bongers PM, Ijmker S, van den Heuvel S, Blatter BM. Epidemiology of work related neck and upper limb problems: psychosocial and personal risk factors (part I) and effective interventions from a bio behavioural perspective (part II). J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(3):279-302. Doi: 10.1007/s10926-006-9044-1
Morse TF, Dillon C, Warren N, Levenstein C, Warren A. The economic and social consequences of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: the Connecticut Upper-Extremity Surveillance Project (CUSP). Int J Occup Environ Health. 1998;4(4):209-216. Doi: 10.1179/oeh.1998.4.4.209
Ekberg K, Wildhagen I. Long-term sickness absence due to musculoskeletal disorders: the necessary intervention of work conditions. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1996;28(1):39-47.
Aerts BRJ, Kuijer PPFM, Beumer A, Eygendaal D, Frings-Dresen MHW. Development of a novel WOrk-Related Questionnaire for UPper extremity disorders (WORQ-UP). Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017;90(8):823-833. Doi: 10.1007/s00420-017-1246-7
Aerts BR, Kuijer PP, Beumer A, Eygendaal D, Frings-Dresen MH. WOrk-Related Questionnaire for UPper extremity disorders (WORQ-UP): Factor Analysis and Internal Consistency. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(9):1818-1826. Doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.03.013
Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, et al. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48(6):661-671. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.01.016
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Gibbons E, et al. Inter-rater agreement and reliability of the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments) checklist. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:82. Published 2010 Sep 22. Doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-82
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186-3191. Doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
Mokkink LB, Prinsen CA, Bouter LM, Vet HC, Terwee CB. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Braz J Phys Ther. 2016;20(2):105-113. Doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143
Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN; Upper Extremity Collaborative Group. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(5):1038-1046. Doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02060
Tsang S, Royse CF, Terkawi AS. Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017;11(Suppl 1):S80-S89. Doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17
Cronbach, L. J., & Shavelson, R. J. My Current Thoughts on Coefficient Alpha and Successor Procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2004;64(3),391-418. Doi: 10.1177/0013164404266386
Field, A., Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 2nd ed. London: Sage, 2005
Enderlein, G. Fleiss, J. L. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. Wiley, New York – Chichester – Brislane – Toronto – Singapore 1986, 432 S., £38.35. Biom. J., 30: 304-304. Doi: 10.1002/bimj.4710300308
Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(1):231-240.
Tinsley HE, Workman KR, Kass RA. Factor analysis of the domain of client expectancies about counseling. J Couns Psychol. 1980;27(6):561.
The jamovi project. Jamovi (Version 1.6.23.0) [Computer Software]. Avaible Online: https://www.jamovi.org (accessed on 10.04.2024)
Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(5):1763-1768.
Doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864
Shariyate MJ, Beumer A, Kachooei AR. Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of WOrk-Related Questionnaire for UPper Extremity Disorders (WORQ-UP). J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2023;28(1):102-107. Doi: 10.1142/S2424835523500030
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
All Journal's articles are Open Access papers distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.
This work is licensed under a CC BY-NC 4.0 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.