A survey on hydration and use of plastic water bottles among Italian health sector workers

A survey on hydration and use of plastic water bottles among Italian health sector workers

Authors

  • Camilla Lugli
  • Lucia Palandri
  • Simona Pedretti
  • Romana Bacchi
  • Daniela Altariva
  • Giulia Guerzoni
  • Alessia Sala
  • Claudia Vaccari
  • Tommaso Filippini
  • Elena Righi
  • Marco Vinceti
  • Gabriele Romani

Keywords:

Water intake; health workers; plastic waste; plastic contaminants; water safety; tap water

Abstract

Background. Modena’s Local Health Authority (AUSL) is a public service with more than 5,000 employees. In its facilities, drinking water is available as tap water. However, disposable plastic bottles are also widely used, thus increasing plastic waste.

Study design and methods. In the present study, we aimed to investigate employees’ drinking habits through an ad hoc 10-item online questionnaire, which was administered in spring 2023.

Results. Of the 584 participants (10.8% response rate), 75% of workers reported drinking less than 1.5 liters of water per day. In addition, 74% of workers brought water from home, while 62% used disposable plastic containers bought in the workplace or outside. When asked if they would appreciate a water refilling station in the workplace, whether that would induce them to consume less plastic and to drink more water, 91%, 82%, and 72% of workers said “yes”, respectively. By installing water coolers, the estimated mean number of plastic bottles spared every day at the AUSL would be about 6,000.

Conclusions. Our data shed light on most employees’ perceived need for alternative sources of drinking water, not only in order to drink more for health benefits, but also to reduce plastic usage in favor of reusable, more environmentally friendly materials

References

1. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Dietary Reference Values for nutrients Summary report. EFSA Support Publ. 2017; 14(12): e15121E. doi: 10.2903/sp.efsa.2017. e15121.

2. Lieberman HR. Hydration and cognition: a critical review and recommendations for future research. J Am Coll Nutr. 2007; 26(5 Suppl): 555S-561S. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2007.10719658.

3. Luo Y, Chen Hsu C, Jui Lin K, Kai Fu S, Ru Chen J, Lai CC. Effectiveness of a Water Intake Program at the Workplace in Physical and Mental Health Outcomes. Inq J Med Care Organ Provis Financ. 2022; 59: 00469580221085778. doi:

10.1177/00469580221085778.

4. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition, and Allergies (NDA). Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for water. EFSA J. 2010;8(3): 1459. doi: 10.2903/j. efsa.2010.1459.

5. Panel on Dietary Reference Intakes for Electrolytes and Water, Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes, Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate. National Academies Press, Washington, DC. 2005. Available from: http://www.nap.edu/ catalog/10925. [Last accessed: 2024 April 22]

6. Armstrong LE, Johnson EC. Water Intake, Water Balance, and the Elusive Daily Water Requirement. Nutrients. 2018; 10(12): 1928. doi: 10.3390/nu10121928.

7. Rongen A, Robroek SJW, van Lenthe FJ, Burdorf A. Workplace health promotion: a meta-analysis of effectiveness.

Am J Prev Med. 2013; 44(4): 406-415. doi: 10.1016/j. amepre.2012.12.007.

8. Parry D, Oeppen RS, Gass H, Brennan PA. Impact of hydration and nutrition on personal performance in the clinical workplace. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 55(10): 995998. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.10.017.

9. UN General Assembly. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, A/RES/70/1. 2015. Available from: https://www.refworld.org/legal/resolution/ unga/2015/en/111816. [Last accessed: 2024 April 22]

10. Costa A, Mouro C, Duarte AP. Waste separation—Who cares? Organizational climate and supervisor support’s role in promoting pro-environmental behaviors in the workplace. Front Psychol. 2022; 13: 1082155. doi: 10.3389/ fpsyg.2022.1082155.

11. Qian N, Gao X, Lang X, Deng H, Bratu TM, Chen Q, et al. Rapid single-particle chemical imaging of nanoplastics by SRS microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(3): e2300582121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2300582121.

