Chest ultrasound vs. Radiograph for pneumothorax diagnosis performed by emergency healthcare workers in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Keywords:
Bedside ultrasound, Chest ultrasound, Chest x‑ray, Pneumothorax, Emergency departmentAbstract
Background: The efficacy of bedside chest ultrasonography for the detection and diagnosis of pneumothorax is under debate. We aimed to compare Emergency Healthcare Workers performed chest ultrasonography with chest X‑ray in the detection and diagnosis of pneumothorax in the emergency department.
Methods: We queried PubMed, Cochrane, ScienceDirect, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from 2000 through January 2024. We included all studies (both retrospective and prospective) that compared the diagnostic performance of chest ultrasonography with chest radiography, using chest computed tomography as the gold standard. Participants are patients consulting in the emergency department and physician that performed the chest ultrasound was an Emergency Healthcare Workers. Studies reporting the sensitivity and specificity for both chest ultrasonography and chest X‑ray met inclusion criteria. We applied a random effects meta‑analysis methodology. We then performed a meta‑regression analysis to search for influencing variables such as technical parameters of echograph, patients and pneumothorax.
Main results: 15 studies totaling 3,171 patients were analyzed. 71% of patients were male with a mean age of 40.2 years. The mean prevalence of pneumothorax was 27.6% (95 CI 20.9 to 34.3). Chest ultrasonography had higher sensitivity (79.4%, 68.2 to 90.7) compared to chest X‑ray (48.1%, 36.8 to 59.4), and a greater negative predictive value (chest ultrasonography = 94.3%, 91.2 to 97.3, and chest X‑ray = 87.9%, 84.1 to 91.6). There was no statistical difference in specificity between the two modalities: chest ultrasonography 99.5%, 99 to 100 and chest X‑ray 99.8%, 99.4 to 100) or in positive predictive value (chest ultrasonography 94.2%, 90.5 to 97.9 vs chest X‑ray 96.7%,92 to 100). Characteristics of echograph or pneumothorax and patients sociodemographic did not influence results.
Conclusion: In this systematic review and meta‑analysis, chest ultrasonography performed by Emergency Healthcare Workers, had greater sensitivity and negative predictive value than chest radiography for the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency department patients.
References
1. Enevoldsen S, Kusk MW (2021) Image quality of bedside chest radiographs in intensive care beds with integrated detector tray: a phantom study. Radiography 27:453–458
2. Bidault A (2023) Disponibilité et utilisations de l’échographie clinique dans les structures d’urgences: une étude nationale descriptive, transversale, multicentrique. Ann Françaises de Méd D’urgence. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3166/ afmu‑2 022‑0 509
3. Heldeweg MLA et al (2022) The impact of lung ultrasound on clinicaldecision making across departments: a systematic review. Ultrasound J 14:5
4. Wernecke K, Galanski M, Peters PE, Hansen J (1987) Pneumothorax: evaluation by ultrasound–preliminary results. J Thorac Imaging 2:76–78 5. Ianniello S, Piccolo CL, Trinci M, Ajmone Cat CA, Miele V (2019) Extended‑FAST plus MDCT in pneumothorax diagnosis of major trauma: time to revisit ATLS imaging approach? J Ultrasound 22:461–469
6. Ebrahimi A et al (2014) Diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasonography versus chest radiography for identification of pneumothorax: a systematic review and meta‑analysis. Tanaffos 13:29–40
7. Staub LJ, Biscaro RRM, Kaszubowski E, Maurici R (2018) Chest ultrasonography for the emergency diagnosis of traumatic pneumothorax and haemothorax: a systematic review and meta‑analysis. Injury 49:457–466
8. Whiting PF et al (2011) QUADAS‑2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155:529–536
9. DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta‑analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188
10. Harbord RM, Whiting P (2009) Metandi: meta‑analysis of diagnostic accuracy using hierarchical logistic regression. Stata 9:211–229
11. Abbasi S, Farsi D, Hafezimoghadam P, Fathi M, Zare MA (2013) Accuracy of emergency healthcare workers ‑performed ultrasound in detecting traumatic pneumothorax after a 2‑h training course. Eur J Emerg Med Off J Eur Soc Emerg Med 20:173–177
12. Blaivas M, Lyon M, Duggal S (2005) A prospective comparison of supine chest radiography and bedside ultrasound for the diagnosis of traumatic pneumothorax. Acad Emerg Med Off J Soc Acad Emerg Med 12:844–849
13. DeMasi S et al (2023) Thoracic point‑of‑care ultrasound is an accurate diagnostic modality for clinically significant traumatic pneumothorax. Acad Emerg Med Off J Soc Acad Emerg Med 30:653–661
14. Karimi E, Safari S, Shekarchi B (2013) Evaluation of the accuracy of portable ultrasound (eFAST) for detection of pneumothorax. Ann Mil Health Sci Res 11:225
