Risk assessment of biological hazards in University laboratories: checklist and critical control points
Keywords:
Laboratory safety, Biological risk assessment, ChecklistAbstract
Background and aim. Biomedical research in academic settings is an important issue for Public Health and Environment protection. As workplaces, the facilities for research expose their personnel to different hazards and health risks. The University of L’Aquila (Italy) carried out a field study aimed at creating and applying a checklist intended for laboratory staff.
Methods. The proposed checklist was derived from the procedure illustrated in the Appendix (procedure followed for the identification of a numerical index of biological risk for university facilities) and consists of 9 items. The study was conducted in 42 laboratories.
Results. The results highlighted that 40 laboratories fall into the “low risk” and the remaining 2 into the “moderate risk” category.
Conclusions. Labs with risk factors are a minority. These were properly identified using the proposed methodology.
References
1. Morace G, Fazzi P, Ilari M, Salvatore M, Caiola S. Guida operativa per la manipolazione di materiali a rischio biologico (Guidance on the correct handling of biological materials). Roma: Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 2011 (Rapporti ISTISAN 11/31). Available on: www.iss.it [Last accessed: 2021 Feb 12].
2. D.Lgs. (Italian Republic. Legislative Decree) April 9, 2008, n. 81. s.m.i. Titolo X. Esposizione ad Agenti biologici. Art. 267. Def.
3. Istituto Superiore per la Prevenzione e la Sicurezza sul Lavoro (ISPESL). Linee guida sull’attività di sterilizzazione quale protezione collettiva da agenti biologici per l’operatore nelle strutture sanitarie (D.Lgs. 81/2008 e s.m.i.). Roma: ISPESL, maggio 2010. Available on: rev_1f_L.G._ISPESL_Sterilizzazione_versione_20_maggio_2010 (lisaservizi.it) [Last accessed: 2021 Feb 12].
4. Coelho AC, García Díez J. Biological risks and laboratory-biotechnology. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2015; 3: 56. doi: 10.3389/ fbioe.2015.00056.
5. Naroeni A, Bachtiar EW, Ibrahim F, et al. Challenges in implementing a biorisk management program at universitas Indonesia: A Checklist Tool for biorisk management. Health Secur 2016; 14(6): 375-81. doi: 10.1089/hs.2016.0013. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
6. Byrd JJ, Emmert E, Maxwell R, Townsend H. Guidelines for biosafety in teaching laboratories Version 2.0: a revised and updated manual for 2019. J Microbiol Educ 2019; 20(3): 20.3.57. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v20i3.1975.
7. Aronson BD, Silveira LA. From genes to proteins to behavior. A laboratory project that enhances student understanding in cell and molecular biology. CBE Life Sci Educ 2009; 8(4): 291-308. doi: 10.1187/cbe.09-07-0048.
8. Bayot ML, Limaiem F. Biosafety Guidelines. [Update 2020 Mar 25]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2020 Jan-. Available on: https://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/books/NBK537210/ [Last accessed: 2021 Feb 12].
9. Emery RJ, Rios J, Patlovich SJ. Thinking outside the box: biosafety’s role in protecting nonlaboratory workers from exposure to infections disease. Appl Biosaf 2015; 20(3): 128-9. doi: 10.1177/153567601502000301.
10. Jonsson CB, Cole KS, Roy CJ, Perlin DS, Byrne G; members of the RBL-NBL Directors Network. Challenges and practices in building and implementing biosafety and biosecurity programs to enable basic and translational research with select agents. J Bioterror Biodef 2013; Suppl 3(15): 12634. doi: 10.4172/2157-2526. S3-015.
11. Kipnis M, Hofstein A. The inquiry laboratory as a source for development of metacognitive skills.
Int J Sci Math Educ 2008; 6: 601-27. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10763-007-9066-y.
12. Kojima K, Makison Booth C, Summermatter K, et al. Risk-based reboot for global lab. New WHO guidance could expand access to lab facilities. Science 2018; 360(6386): 260-2. doi:
10.1126/science.aar2231.
13. Lipsitch M, Bloom BR. Rethinking biosafety in research on potential pandemic pathogens. mBio. 2012; 3(5): e00360-12. doi: 10.1128/ mBio.00360-12.
14. Matza-Porges D, Nathan S. A biosafety level 2 virology lab for biotechnology undergraduates. Bochem Mol Biol Educ 2017 Nov; 45(6): 53743. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21080. Epub 2017 Jul 30.
15. Mourya DT, Yadav PD, Majumdar TD, Chauan DS, Katoch VM. Establishment of biosafety level-3 (BSL-3) laboratory: important criteria to consider while designing, constructing, commissioning and operating the facility in Indian setting. Indian J Med Res 2014; 140(2): 171-83.
16. Peng H, Bilal M, Iqbal HMN. Improved biosafety and biosecurity measures and/or strategies to tackle laboratoty-acquired infections and related risks. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018 Dec; 15(12): 2697. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122697. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
17. Rusnak JM, Kortepeter MG, Hawley RJ, Anderson AO, Boudreau E, Eitzen E. Risk of occupationally acquired illness from biological threat agents in unvaccinated laboratory workers. Biosecur Bioterror 2004; 2(4): 281-93. doi:
10.1089/bsp.2004.2.281.
18. Trevan T. Biological research: rethink biosafety. Nature 2015; 527(7577): 155-8. doi: 10.1038/527155a.
19. Wurtz N, Papa A, Hukic M, et al. Survey of laboratory-acquired infections around the world in biosafety level 3 and 4 laboratories. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2016 Aug; 35(8): 1247-58. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2657-1. Epub 2016 May 27.
20. Mastrantonio R, Scatigna M, D’Abramo M, Martinez V, Paoletti A, Fabiani L. Experimental Application of Semi-Quantitative Methods for the Assessment of Occupational Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in Research Laboratories. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2020 Oct 6; 13:
1929-37. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S248469.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.