The key role of public health in renovating Italian biomedical doctoral programs
Keywords:
Doctoral education; postgraduate research; public health; quality assuranceAbstract
Background. A key renovation of doctoral programs is currently ongoing in Italy. Public health and its competencies may play a pivotal role in high-level training to scientific research, including interdisciplinary and methodological abilities.
Methods. As a case study, we used the ongoing renovation of the Clinical and Experimental Medicine doctoral program at the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia. We focused on how the program is designed to meet national requirements as well as students’ needs, thus improving educational standards for scientific research in the biomedical field, and on the specific contribution of public health and epidemiology in such an effort.
Results. The renovation process of doctoral programs in Italy, with specific reference to the biomedical field, focuses on epidemiologic-statistical methodology, ethics, language and communication skills, and open science from an interdisciplinary and international perspective. In the specific context of the doctoral program assessed in the study and from a broader perspective, public health appears to play a key role, taking advantage of most recent methodological advancements, and contributing to the renovation of the learning process and its systematic quality monitoring.
Conclusions. From a comparative assessment of this case study and Italian legislation, the key role of public health has emerged in the renovation process of doctoral programs in the biomedical field.
References
1. Gola M, Brambilla A, Barach P, Signorelli C, Capolongo S. Educational challenges in healthcare design: training multidisciplinary professionals for future hospitals and healthcare. Ann Ig. 2020; 32(5): 549-566. doi: 10.7416/ ai.2020.2375.
2. Ministry of University and Research. Regulation concerning procedures for the accreditation of doctoral institutions and courses and criteria for the establishment of doctoral courses by accredited entities. Minitsterial Decree 226/2021 Rome2021. Available from: https://www.anvur.it/wp-content/ uploads/2023/09/DM226_2021_eng.pdf. [Last accessed: 2023 December 15].
3. Filippini T, Vinceti SR. Italian National Recovery and
Resilience Plan: a healthcare renaissance after the COVID19 crisis? Acta Biomed. 2021; 92(S6): e2021463. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS6.12339.
4. Hahn RA, Truman BI. Education improves public health and promotes health equity. Int J Health Serv. 2015; 45(4): 657-678. doi: 10.1177/0020731415585986.
5. Saramin A, Del Pin M, Miotto E, Smaniotto C, Cadez L, Kodilja R, et al. UNO’s Sustainable Development Goals in academic courses: a pilot analysis on the programs of an Italian university. Ann Ig. 2024; 36(1): 60-71. doi: 10.7416/ ai.2023.2579.
6. Blackford S. Harnessing the power of communities: career networking strategies for bioscience PhD students and postdoctoral researchers. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2018; 365(8). doi: 10.1093/femsle/fny033.
7. Paduano S, Incerti F, Borsari L, Benski AC, Ernest A, Mwampagatwa I, et al. Use of a mHealth system to Improve antenatal care in low and lower-middle income countries: report on patients and healthcare workers’ acceptability in Tanzania. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(22): 15342. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215342.
8. Moore JH, Glenesk KT, Hulsizer DK, McCright BE, Wrenn C, Sander T, et al. Impact of an innovative clinical internship model in the US Army-Baylor Doctoral Program in physical therapy. US Army Med Dep J. 2014: 30-34.
9. Moore DW, Dilmore TC, Robinson GF. Advancing knowledge and research: developing a doctoral program in clinical and translational science. Clin Transl Sci. 2011; 4(5): 359362. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00288.x.
10. Nolan MT, Liu H, Li Z, Lu C, Hill MN. International doctoral education partnership: the first full-time doctoral program for nurses in china. J Prof Nurs. 2011; 27(6): 354-361. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2011.04.010.
11. Means AR, Phillips DE, Lurton G, Njoroge A, Furere SM, Liu R, et al. The role of implementation science training in global health: from the perspective of graduates of the field’s
first dedicated doctoral program. Glob Health Action. 2016; 9: 31899. doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.31899.
12. Lust D, Topliff D, Deotte R. Successes and challenges in a novel doctoral program in systems agriculture: a case example. Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2010; 75(1): 115-129.
