Seven Pillars for a Community-Led AI-POCUS Future – A WINFOCUS Manifesto

This is a preview and has not been published.

Seven Pillars for a Community-Led AI-POCUS Future – A WINFOCUS Manifesto

Authors

  • Adrian Wong Dept of Intensive Care Medicine, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore; Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Malaysia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4968-7328
  • Julina Noor Dept of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Francesco Corradi Dept of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Azienda Tutela della Salute Liguria, ASL, 5, La Spezia, Italy
  • Gabriele Via Cardiac Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Istituto Cardiocentro Ticino, Università della Svizzera Italiana (USI), Lugano, Switzerland

Keywords:

POCUS, Machine learning (ML), Artificial intelligence (AI), Ultrasound

Abstract

The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) represents a transformative shift, offering the potential to democratize diagnostic expertise while simultaneously presenting significant risks regarding clinical validation, workforce preparedness, and health equity. Informed by a recent global survey indicating that while 81% of practitioners are optimistic about AI, major concerns remain regarding training and evidence gaps, the World Interactive Network Focused On Critical UltraSound (WINFOCUS) proposes a unified strategic framework. This manifesto outlines seven foundational pillars to guide the ethical and effective adoption of AI-augmented POCUS: (1) earning trust through rigorous, prospective evidence; (2) building an AI-literate workforce through evolved curricula; (3) championing global equity to prevent widening health disparities; (4) ensuring algorithmic transparency and accountability; (5) designing for seamless human-AI collaboration; (6) establishing a sustainable, privacy-centric data infrastructure; and (7) committing to continuous, patient-centered evaluation. We present this roadmap as a global call to action for clinicians, researchers, and industry partners to collectively shape a future where technology amplifies clinical wisdom and improves patient outcomes.

References

[1] GE HealthCare. "GE HealthCare to Acquire Caption Health." February 9, 2023. https://www.gehealthcare.com/about/newsroom/press-releases/ge-healthcare-to-acquire-caption-health-expanding-ultrasound-to-support-new-users-through-fda-cleared-ai-powered-image-guidance-

[2] UltraSight. "FDA Grants Clearance for UltraSight's AI-Powered Cardiac Ultrasound Technology." July 27, 2023. https://ultrasight.com/fda-grants-clearance-for-ultrasights-ai-powered-cardiac-ultrasound-technology/

[3] Motazedian P, Marbach JA, Prosperi-Porta G et al. Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound with artificial intelligence-assisted assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction. NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Oct 28;6(1):201. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00945-1. PMID: 37898711; PMCID: PMC10613290.

[4] Kagiyama, N., Abe, Y., Kusunose, K. et al. Multicenter validation study for automated left ventricular ejection fraction assessment using a handheld ultrasound with artificial intelligence. Sci Rep 14, 15359 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65557-5

[5] Wong, A., Roslan, N.L., McDonald, R. et al. Clinical obstacles to machine-learning POCUS adoption and system-wide AI implementation (The COMPASS-AI survey). Ultrasound J 17, 32 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-025-00436-2

[6] Lekadir, K., et al. 2025. "FUTURE-AI: international consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare." BMJ 2025; 388 e081554 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-081554

[7] Kim S, Fischetti C, Guy M, Hsu E, Fox J, Young SD. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Applications for Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in Low-Resource Settings: A Scoping Review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 1;14(15):1669. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14151669.

[8] Caroline Jones, James Thornton, Jeremy C Wyatt, Artificial intelligence and clinical decision support: clinicians’ perspectives on trust, trustworthiness, and liability, Medical Law Review, Volume 31, Issue 4, Autumn 2023, Pages 501–520, https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwad013

[9] Vaccaro M, Almaatouq A, Malone T. When combinations of humans and AI are useful: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Dec;8(12):2293-2303. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02024-1. Epub 2024 Oct 28.

[10] Chen, M., Wang, Y., Wang, Q. et al. Impact of human and artificial intelligence collaboration on workload reduction in medical image interpretation. Digit. Med. 7, 349 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01328-w

Downloads

How to Cite

1.
Wong A, Noor J, Corradi F, Via G. Seven Pillars for a Community-Led AI-POCUS Future – A WINFOCUS Manifesto. Ultrasound J. 18(S1):18454. doi:10.5826/tuj.2026.18454