Humans histological evaluation of regenerative activity using Subdermal Induced Heat (S.I.H.) Technology®

Humans histological evaluation of regenerative activity using Subdermal Induced Heat (S.I.H.) Technology®

Authors

  • Giorgio Maullu Aesthetic Medicine Master Coordinator, University of Sassari, Italy
  • Alessio Pirino Biomedical Studies Associate Professor, University of Sassari, Italy
  • Andrea Sbarbati Human Anatomy Full Professor; University of Verona, Italy
  • Benedetta Fanelli Plastic and Reconstructive Unit, Ausl Latina, Sapienza University of Roma Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy
  • Nicolò Scuderi Plastic and Reconstructive Emeritus Professor, Sapienza University of Roma, Roma, Italy

Keywords:

Subdermal Radiofrequency , histological evaluation, human regenerative response

Abstract

Introduction: The use of radiofrequency (RF) in aesthetic medicine is widely appreciated for its ability to heat cutaneous and muscular tissues, leading to collagen denaturation and stimulating new collagen and elastin production, alongside improved blood flow. However, precise temperature control is essential to avoid surface skin damage. Subdermal Induced Heat (S.I.H.) Technology® represents an advancement in RF application, delivering targeted heat to subcutaneous tissue while preserving skin surface integrity. This technique may improve tissue tone and elasticity, provide analgesic benefits, and accelerate tissue repair. Materials and methods: The study involved five female patients aged 30 to 58, treated with endodermic RF using S.I.H. technology in the abdominal (two cases), gluteal (two cases), and inner thigh (one case) regions. Three patients were treated at 50°C under Klein's solution, and two at 48°C under local anesthesia, with each session lasting 25 minutes per side. Biopsies were collected pre-treatment (T0), at 1 month (two patients), at 3 months (T1), and at 6 months (T2) post-treatment. Histological analysis was performed using hematoxylin-eosin and orcein staining to assess connective tissue and elastic fibers. Results: Histology revealed significant skin improvements in all patients at six months. Initially, the epidermis was thin, with reduced dermal papillae and deep-seated elastic fibers. At three months, increased vascularization and superficial migration of elastic fibers were noted. By six months, dermal papillae elongation, dermal thickening, and further reorganization and proliferation of elastic fibers were evident, without pathological changes. Discussion: RF is known for its regenerative effects. This study highlights how subcutaneous RF via S.I.H. technology promotes tissue regeneration without inducing elastosis or fibrosis. Significant improvements were observed, especially in younger subjects, including enhanced dermal structure and elastic fiber organization. Conclusions: Endodermic RF using S.I.H. technology stimulates the regeneration of essential skin components safely, ensuring effective results without adverse tissue reactions.

References

1. Sadick NS, Makino Y. Selective electro-thermolysis in aesthetic medicine: a review. Lasers Surg Med. 2004; 34(2):91–97.

2. Zelickson BD, Kist D, Bernstein E, et al. Histological and ultrastructural evaluation of the ef-fects of a radiofrequency-based nonablative dermal remodeling device: a pilot study. Arch Dermatol. 2004; 140(2):204–209.

3. Goldman A, Shavelzon D, Blugerman G. Laser lipolysis: Liposuction using Nd:YAG laser. Rev Soc Brasil Chir Plast. 2002; 17:17–21.

4. Goldman A. Submental Nd:YAG laser-assisted liposuction. Lasers Surg Med. 2006; 38(3):181–184.

5. Arnoczkay SP, Aksan A. Thermal modification of connective tissues: Basic science considera-tions and clinical implications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000; 8(5):305–313.

6. Dierickx CC. The role of deep heating for non invasive skin rejuvenation. Laser Surg Med. 2006; 38(9):799–807.

7. Hsu TS, Kaminer MS. The use of nonablative radiofrequency technology to tighten the lower face and neck. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2003; 22(2):115-23.