13. Hunaefi D. An introduction of internationalisation in food science doctoral program: a case study of Bogor Agricultural University, Indonesia. Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2010; 75(1): 199-208.
14. Haas BK, Yarbrough S, Klotz L. Journey to a doctoral program. J Prof Nurs. 2011; 27(5): 269-282. doi: 10.1016/j. profnurs.2011.04.006.
15. Botelho K, Myers J. Advancing primary care: doctoral program for physician associates and nurse practitioners. Med Teach. 2023: 1-4. doi: 10.1080/0142159x.2023.2271153.
16. Linfield KJ. Hands-on program evaluation training: the evolution of a doctoral course. J Prev Interv Community. 2023; 51(2): 113-129. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2019.1643580.
17. Giddens J, Curry-Lourenco K, Miles E, Reeder E. Enhancing learning in an online doctoral course through a virtual community platform. J Prof Nurs. 2021; 37(1): 184-189. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.05.007.
18. ANVUR. [Proposta di linee guida per la rilevazione delle opinioni di studenti e laureandi] 2019. Available from: https://www.anvur.it/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/PropostaLG-rilevazione-opinioni-studenti-2019.pdf. [Last accessed: 2023 December 15].
19. Global Forum on Innovation in Health Professional Education, Board on Global Health, Institute of Medicine. Interprofessional education for collaboration: learning how to improve health from interprofessional models across the continuum of education to practice. Workshop summary. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2013.
20. Freel SA, Fish LJ, Mirman B, Sudan R, Devi GR. Advancement of multidisciplinary education and research in translational sciences: MERITS program development at Duke University. J Clin Transl Sci. 2018; 2(1): 57-62. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.17.
21. Ferri P, Vivarelli C, Lui F, Alberti S, Rovesti S, Serafini A, et al. Evaluation of an interprofessional education intervention in partnership with patient educators. Acta Biomed. 2023; 94(5): e2023250. doi: 10.23750/abm.v94i5.14825.
22. Ministry of University and Research. [Linee Guida per l’accreditamento dei dottorati di ricerca] 2022. Available from: https://www.mur.gov.it/sites/default/files/2022-05/ Decreto%20Ministeriale%20n.%20301%20del%2022-032022.pdf. [Last accessed: 2023 December 15].
23. Blandi L, Odone A. The synergies of University Education and Primary Health Care to meet populations health needs. Ann Ig. 2023; 35(1): 121-124. doi: 10.7416/ai.2022.2545.
24. Goodman JD, Muckelbauer R, Muller-Nordhorn J, Cavallo F, Kalediene R, Kuiper T, et al. European accreditation and the future public health workforce. Eur J Public Health. 2015; 25(6): 1112-1116. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv054.
25. van de Ven AL, Shann MH, Sridhar S. Essential components of a successful doctoral program in nanomedicine. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015; 10: 23-30. doi: 10.2147/ijn.S69144.
26. Lancaster CL, Higginson L, Chen B, Encarnacion-Rivera L, Morton DJ, Corbett AH. How to select a graduate school program for a PhD in biomedical science. Curr Protoc. 2022; 2(6): e450. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.450.
27. Woolston C. PhD students face cash crisis with wages that don’t cover living costs. Nature. 2022; 605(7911): 775-777. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-01392-w.
28. Kahn RA, Conn GL, Pavlath GK, Corbett AH. Use of a grant writing class in training PhD students. Traffic. 2016; 17(7): 803-814. doi: 10.1111/tra.12398.
29. Mazzi D. Semantic sequences and the pragmatics of medical research article writing. In: Gotti M, Maci SM, Sala M, editors. Insights into medical communication. 203. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang; 2015. p. 353-368.
30. Lash TL, VanderWeele TJ, Haneuse S, Rothman KJ. Modern Epidemiology. 4th edition ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins - Wolters Kluwer; 2021.
