Injury Patterns and Gender in Italy

Injury Patterns and Gender in Italy

Authors

  • Elisa Maietti
  • Angelo Capodici
  • Francesco Sanmarchi
  • Maria Pia Fantini
  • Nicola Nante
  • Davide Golinelli

Keywords:

: Road Traffic Accidents; Home-Leisure Accidents; Gender Differences; Age Differences; EHIS Data; Injury Risk

Abstract

Introduction. Globally, injuries pose significant public health challenges, with road traffic accidents in particular being responsible for considerable morbidity, mortality, and economic distress. Italy has been significantly impacted due to its high population density and frequency of road traffic and domestic incidents.

Method. This study set out to investigate the incidence of self-reported road traffic and home and leisure accidents in the Italian general population. A particular emphasis was placed on exploring possible gender differences across varying age groups. The data was obtained from the European Health Interview Survey and a representative sample of the Italian population was analyzed. Results. The analysis revealed that regardless of age, women experienced a reduced risk of road traffic accidents compared to men. However, gender disparities in home-leisure accidents were observed to be age-dependent. Women under the age of 25 exhibited a lower likelihood of home-leisure accidents and serious accidents necessitating hospital admission in comparison to their male counterparts. In contrast, women aged 65 and above had an increased likelihood of home-leisure accidents as opposed to men in the same age category.

Conclusions. The findings of this study highlight the importance of considering age and gender as significant factors in the occurrence of different types of accidents, offering insight into how injury rates vary between these demographic groups within Italy.

References

1. Chou PS, Huang SH, Chung RJ, Huang YC, Chung CH, Wang BL, et al. Gender Differences in the Epidemiological Characteristics and Long-Term Trends of Injuries in Taiwan from 1998 to 2015: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 22; 19: 2531. https://doi. org/10.3390/ ijerph19052531. PMID: 35270224; PMCID: PMC8909776.

2. Haagsma JA, Graetz N, Bolliger I, Naghavi M, Higashi H, Mullany EC, et al. The global burden of injury: incidence, mortality, disability-adjusted life years and time trends from the Global Burden of Disease study 2013. Inj Prev. 2016 Feb; 22(1): 3-18. PMID: 26635210; PMCID: PMC4752630. https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041616. Epub 2015 Dec 3.

3. Peden M, Scurfiled R, Sleet D, eds. World report on road traffic injury prevention. World Health Organization; 2004. Available on: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42871 [Last accessed: 2023 July 11].

4. Barone R, Pelletti G, Garagnani M, Giusti A, Marzi M, Rossi F, et al. Alcohol and illicit drugs in drivers involved in road traffic crashes in Italy. An 8-year retrospective study. Forensic Sci Int. 2019; 305: 110004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. forsciint.2019.110004. PMID: 31707239.

5. Hels T, Lyckegaard A, Simonsen KW, Steentoft A, Bernhoft, IM. Risk of severe driver injury by driving with psychoactive substances. Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Oct; 59: 346-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Jun 8. PMID: 23867258.

6. Al-Balbissi AH. Role of gender in road accidents. Traffic Inj Prev. 2003 Mar; 4(1): 64-73. doi: 10.1080/15389580309857. PMID: 14522664.

7. Massie DL, Campbell KL, Williams AF. Traffic accident involvement rates by driver age and gender. Accid Anal Prev. 1995 Feb; 27(1): 73-87. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(94)00050-v. PMID: 7718080.

8. Chipman ML, MacGregor CG, Smiley AM, Lee-Gosselin M. The role of exposure in comparisons of crash risk among different drivers and driving environments. Accid Anal Prev. 1993 Apr; 25(2): 207-11. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(93)90061-z. PMID: 8471119.

9. Kweon YJ, Kockelman KM. Overall injury risk to different drivers: combining exposure, frequency, and severity models. Accid Anal Prev. 2003 Jul; 35(4): 441-50. doi: 10.1016/ s0001-4575(02)00021-0. PMID: 12729808.

10. Santamariña-Rubio E, Pérez K, Olabarria M, Novoa AM. Gender differences in road traffic injury rate using time travelled as a measure of exposure. Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Apr; 65: 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.11.015. Epub 2013 Dec 16. PMID: 24384384.

11. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (ISTAT). Condizioni di salute e ricorso ai servizi sanitari in Italia e nell’Unione Europea - Indagine EHIS 2019, “Nota Metodologica”. Available on: https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/265399 [Last accessed: 2023 July 11].

12. European Health Interview Survey (EHIS third wave)

— Methodological manual. 2018. Available on: https:// ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-manuals-and-guidelines/-/KS-02-18-240 [Last accessed: 2023 July 11].

13. Sterne JA, White IR, Carlin JB, Spratt M, Royston P, Kenward MG, et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009 Jun 29; 338: b2393. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2393. PMID: 19564179; PMCID: PMC2714692.

14. Azur MJ, Stuart EA, Frangakis C, Leaf PJ. Multiple imputation by chained equations: what is it and how does it work? Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2011 Mar; 20(1): 40-9. doi: 10.1002/mpr.329.

15. Camino López MA, González Alcántara ÓJ, Fontaneda I. Gender Differences in Commuting Injuries in Spain and Their Impact on Injury Prevention. Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017: 3834827. doi: 10.1155/2017/3834827. Epub 2017 Nov 26. PMID: 29318145; PMCID: PMC5727637.

16. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Fatal occupational injuries by industry and event or exposure, all United States, 2019. U.S.

Department of Labor; 2020. Available on: https://www.bls.

gov/iif/oshcfoi1.htm [Last accessed: 2023 July 11].

17. Oreffice S, Sansone D. Commuting to work and genderconforming social norms: evidence from same-sex couples. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.10344 (2022).

18. Haranko K, Zagheni E, Garimella K, Weber I. Professional gender gaps across US cities. Proceedings of the Twelfth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM). 2018; 12(1): 604-7.

19. Byrnes JP, Miller DC, Schafer WD. Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 1999; 125(3): 367-83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367

20. Harris CR, Jenkins M, Glaser D. Gender differences in risk assessment: Why do women take fewer risks than men? Judgment and Decision Making. 2006; 1(1): 48-63. https:// doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500000346.

21. Angulo J, El Assar M, Álvarez-Bustos A, Rodríguez-Mañas L. Physical activity and exercise: Strategies to manage frailty. Redox Biol. 2020 Aug; 35: 101513. doi: 10.1016/j. redox.2020.101513. Epub 2020 Mar 20. PMID: 32234291; PMCID: PMC7284931.

21. Campbell AJ, Spears GF, Borrie MJ. Examination by logistic regression modelling of the variables which increase the relative risk of elderly women falling compared to elderly men. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990; 43(12): 1415-20. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90110-b. PMID: 2254780.

22. Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF). Fast facts on osteoporosis; 2021. Available on: https://www.nof. org/preventing-fractures/general-facts/what-women-needto-know/ [Last accessed: 2023 July 11].

23. Gao S, Chang C, Ren F, Yu F. Safety Culture Measurement Among Chinese Undergraduates at a Private University: Development and Validation. Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 28; 10: 825106. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.825106. PMID: 35419338; PMCID: PMC8995428.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-30

Issue

Section

Original research

How to Cite

1.
Maietti E, Capodici A, Sanmarchi F, Fantini MP, Nante N, Golinelli D. Injury Patterns and Gender in Italy. Ann Ig. 2024;36(3):302-312. doi:10.7416/ai.2024.2620