Is remotely supervised ultrasound (tele-ultrasound) inferior to the traditional service model of ultrasound with an in-person imaging specialist? A systematic review
Abstract
Background: Tele-ultrasound is known to offer potential benefits such as improved access and cost efficiency, but concerns still exist about image quality, operator skill, and data security. This study aimed to determine whether remotely supervised ultrasound is inferior to traditional in-centre ultrasound with an in-person imaging specialist regarding patient care quality, service quality, and access to care.
Methods: A systematic search for a critical appraisal of relevant peer-reviewed published literature, as well as a jurisdictional scan of relevant regulations and standards in other Canadian jurisdictions, was performed.
Results: Of the original 6051 discrete records identified through the search, 18 studies were selected for inclusion in the review. They originated from 11 countries, and the patient populations spanned infants, children, adults, and pregnant women. The medical applications were echocardiography (including fetal), obstetrical ultrasound, breast ultrasound, thyroid ultrasound, and abdominal ultrasound. The distance between the tele-ultrasound site and the reference site ranged from 23 to 365 km, or a 30 to 45-min drive. In 3 studies, tele-ultrasound images were acquired in one country (India, Peru) and interpreted in another (US or UK). The majority of studies reported good diagnostic accuracy (the proportion of agreement between tele-ultrasound and in-centre ultrasound ranged from 43.4% to 100%, sensitivity ranged from 43% to 97%, and specificity ranged from 77.4% to 100% across studies and tele-ultrasound application). Details are displayed in Supplementary Table 2. There was limited evidence on patients’ and providers’ perspectives on tele-ultrasound, but in the studies identified, more than half of the patients surveyed felt that tele-ultrasound was acceptable. Additionally, all comments from providers were positive, including their perspectives on the value of tele-ultrasound. The image quality results were mixed. Some studies found that image quality ranged from at least sufficient quality for diagnosis to excellent. However, some other studies reported inadequate image quality in up to 36.8% of cases. It is possible that this range of responses may be due to the varying technical ability/capacity of local tele-ultrasound systems to acquire and transmit images to a remote reader. Cost savings associated with tele-ultrasound were also reported and attributed mainly to travel costs for patients.
Conclusion: There is no consistent evidence that tele-ultrasound is inferior to in-centre ultrasound, although further high-quality studies are needed.
References
1. Jost RGD, Samuel J. III, editor Medical imaging 1995. PACS design and evaluation: engineering and clinical issues: 28 February–2 March 1995, San Diego, California. Medical Imaging 1995; 1995; Bellingham, Wash., USA: SPIE.
2. Recker F, Höhne E, Damjanovic D, Schaefer VS (2022) Ultrasound in telemedicine: a brief overview. Appl Sci 12(3):958
3. Yang B, Mallett S, Takwoingi Y, Davenport CF, Hyde CJ, Whiting PF et al (2021) QUADAS-C: a tool for assessing risk of bias in comparative diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 174(11):1592–1599
4. Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20(1):37-46;
5. Nelson KP, Edwards D (2019) A paired kappa to compare binary ratings across two medical tests. Stat Med 38(17):3272–3287
6. Lewin M, Xu C, Jordan M, Borchers H, Ayton C, Wilbert D, Melzer S (2006) Accuracy of paediatric echocardiographic transmission via telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 12(8):416–421
7. Mulholland HC, Casey F, Brown D, Corrigan N, Quinn M, McCord B et al (1999) Application of a low cost telemedicine link to the diagnosis of neonatal congenital heart defects by remote consultation. Heart 82(2):217–221 8. McCrossan BA, Grant B, Morgan GJ, Sands AJ, Craig B, Casey FA (2008) Diagnosis of congenital heart disease in neonates by videoconferencing: an eight-year experience. J Telemed Telecare 14(3):137–140
