Main Article Content
Biobanks, Ethics Issues, Protection of personal data, European Union law, Scientific research
The project “Umbria Biobank” aims at setting up a biobank of human tissues for research purposes. The Umbria Biobank includes an historical archive established from the 1940s onwards by the former Institute of Pathological Anatomy of the University of Perugia and which collects at least 2.5 million tissue blocks and approximately 8 million cytological and histological slides, with accompanying documentation. This valuable collection, which has been maintained and improved over time, has remained largely unused due to several ethical issues and a lack of a specific regulation.
In particular, as for other historical archives of diagnostic documentation, those materials and data have been collected at a time when there was not the awareness about the need of the authorisation of the patients, nor the idea that those materials and data would be useful for further research activities.
The paper relates to the attempt of the biolegal team of the Project to avoid the destruction of important historical archives and to recover them for scientific research, in a legitimate way that respects fundamental rights. The solutions have to be elaborate within the context of the European Union, International and National legal sources.
Angrist, M. Genetic privacy needs a more nuanced approach, in Nature, 7 February 2013, vol. 494, p. 7.
Caulfield, T., Upshur, R.E.G., and Daar, A., DNA databanks and consent: A suggested policy option involving an authorization model, in BMC Medical Ethics, 2003, 4:1.
Cippitani, R., Consent to the Use of Genetic Information: Between Respect of Privacy and Protection of Other Fundamental Interests, in Diritto e Processo/Right and Remedies/Derecho y Proceso, 2014, pp. 493–532.
Colcelli, V., Precautionary Principle Liability in the Food Industry: the search of a general regime in vertical and horizontal Liability, in Arnold, R., Colcelli, V., (eds), Europeanization through private law instruments, Regensburg: Universitätsverlag, 2016, pp. 249 ff.
Gymrek, M., McGuire, A.L., Golan, D., Halperin, E., and Erlich, Y., Identifying Personal Genomes by Surname Inference, in Science, 18 Jan 2013, vol. 339, Issue 6117, pp. 321–324;
Godard, B., Schmidtke, J., Cassiman, J.-J.and Aymé, S., Data storage and DNA banking for biomedical research: informed consent, confidentiality, quality issues, ownership, return of benefits. A professional perspective, in European Journal of Human Genetics, 2003, 11, Suppl 2, S88–S122.
Macilotti, M., Izzo, U., Pascuzzi, G., Barbareschi, M., La disciplina giuridica delle biobanche (The Legal Aspect of Biobanks), in Pathologica, 2008, v. 100, pp. 86–108, particularly p. 87.
Molina del Pozo, C.F., Archontaki, C., Libertad de artes y de Investigación Científica, Libertad de Cátedra, in Álvarez Ledesma, M.I. and Cippitani R. (coord.), Diccionario analítico de Derechos humanos e integración jurídica, ISEG, Roma-Perugia-México, 2013, pp. 361–367
Perry, M., Accessing Accessions, Biobanks and Benefit‐Sharinglection of biological materials, in Pascuzzi G., Izzo, U., Macilotti, M., Biobanks, Springer, 2013, p. 267
Scaffardi, L., Legal Protection and Ethical Management of Genetic Databases: Challenges of the European Process of Harmonization, in European Legal Integration: The New Italian Scholarship, Jean Monnet Working Paper 19/08, New York University School of Law, New York, 2008
Shrager, J., Tenenbaum, J.M., Rapid learning for precision oncology, in Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol., 2014, 11, p. 109 e ss.
Lowrance, W.W., Collins, F.S., Identifiability in Genomic Research, in Science, 3 August 2007, vol. 317, pp. 600–602.
Van Veen, E.B., “Human tissue bank regulations”. Nat Biotech, 2006;24(5):496-7
Vivas Tesón, I., Bioresearch, Biobanks and Informed Consent from Vulnerable Donors in Spanish Law, in Europa e Diritto privato, 2013, p. 1069 ff.