Validity, reliability and psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Nurses’ Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale

Validity, reliability and psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Nurses’ Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale

Authors

  • Vincenzo Damico Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale of Lecco, Lecco, Italy
  • Manuela Pedrini Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale of Lecco, Lecco, Italy
  • Giuseppe Demoro Department of Neuroscience, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Sette Laghi of Varese, Varese, Italy
  • Luca Cossalter Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale of Lecco, Lecco, Italy
  • Liana Murano Territorial Department, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale of Lecco, Lecco, Italy
  • Antonella D’Alessandro Presidio Ospedaliero SS Annunziata of Taranto, Taranto, Italy
  • Lara Fermi Department of Foreign Languages, Literatures and Modern Cultures, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
  • Margherita Milani Department of Neuroscience, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale of Lecco, Lecco, Italy.
  • Giuseppe Russello Presidio Ospedaliero “S. Elia” of Caltanissetta, Caltanissetta, Italy
  • Viola Margosio Territorial Department, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale of Bergamo Est, Bergamo, Italy

Keywords:

Nurses’ Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale; reliability; validity; cancer pain

Abstract

Background and aim. The Nurses’ Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale (NCPMCS) is a tool developed to assess nurses’ competencies and subjective experiences in cancer pain management. It also supports awareness of their limitations. Assuming cancer pain is not limited to oncology, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the scale among general Italian nurses.

Methods. A cross-sectional study enrolled nurses from 16 hospitals across Northern, Central, and Southern Italy. Convenience sampling was used to select nurses who met inclusion criteria. Participants completed the study to validate the Italian version of the NCPMCS. Internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach’s alpha; construct validity with exploratory factor analysis. Data were collected in July 2024.

Results. The final sample included 128 nurses, 68% of whom were female. Factor loadings ranged from 0.81 to 0.92, and t-values exceeded 1.96 for all 14 items. On a 4-point scale, the overall competency mean was 1.94 ±0.81. The highest mean score was for the multidimensional nature of pain (2.01 ±0.93); the lowest was for pain management (1.87 ±0.83). Cronbach’s alpha was 0.806 (range 0.719–0.836). Fit indices indicated acceptable model adequacy: χ²/df = 2.662, GFI = 0.854, RMSEA = 0.037, AGFI = 0.876, CFI = 0.928.

Conclusion. The Italian version of the NCPMCS is a valid and reliable instrument to assess cancer pain management competencies in nurses, including those outside oncology departments.

References

1. van den Beuken-van Everdingen MH, Hochstenbach LM, Joosten EA, Tjan-Heijnen VC, Janssen DJ. Update on Prevalence of Pain in Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Jun;51(6):1070-1090.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.340. Epub 2016 Apr 23. PMID: 27112310.

2. Webb JA, LeBlanc TW. Evidence-based Management of Cancer Pain. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2018 Aug;34(3):215-226. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Aug 10. PMID: 30100369.

3. Baratta JL, Schwenk ES, Viscusi ER. Clinical consequences of inadequate pain relief: barriers to optimal pain management. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Oct;134(4 Suppl 2):15S-21S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000681. PMID: 25254999.

4. Coveler AL, Mizrahi J, Eastman B, Apisarnthanarax SJ, Dalal S, McNearney T, et al. Pancreas Cancer-Associated Pain Management. Oncologist. 2021 Jun;26(6):e971-e982. doi: 10.1002/onco.13796. Epub 2021 May 12. PMID: 33885205; PMCID: PMC8176967.

5. Kibret AA, Wolde HF, Moges AM, Aragie H, Teferi ET, Assefa YA, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of cancer pain among adult cancer patients evaluated at an oncology unit in the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, northwest Ethiopia. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023 Feb;17(3):1061239. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2022.1061239. PMID: 36874932; PMCID: PMC9982129.

6. Bouya S, Balouchi A, Maleknejad A, Koochakzai M, AlKhasawneh E, Abdollahimohammad A. Cancer Pain Management Among Oncology Nurses: Knowledge, Attitude, Related Factors, and Clinical Recommendations: a Systematic Review. J Cancer Educ. 2019 Oct;34(5):839-846. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1433-6. PMID: 30315497.

7. Jung MY, Matthews AK. Understanding nurses’ experiences and perceptions of end-of-life care for cancer patients in Korea: A scoping review. J Palliat Care. 2021 Oct;36(4):255-264. doi: 10.1177/08258597211027021. Epub 2021 Jun 29. PMID: 34182840.

8. Hassan S, Stevens B, Watt-Watson J, Switzer-McIntyre S, Flannery J, Furlan A. Development and initial evaluation of psychometric properties of a pain competence assessment tool (PCAT). J Pain. 2022 Mar;23(3):398-410. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.09.002. Epub 2021 Sep 25. PMID: 34583019.

9. Al-Atiyyat N, Salim NA, Tuffaha MG, Abu Nigim HA, Saleh MM, Alkhodary ME, et al. A Survey of the Knowledge and Attitudes of Oncology Nurses toward Pain in United Arab Emirates Oncology Settings. Pain Manag Nurs. 2019 Jun;20(3):276-283. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Dec 7. PMID: 30527855.