8. Fitzpatrick R, Geronemus R, Goldberg D, Kaminer M, Kilmer S, Ruiz-Esparza J. Multicenter study of noninvasive radiofrequency for periorbital tissue tightening. Lasers Surg Med. 2003; 33(4):232–342.

9. Alster TS, Tanzi E. Improvement of neck and cheek laxity with a nonablative radiofrequency device: a lifting experience. Dermatol Surg. 2004; 30(4 Pt 1):503–507.

10. Nahm WK, Su TT, Rotunda AM, Moy RL. Objective changes in brow position, superior pal-pebral crease, peak angle of the eyebrow and jowl surface area after volumetric radiofrequen-cy treatments to half of the face. Dermatol Surg. 2004; 30(6):922–928.

11. Fritz M, Counters JT, Zelickson BD. Radiofrequency treatment for middle and lower face lax-ity. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004; 6(6):370–373.

12. Koch RJ. Radiofrequency nonablative tissue tightening. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2004; 12(3):339–346.

13. Weiss RA, Weiss MA, Munavalli G, Beasley KL. Monopolar radiofrequency facial tighten-ing: A retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety in over 600 treatments. J Drugs Dermatol. 2006; 5(8):707–712.

14. Alexiades-Armenakas M, Rosenberg D, Renton B, Dover J, Arndt K. Blinded, randomized, quantitative grading comparison of minimally invasive, fractional radiofrequency and surgical face-lift to treat skin laxity. Arch Dermatol. 2010; 146(4):396–405.

15. Fanelli B, Scuderi N. Subcutaneous radiofrequency: prospective pilot study on safety and effi-cacy in face chrono-ageing treatment. J Dermat Cosmetol. 2021; 5(3):57-60.

16. Fanelli B, Scuderi N. Controlled heat in the treatment of face chronoaging: evaluation of the efficacy, tolerability and safety of different treatment protocols. Aesthetic Medicine. 2022; 8(3):18-23.

17. Scuderi N, Maullu G, Fanelli B. Subdermal Induced Heat (S.I.H.) technology for malar bags treatment. Preliminary clinical evaluation Aesthetic Medicine. 2023; 9(2):e2023009.

18. Sito G, Walker L, Cetto R, Trévidic CLG. ATTIVA S.I.H. Technology. MINERVA MEDICA; 2021.

19. Oesch S, Vingan NR, Li X, Hoopman J, Akgul Y, Kenkel JM. A Correlation of the Glogau Scale With VISIA-CR Complexion Analysis Measurements in Assessing Facial Photoaging for Clinical Research. Aesthet Surg J. 2022; 42(10):1175-1184.

20. Gershinowitz A, Gat A VoluDerm microneedle technology for skin treatments-in vivo histo-logical evidence. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2015; 17(1):9-14.

21. Zheng Z, Goo B, Kim DY, Kang JS, Cho SB Histometric analysis of skin-radiofrequency in-teraction using a fractionated microneedle delivery system. Dermatol Surg. 2014; 40(2):134-41.

22. Boinsic S, Branchet MC. Ex-vivo study of hybrid energy technology using a human skin model. Eur J Dermatol. 2014; 24(1):46-52.

23. Lee HJ, Seo SR, Yoon MS, Song JY, Lee EY, Lee SE. Microneedle fractional radiofrequen-cy increase epidermal Hyaluronan and reverses age-ralated epidermal dysfuction. Lasers Surg Med. 2016; 48(2):140-9.

Downloads

Published

31-03-2025

How to Cite

1.
Maullu G, Pirino A, Sbarbati A, Fanelli B, Scuderi N. Humans histological evaluation of regenerative activity using Subdermal Induced Heat (S.I.H.) Technology®. Aesthetic Medicine [Internet]. 2025 Mar. 31 [cited 2025 Apr. 4];11(1):16033. Available from: https://mattioli1885journals.com/index.php/aestheticmedicine/article/view/16033