12. Levallois P, Barn P, Valcke M, Gauvin D, Kosatsky T. Public Health Consequences of Lead in Drinking Water. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2018; 5(2): 255-262. doi: 10.1007/ s40572-018-0193-0.

13. Pfadenhauer LM, Burns J, Rohwer A, Rehfuess EA. Effectiveness of interventions to reduce exposure to lead through consumer products and drinking water: A systematic review. Environ Res. 2016; 147: 525-536. doi: 10.1016/j. envres.2016.03.004.

14. Vinceti M, Crespi CM, Bonvicini F, Malagoli C, Ferrante M, Marmiroli S, et al. The need for a reassessment of the safe upper limit of selenium in drinking water.

Sci Total Environ. 2013; 443: 633-642. doi: 10.1016/j. scitotenv.2012.11.025.

15. Iamandii I, De Pasquale L, Giannone ME, Veneri F, Generali L, Consolo U, et al. Does fluoride exposure affect thyroid function? A systematic review and dose-response metaanalysis. Environ Res. 2024; 242:117759.

16. Veneri F, Iamandii I, Vinceti M, Birnbaum LS, Generali L, Consolo U, et al. Fluoride Exposure and Skeletal Fluorosis: a Systematic Review and Dose-response Meta-analysis. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2023; 10(4): 417-441. doi: 10.1016/j. envres.2023.117759.

17. Magurany KA, English JC, Cox KD. Application of the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) in the evaluation of drinking water contact chemicals. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2023; 1-17. doi: 10.1080/15376516.2023.2279041. Online ahead of print.

18. Villanueva CM, Kogevinas M, Cordier S, Templeton MR, Vermeulen R, Nuckols JR, et al. Assessing exposure and health consequences of chemicals in drinking water: current state of knowledge and research needs. Environ Health Perspect. 2014; 122(3): 213-221. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1206229.

19. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Some chemicals present in industrial and consumer products, food and drinking-water. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2013; 101: 9-549. Available from: https://publications.iarc.fr/Book-And-Report-Series/ Iarc-Monographs-On-The-Identification-Of-CarcinogenicHazards-To-Humans/Some-Chemicals-Present-In-Industrial-And-Consumer-Products-Food-And-Drinking-water-

2012 [Last accessed: 2024 April 22]

20. Deziel NC, Villanueva CM. Assessing exposure and health consequences of chemicals in drinking water in the 21st Century. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2024; 34(1): 1-2. doi: 10.1038/s41370-024-00639-0.

21. European Union. Regulation CE 2184/2020. 2020.

22. Italian Government. Legislative Decree 18/2023. 2023.

23. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica. ISTAT WATER STATISTICS. Available from: https://www.istat.it/it/files//2022/04/

Report_ISTAT-WATER-STATISTICS.pdf. [Last accessed: 2024 April 22]

24. Galati A, Alaimo LS, Ciaccio T, Vrontis D, Fiore M. Plastic or not plastic? That’s the problem: analysing the Italian students purchasing behavior of mineral water bottles made with eco-friendly packaging. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2022; 179: 106060. doi: 10.1016/j. resconrec.2021.106060.

25. Go YJ, Kang DH, Park HJ, Lee JH, Shim JK. Meta-Analysis of Life Cycle Assessment Studies for Polyethylene Terephthalate Water Bottle System. Sustainability. 2024; 16(2): 535. doi: 10.3390/su16020535.

26. Di Paolo L, Abbate S, Celani E, Di Battista D, Candeloro G. Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Plastic Items and Their Substitution. Sustainability. 2022; 14(24): 16563. doi: 10.3390/su142416563.

27. Pasqualino J, Meneses M, Castells F. The carbon footprint and energy consumption of beverage packaging selection and disposal. J Food Eng. 2011; 103(4): 357-365. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.11.005.

28. Gleick PH, Cooley HS. Energy implications of bottled water. Environ Res Lett. 2009; 4(1): 014009. doi: 10.1088/17489326/4/1/014009.