10. Damico V, Murano L, Macchi G, Forastieri Molinari A, Dal Molin A. Knowledge and attitude of pain management among Italian nurses in intensive care unit: a multicentric descriptive study. Ann Ig. 2021 May-Jun;33(3):220-230. doi: 10.7416/ai.2021.2429. PMID: 33739355.

11. Luo H, Li Q, Xu R, Han S, Yang J. Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Nurses’ Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale. Pain Manag Nurs. 2024 May 10:S1524-9042(24)00142-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.04.003. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38734526.

12. Hu JY, Roh YS. Psychometric Evaluation of the Nurses’ Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale. Pain Manag Nurs. 2023 Apr;24(2):209-215. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2022.08.009. Epub 2022 Sep 25. PMID: 36171159.

13. Damico V, Demoro G, Cossalter L, Murano L, D’Alessandro A, Fermi L, et al. The Italian version of the the Nurses’ Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale: a validation study. In press. Ann Ig. 2025 Mar-Apr;37(2). In press.

14. Mestdagh F, Steyaert A, Lavand’homme P. Cancer Pain Management: A Narrative Review of Current Concepts, Strategies, and Techniques. Curr Oncol. 2023 Jul 18;30(7):6838-6858. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30070500. PMID: 37504360; PMCID: PMC10378332.

15. Google Inc. Google Forms. Available from: [https://www.google.com/forms/about/](https://www.google.com/forms/about/) [Last accessed: 2024 Sep 30].

16. Google Inc. Google Meet. Available from: [https://meet.google.com/](https://meet.google.com/) [Last accessed: 2024 Sep 30].

17. Muthén LK, & Muthén BO. Mplus User’s Guide: Statistical Analysis with Latent Variables. 7th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 2015.

18. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. New York, NY: Harper Collins; 1996.

19. IBM Corp. Released 2021. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2021.

20. MPLUS (Version 6.11). [Computer Software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

21. Vellone E, Riegel B, Cocchieri A, Barbaranelli C, D’Agostino F, Glaser D, et al. Validity and reliability of the caregiver contribution to self-care of heart failure index. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2013 May-Jun;28(3):245-55. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e318256385e. PMID: 22760172.

22. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053. PMID: 24141714.

23. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ L 119 04.05.2016, p. 1, ELI: [http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj](http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj))

24. Almanasreh E, Moles R, Chen TF. Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Feb;15(2):214-221. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066. Epub 2018 Mar 27. PMID: 29606610.

25. Kasasbeh MAM, McCabe C, Payne S. Action learning: an effective way to improve cancer-related pain management. J Clin Nurs. 2017 Nov;26(21-22):3430-3441. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13709. Epub 2017 Mar 2. PMID: 28032387.

26. International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP). IASP Curriculum Outline on Pain for Nursing. 2021. Available from: [https://www.iasp-pain.org/Education/Curriculum-Detail.aspx?ItemNumber=2052](https://www.iasp-pain.org/Education/Curriculum-Detail.aspx?ItemNumber=2052) [Last accessed: 2024 Sep 30].

27. Melia R, Morrell-Scott N, Maine N. A review of compliance with pain assessments within a UK ICU. Br J Nurs. 2019 Mar 28;28(6):382-386. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2019.28.6.382. PMID: 30925247.

28. Grommi S, Vaajoki A, Voutilainen A, Kankkunen P. Effect of Pain Education Interventions on Registered Nurses’ Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pain Manag Nurs. 2023 Aug;24(4):456-468. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2023.03.004. Epub 2023 Apr 7. PMID: 37032260.

29. Youngcharoen P, Aree-Ue S. A cross-sectional study of factors associated with nurses’ postoperative pain management practices for older patients. Nurs Open. 2023 Jan;10(1):90-98. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1281. Epub 2022 Jun 28. PMID: 35762683; PMCID: PMC9748055.

30. Fallon M, Giusti R, Aielli F, Hoskin P, Rolke R, Sharma M, et al. Management of cancer pain in adult patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;29(Suppl 4):iv166-iv191. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy152. PMID: 30052758.

31. Swarm RA, Paice JA, Anghelescu DL, Are M, Bruce JY, Buga S, et al. Adult Cancer Pain, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Aug; 1;17(8):977-1007. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0038. PMID: 31390582.

32. Damico V, Cazzaniga F, Murano L, Ciceri R, Nattino G, Dal Molin A. Impact of a Clinical Therapeutic Intervention on Pain Assessment, Management, and Nursing Practices in an Intensive Care Unit: A before-and-after Study. Pain Manag Nurs. 2018 Jun;19(3):256-266. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2018.01.007. Epub 2018 Apr 19. PMID: 29680212.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-09

Issue

Vol. 37 No. 4 (2025)

Section

Original research

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Vincenzo Damico, Manuela Pedrini, Giuseppe Demoro, Luca Cossalter, Liana Murano, Antonella D’Alessandro, Lara Fermi, Margherita Milani, Giuseppe Russello, Viola Margosio (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers. 
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.

How to Cite

1.
Damico V, Pedrini M, Demoro G, et al. Validity, reliability and psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Nurses’ Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale. Ann Ig. 2025;37(4):411-424. doi:10.7416/ai.2025.2681