31. Hill AB. The environment and disease: association or causation? Proc R Soc Med. 1965; 58(5): 295-300. doi.
32. Berselli N, Filippini T, Adani G, Vinceti M. Chapter 27 - Dismissing the use of P-values and statistical significance testing in scientific research: new methodological perspectives in toxicology and risk assessment. In: Tsatsakis AM, editor. Toxicological risk assessment and multi-system health impacts from exposure: Academic Press; 2021. p. 309-321.
33. Consonni D. [p-value <0.05? No, thanks]. Epidemiol Prev. 2022; 46(5-6): 302. doi: 10.19191/EP22.5-6.A551.094.
34. Greenland S, Senn SJ, Rothman KJ, Carlin JB, Poole C, Goodman SN, et al. Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016; 31(4): 337-350. doi: 10.1007/s10654-016 -0149-3.
35. Wasserstein RL, Lazar NA. The ASA Statement on p-values: context, process, and purpose. Am Stat. 2016; 70(2): 129133. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108.
36. Filippini T, Vinceti SR. The role of statistical significance testing in public law and health risk assessment. J Prev Med Hyg. 2022; 63(1): E161-E165. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/ jpmh2022.63.1.2394.
37. Vinceti SR, Filippini T. Towards the dismissal of null hypothesis/statistical significance testing in public health, public law and toxicology. Pub Health Tox. 2021; 1(2): 1-6. doi: 10.18332/pht/144290.
38. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Planning study size based on precision rather than power. Epidemiology. 2018; 29(5): 599-603. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000876.
39. Schunemann HJ, Neumann I, Hultcrantz M, BrignardelloPetersen R, Zeng L, Murad MH, et al. GRADE guidance 35: update on rating imprecision for assessing contextualized certainty of evidence and making decisions.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022; 150: 225-242. doi: 10.1016/j. jclinepi.2022.07.015.
40. Orsini N, Larsson SC, Salanti G. Dose-response metaanalysis. In: Egger M, Higgins JPT, Davey Smith G, editors. Systematic reviews in health research. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley Blackwell; 2022. p. 258-269.
41. Vinceti M, Filippini T, Wise LA, Rothman KJ. A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of exposure to environmental selenium and the risk of type 2 diabetes in nonexperimental studies. Environ Res. 2021; 197: 111210. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111210.
42. Filippini T, Wise LA, Vinceti M. Cadmium exposure and risk of diabetes and prediabetes: A systematic review and doseresponse meta-analysis. Environ Int. 2022; 158: 106920. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106920.
43. Murad MH, Verbeek J, Schwingshackl L, Filippini T, Vinceti M, Akl EA, et al. GRADE guidance 38: updated guidance for rating up certainty of evidence due to a dose-response gradient. J Clin Epidemiol. 2023; 164: 45-53. doi: 10.1016/j. jclinepi.2023.09.011.
44. Filippini T, Naska A, Kasdagli MI, Torres D, Lopes C, Carvalho C, et al. Potassium intake and blood pressure: a dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020; 9(12): e015719. doi: 10.1161/ JAHA.119.015719.
45. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016; 5(1): 210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
46. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Eds, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2nd ed. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2019.
47. Sterne JA, Hernan MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016; 355: i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.
48. Morgan RL, Thayer KA, Santesso N, Holloway AC, Blain R, Eftim SE, et al. A risk of bias instrument for non-randomized studies of exposures: a users’ guide to its application in the context of GRADE. Environ Int. 2019; 122: 168-184. doi:
10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.004.
49. Higgins J, Morgan R, Rooney A, Taylor K, Thayer K, Silva R, et al. Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Exposure (ROBINS-E) 2023. Available from: https://www. riskofbias.info/welcome/robins-e-tool. [Last accessed: 2023 December 15].
50. Sterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019; 366: l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
51. National Toxicology Program. OHAT Risk of Bias Tool 2023. Available from: https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/whatwestudy/assessments/noncancer/riskbias. [Last accessed: 2023 December 15].
52. DistellerSR. DistillerSR - Smarter Reviews: Trusted Evidence 2023. Available from: https://www.distillersr.com. [Last accessed: 2023 December 15].
53. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372: n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
54. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). PROSPERO. International prospective register of systematic reviews 2023. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/. [Last accessed: 2023 December 15].
55. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008; 336(7650): 924-926. doi: 10.1136/ bmj.39489.470347.AD.
56. Schunemann HJ, Brennan S, Akl EA, Hultcrantz M, Alonso-Coello P, Xia J, et al. The development methods of official GRADE articles and requirements for claiming the use of GRADE - A statement by the GRADE guidance group. J Clin Epidemiol. 2023; 159: 79-84. doi: 10.1016/j. jclinepi.2023.05.010.
57. Filippini T, Malavolti M, Whelton PK, Naska A, Orsini N, Vinceti M. Blood pressure effects of sodium reduction: dose-response meta-analysis of experimental studies. Circulation. 2021; 143(16): 1542-1567. doi: 10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050371.
58. Crippa A, Discacciati A, Bottai M, Spiegelman D, Orsini N. One-stage dose-response meta-analysis for aggregated data. Stat Methods Med Res. 2019; 28(5): 1579-1596. doi:
10.1177/0962280218773122.
59. Crippa A, Orsini N. Dose-response meta-analysis of differences in means. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016; 16: 91. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0189-0.
60. Urbano T, Vinceti M, Wise LA, Filippini T. Light at night and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and doseresponse meta-analysis. Int J Health Geogr. 2021; 20(1): 44. doi: 10.1186/s12942-021-00297-7.
61. Tancredi S, Urbano T, Vinceti M, Filippini T. Artificial light at night and risk of mental disorders: a systematic review.
Sci Total Environ. 2022; 833: 155185. doi: 10.1016/j. scitotenv.2022.155185.
62. Urbano T, Vinceti M, Filippini T. Artificial light at night and night-shift work: emerging threats for human health. Pub Health Tox. 2023; 3(2): 1-4. doi: 10.18332/pht/168613.
63. Hogervorst J, Virgolino A, Halldorsson TI, Vinceti M, Åkesson A, Leander K, et al. Maternal acrylamide exposure during pregnancy and fetal growth: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Environ Res. 2022; 213: 113705. doi: 10.1016/j. envres.2022.113705.
64. Filippini T, Halldorsson TI, Capitao C, Martins R, Giannakou K, Hogervorst J, et al. Dietary acrylamide exposure and risk of site-specific cancer: a systematic review and doseresponse meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Front Nutr. 2022; 9: 875607. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.875607.
65. Veneri F, Vinceti M, Generali L, Giannone ME, Mazzoleni E, Birnbaum LS, et al. Fluoride exposure and cognitive neurodevelopment: systematic review and dose-response metaanalysis. Environ Res. 2023; 221: 115239. doi: 10.1016/j. envres.2023.115239.
66. Veneri F, Iamandii I, Vinceti M, Birnbaum LS, Generali L, Consolo U, et al. Fluoride exposure and skeletal fluorosis: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2023. doi: 10.1007/s40572-02300412-9.
67. Iamandii I, De Pasquale L, Giannone ME, Veneri F, Generali L, Consolo U, et al. Does fluoride exposure affect thyroid function? A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Environ Res. 2023: 117759. doi: 10.1016/j. envres.2023.117759.
68. Fiore G, Veneri F, Di Lorenzo R, Generali L, Vinceti M, Filippini T. Fluoride exposure and ADHD: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(4): 797. doi: 10.3390/medicina59040797.
69. Corso L, Buttera M, Candia F, Sforza F, Rossi K, Lugli L, et al. Infectious risks related to umbilical venous catheter dwell time and its replacement in newborns: a narrative review of current evidence. Life (Basel). 2022; 13(1): 123. doi: 10.3390/life13010123.
70. Miselli F, Frabboni I, Di Martino M, Zinani I, Buttera M, Insalaco A, et al. Transmission of Group B Streptococcus in late-onset neonatal disease: a narrative review of current evidence. Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2022; 9: 1-14. doi: 10.1177/20499361221142732.