15. Kaya Ş et al (2015) A study on the evaluation of pneumothorax by imaging methods in patients presenting to the emergency department for blunt thoracic trauma. Ulus Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Derg Turk J Trauma Emerg Surg TJTES 21:366–372
16. Ku BS et al (2013) Clinician‑performed beside ultrasound for the diagnosis of traumatic pneumothorax. West J Emerg Med 14:103–108
17. Lamsam L, Gharahbaghian L, Lobo V (2018) Point‑of‑care ultrasonography for detecting the etiology of unexplained acute respiratory and chest complaints in the emergency department: a prospective analysis. Cureus 10:e3218
18. Matsumoto S et al (2016) Diagnostic accuracy of oblique chest radiograph for occult pneumothorax: comparison with ultrasonography. World J Emerg Surg WJES 11:5
19. Ojaghi Haghighi SH, Adimi I, Shams Vahdati S, Sarkhoshi Khiavi R (2014) Ultrasonographic diagnosis of suspected hemopneumothorax in trauma patients. Trauma Mon 19:e17498
20. Soldati G et al (2006) Chest ultrasonography in lung contusion. Chest 130:533–538
21. Soldati G et al (2008) Occult traumatic pneumothorax: diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasonography in the emergency department. Chest 133:204–211
22. Uz I et al (2013) Impact of the practice of ‘extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma’ (e‑FAST) on clinical decision in the emergency department. Ulus Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Derg Turk J Trauma Emerg Surg TJTES 19:327–332
23. Vafaei A, Hatamabadi HR, Heidary K, Alimohammadi H, Tarbiyat M (2016) Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and radiography in initial evaluation of chest trauma patients. Emerg (Tehran) 4:29–33
24. Zhang M et al (2006) Rapid detection of pneumothorax by ultrasonography in patients with multiple trauma. Crit Care 10:R112
25. Ziapour B, Haji HS (2015) Anterior convergent” chest probing in rapid ultrasound transducer positioning versus formal chest ultrasonography to detect pneumothorax during the primary survey of hospital trauma patients: a diagnostic accuracy study. J Trauma Manag Outcomes 9:9
26. Ding W, Shen Y, Yang J, He X, Zhang M (2011) Diagnosis of pneumothorax by radiography and ultrasonography: a meta‑analysis. Chest 140:859–866
27. Alrajab S, Youssef AM, Akkus NI, Caldito G (2013) Pleural ultrasonography versus chest radiography for the diagnosis of pneumothorax: review of the literature and meta‑analysis. Crit Care 17:R208
28. Santorelli JE et al (2022) Response to letter to the editor: not so FAST— chest ultrasound underdiagnoses traumatic pneumothorax. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 93:e41
29. Chan SSW (2003) Emergency bedside ultrasound to detect pneumothorax. Acad Emerg Med Off J Soc Acad Emerg Med 10:91–94
30. Rovida S, Orso D, Naeem S, Vetrugno L, Volpicelli G (2022) Lung ultrasound in blunt chest trauma: a clinical review. Ultrasound Leeds Engl 30:72–79
31. Tulay CM, Yaldız S, Bilge A (2018) Oblique chest X‑ray: an alternative way to detect pneumothorax. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 24:127–130
32. Sistrom CL, McKay NL (2005) Costs, charges, and revenues for hospital diagnostic imaging procedures: differences by modality and hospital characteristics. J Am Coll Radiol JACR 2:511–519
33. Lentz B, Fong T, Rhyne R, Risko N (2021) A systematic review of the costeffectiveness of ultrasound in emergency care settings. Ultrasound J 13:16
34. Huang C‑T et al (2023) The effect of point‑of‑care ultrasound on length of stay and mortality in patients with chest pain/dyspnea. Ultraschall Med ‑ Eur J Ultrasound 44:389–394
35. Rahimi‑Movaghar V et al (2016) Application of ultrasonography and radiography in detection of hemothorax; a systematic review and metaanalysis. Emergency 4:116–126
36. Grimberg A, Shigueoka DC, Atallah ÁN, Ajzen S, Iared W (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of sonography for pleural effusion: systematic review. Sao Paulo Med J 128:90–95
37. Bourcier J‑E et al (2014) Performance comparison of lung ultrasound and chest x‑ray for the diagnosis of pneumonia in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 32:115–118
38. Stengel D et al (2018) Point‑of‑care ultrasonography for diagnosing thoracoabdominal injuries in patients with blunt trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ 14651 858. CD012 669. pub2
39. Bloise S et al (2021) Lung ultrasound compared to chest X‑ray for the diagnosis of CAP in children. Pediatr Int 63:448–453
40. Inchingolo R et al (2014) Look at the lung: can chest ultrasonography be useful in pregnancy? Multidiscip Respir Med 9:32
41. Mancusi C, Carlino MV, Sforza A (2019) Point‑of‑care ultrasound with pocket‑size devices in emergency department. Echocardiogr Mt Kisco N 36:1755–1764
42. Fleshner M et al (2022) Impact of point‑of‑care ultrasound in medical decision making: informing the development of an internal medicine global health POCUS curriculum. POCUS J 7:144–153
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jean‑Baptiste Bouillon‑Minois, Coline Burlet, Resa E. Lewiss, Reza Bagheri, Christophe Perrier, Jeannot Schmidt, Frédéric Dutheil (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.