29. Lucaccioni L, Palandri L, Passini E, Trevisani V, Calandra Buonaura F, Bertoncelli N, et al. Perinatal and postnatal exposure to phthalates and early neurodevelopment at 6 months in healthy infants born at term. Front Endocrinol. 2023; 14: 1172743. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1172743.

30. De Pasquale L, Lugli C, Palandri L, Barbieri R, Passini E, Facchinetti F, et al. Early life exposure to phthalates and risk assessment: are we doing enough? Popul Med. 2023; 5: 334-335. doi: 10.18332/popmed/164008.

31. Zuccarello P, Ferrante M, Cristaldi A, Copat C, Grasso A, Sangregorio D, et al. Exposure to microplastics (<10 μm) associated to plastic bottles mineral water consumption: The first quantitative study. Water Res. 2019; 157: 365-371. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.03.091.

32. Haleem N, Kumar P, Zhang C, Jamal Y, Hua G, Yao B, et al. Microplastics and associated chemicals in drinking water:

A review of their occurrence and human health implica-

tions. Sci Total Environ. 2024; 912: 169594. doi: 10.1016/j. scitotenv.2023.169594.

33. Landrigan PJ, Raps H, Cropper M, Bald C, Brunner M, Canonizado EM, et al. The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health. Ann Glob Health. 2023; 89(1): 23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056.

34. Pichler PP, Jaccard IS, Weisz U, Weisz H. International comparison of health care carbon footprints. Environ Res Lett. 2019; 14(6): 064004. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ ab19e1.

35. Rodríguez-Jiménez L, Romero-Martín M, Spruell T, Steley Z, Gómez-Salgado J. The carbon footprint of healthcare settings: A systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2023; 79(8): 2830-2844. doi: 10.1111/jan.15671.

36. Tennison I, Roschnik S, Ashby B, Boyd R, Hamilton I, Oreszczyn T, et al. Health care’s response to climate change: a carbon footprint assessment of the NHS in England. Lancet Planet Health. 2021; 5(2): e84-e92. doi: 10.1016/S25425196(20)30271-0.

37. Balbus J. Observations from COP27: Health Care Is Becoming a Bigger Part of the Climate Change Solution. Environ Health Perspect. 2022; 130(12): 121001. doi: 10.1289/ EHP12549.

38. World Health Organization (WHO). Operational framework for building climate resilient and low carbon health systems. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/ item/9789240081888 [Last accessed: 2024 April 22].

39. Freije AM, Hammad LH, Al-Mannai M, Perna S. Factors Influencing Water Consumption in the Kingdom of Bahrain and Environmental Consequences of Bottled Water Consumption. Ann Ig. 2023; 35(1): 92-111. doi: 10.7416/ ai.2022.2451.

40. Umoafia N, Joseph A, Edet U, Nwaokorie F, Henshaw O, Edet B, et al. Deterioration of the quality of packaged potable water (bottled water) exposed to sunlight for a prolonged period: An implication for public health. Food Chem Toxicol Int J Publ Br Ind Biol Res Assoc. 2023; 175: 113728. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2023.113728.

41. Doria MF. Bottled water versus tap water: understanding consumers’ preferences. J Water Health. 2006; 4(2): 271276.

42 Tikvina S, Bonaldo D, Ruffatto A, Varotto M, Pinton E, Zambon V, et al. Measures to reduce plastic waste in the ULSS-6 Euganea Local Health Trust in Padua (Italy). Popul Med. 2023; 5: 299-300. doi: 10.18332/ popmed/164510.

43. Filippini T, Paduano S, Veneri F, Barbolini G, Fiore G, Vinceti M. Adverse human health effects of climate change: an update. Ann Ig. 2024; 36(3): 281-291. doi: 10.7416/ ai.2024.2595.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-30

Issue

Section

Original research

How to Cite

1.
Lugli C, Palandri L, Pedretti S, et al. A survey on hydration and use of plastic water bottles among Italian health sector workers. Ann Ig. 2024;36(6):695-702. doi:10.7416/ai.2024.2639