71. Vitolo M, Mei DA, Cimato P, Bonini N, Imberti JF, Cataldo P, et al. Cardiac surgery in Jehovah’s Witnesses patients and association with peri-operative outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023; 48(9): 101789. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.101789.
72. Giannone ME, Filippini T, Whelton PK, Chiari A, Vitolo M, Boriani G, et al. Atrial fibrillation and the risk of earlyonset dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022; 11(14): e025653. doi: 10.1161/ JAHA.122.025653.
73. World Health Organization (WHO). Research ethics committees: basic concepts for capacity-building 2009. Available from: https://www.who.int/ethics/Ethics_basic_concepts_ ENG.pdf. [Last accessed: 2023 December 15].
74. Tusino S, Furfaro M. Rethinking the role of Research Ethics Committees in the light of Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 on clinical trials and the COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022; 88(1): 40-46. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14871.
75. Marinelli E, Busardo FP. The role of the Ethics Committees in the application of the European Regulation No 536/2014. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016; 20(5): 789-791.
76. Hong DZ, Goh JL, Ong ZY, Ting JJQ, Wong MK, Wu J, et al. Postgraduate ethics training programs: a systematic scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2021; 21(1): 338. doi:
10.1186/s12909-021-02644-5.
77. Thomas HC, Meador K, Payne K, Drolet BC. Interdisciplinary ethics certificate program for graduate medical education trainees. J Grad Med Educ. 2021; 13(6): 863-867. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-00474.1.
78. Vinceti SR, Filippini T. Revising the legislation of Ethics Committees to ease biomedical research in humans across the world: lessons from the COVID-19 emergency. Acta Biomed. 2022; 93(2): e2021579. doi: 10.23750/abm. v93i2.12582.
79. Guillemin M, Gillam L, Rosenthal D, Bolitho A. Human research ethics committees: examining their roles and practices. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012; 7(3): 38-49. doi:
10.1525/jer.2012.7.3.38.
80. Petrini C. What is the role of ethics committees after Regulation (EU) 536/2014? J Med Ethics. 2016; 42(3): 186-188. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103028.
81. Petrini C, Brusaferro S. Ethics committees and research in Italy: seeking new regulatory frameworks (with a look at the past). Commentary. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2019; 55(4): 314-318. doi: 10.4415/ANN_19_04_02.
82. Petrini C, Fiori G, Gussoni G, Cazzaniga S, Corrao G, Lovato V, et al. The increasing need for a new Italian legislation to facilitate execution of observational studies assuring ethics and the highest standards of scientific and methodological quality. Editorial. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2020; 56(3): 257259. doi: 10.4415/ANN_20_03_01.
83. Foundation Open Knowlege. The Open definition 2015. Available from: http://opendefinition.org/. [Last accessed: 2023 December 15].
84. Di Federico S, Filippini T, Marchesi C, Vinceti M. Availability of open data related to COVID-19 epidemic
in Italy. Ann Ig. 2023; 35(3): 344-358. doi: 10.7416/ ai.2022.2514.
85. Logullo P, de Beyer JA, Kirtley S, Schlussel MM, Collins GS. Open access journal publication in health and medical research and open science: benefits, challenges and limitations. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm2022-112126.
86. Unimore Library Service. Publish or perish? 2023. Available from: https://www.pop.unimore.it. [Last accessed: 2023 December 15].
87. Matranga D, Bono F, Maniscalco L. Statistical advances in epidemiology and public health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(7): 3549. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073549.
88. Birne J, Jørgensen S, Loukkola T. Quality Assurance in Doctoral Education - Results of the ARDE project 2013. Available from: https://www.eua-cde.org/downloads/ publications/2013_byrnej_quality-assurance-arde-projectresults.pdf. [Last accessed: 2023 December 15].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lucia Palandri, Teresa Urbano, Carla Pezzuoli, Francesca Miselli, Riccardo Caraffi, Tommaso Filippini, Annalisa Bargellini, Elena Righi, Davide Mazzi, Giacomo Pietro Vigezzi, Anna Odone, Sandra Marmiroli, Giuseppe Boriani, Marco Vinceti (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.