9. Casey F, Brown D, Craig BG, Rogers J, Mulholland HC (1996) Diagnosis of neonatal congenital heart defects by remote consultation using a low-cost telemedicine link. J Telemed Telecare 2(3):165–169
10. Widmer S, Ghisla R, Ramelli GP, Taminelli F, Widmer B, Caoduro L, Gallino A (2003) Tele-echocardiography in paediatrics. Eur J Pediatr 162(4):271–275
11. Grant B, Morgan GJ, McCrossan BA, Crealey GE, Sands AJ, Craig B, Casey FA (2010) Remote diagnosis of congenital heart disease: the impact of telemedicine. Arch Dis Child 95(4):276–280
12. Alsharqi M, Ismavel VA, Arnold L, Choudhury SS, Solomi VC, Rao SRS et al (2022) Focused cardiac ultrasound to guide the diagnosis of heart failure in pregnant women in India. J Am Soc Echocardiog 35(12):1281–1294
13. McCrossan BA, Sands AJ, Kileen T, Cardwell CR, Casey FA (2011) Fetal diagnosis of congenital heart disease by telemedicine. Arch Dis Child-Fetal 96(6):F394–F397
14. Sun YK, Li XL, Wang Q, Zhou BY, Zhu AQ, Qin C et al (2022) Improving the quality of breast ultrasound examination performed by inexperienced ultrasound doctors with synchronous tele-ultrasound: a prospective, parallel controlled trial. Ultrasonography 41(2):307–316
15. Li XL, Sun YK, Wang Q, Chen ZT, Qian ZB, Xu HX, Guo LH (2022) Synchronous tele-ultrasonography is helpful for a naive operator to perform high-quality thyroid ultrasound examinations. Ultrasonography 41(4):650–660
16. Marini TJ, Weiss SL, Gupta A, Zhao YT, Baran TM, Garra B et al (2021) Testing telediagnostic thyroid ultrasound in Peru: a new horizon in expanding access to imaging in rural and underserved areas. J Endocrinol Invest 44(12):2699–2708
17. Marini TJ, Oppenheimer DC, Baran TM, Rubens DJ, Dozier A, Garra B et al (2021) Testing telediagnostic right upper quadrant abdominal ultrasound in Peru: a new horizon in expanding access to imaging in rural and underserved areas. PLoS ONE 16(8):e0255919
18. Jemal K, Ayana D, Tadesse F, Adefris M, Awol M, Tesema M et al (2024) Implementation and evaluation of a pilot antenatal ultrasound imaging programme using tele-ultrasound in Ethiopia. J Telemed Telecare 30(6):1005–1016
19. Toscano M, Marini TJ, Drennan K, Baran TM, Kan J, Garra B et al (2021) Testing telediagnostic obstetric ultrasound in Peru: a new horizon in expanding access to prenatal ultrasound. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21(1):328
20. Evangelista A, Galuppo V, Mendez J, Evangelista L, Arpal L, Rubio C et al (2016) Hand-held cardiac ultrasound screening performed by family doctors with remote expert support interpretation. Heart 102(5):376–382
21. Hjorth-Hansen AK, Andersen GN, Graven T, Gundersen GH, Kleinau JO, Mjolstad OC et al (2020) Feasibility and accuracy of tele-echocardiography, with examinations by nurses and interpretation by an expert via telemedicine, in an outpatient heart failure clinic. J Ultras Med 39(12):2313–2323
22. Kaneko T, Kagiyama N, Nakamura Y, Hirasawa T, Murata A, Morimoto R et al (2022) Effectiveness of real-time tele-ultrasound for echocardiography in resource-limited medical teams. J Echocardiogr 20(1):16–23
23. Sable CA, Cummings SD, Pearson GD, Schratz LM, Cross RC, Quivers ES et al (2002) Impact of telemedicine on the practice of pediatric cardiology in community hospitals. Pediatrics 109(1):E3
24. Bank W. World Bank Open Data – Ethiopia: World Bank; 2025. https:// datab ank. world bank. org/ repor ts. aspx? source= 2& count ry= ETH.
25. Britton N, Miller MA, Safadi S, Siegel A, Levine AR, McCurdy MT (2019) Teleultrasound in resource-limited settings: a systematic review. Front Public Health 7:244
26. Yeung R, Black D, Chen PB, Lessoway V, Reid J, Rangel-Suarez S, Chang SD, Salcudean SE. Mixed Reality Tele-ultrasound over 750 km: a clinical study. 2024. https:// arxiv. org/ abs/ 2409. 13058.
27. Oluyomi T, Cooper S, Roggensack A, Birch C, Egege S, Kelly M et al (2023) Introduction of a maternal-fetal medicine tele-ultrasound program in rural Alberta. J Obstet Gynaecol Ca 45(7):503–505
28. Deeks J, Higgins J, Altman D, McKenzie J, Veroniki A. Chapter 10: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page M, Welch V, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2024.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Thy Lai, Tania Stafinski, Jeremy Beach, Devidas Menon (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.
